I apologize if anyone feels this comes off as pretentious or is thought awkward. I think of the loss of these young lives very reverently, truly.
Borrowing heavily again from Sherlock.
It seems to me that this adopting the "different investigative strategy" is possibly locked up in that 7 tip policy from Sherlock. I think ISP may have early on defined the area of investigation with preconcieved attitudes that this killer was a random that didn't, couldn't fit into the community. I think after reevaluating some data collected, maybe going back and listening more earnestly to some people, new and vital evidence came to light. The words said directly to the killer while said with much emotion, I think were very calculated and telling. LE does not talk like that normally in a press conference. I tried to observe and deduce. The killer could be in this room? Out of the 3,000 or so citizens of Delphi, how many would even come out of their homes or come away from work to be in that room, at that time, on that day? Narrows it down quite a bit, I think. Most would watch on tv and LE knows that, so why say that? Then the mention of a religious type movie, how will your family, friends feel, missing morals and maybe having just a little bit of conscience left. To me it sounds like ISP was talking directly to someone from a well established and well thought of family in the community. ISP also said, you want to know what we know, it's all about control to you. Could just be a taunt but is that language incidental or vital to what he had to say? Was it said to and about someone who ISP thought just happened by on scene consequencely, I don't know because it had been a cold Winter and it was a mild day? Or said to someone that was full of energy and intent and took a lively interest in murder? I think it's the latter, all about control. That press conference language was not about emotion, he was emotional but he was direct. I believe they know who did this and it's someone totally not expected. The LE changed their mindset, maybe it was a witness re-interviewing maybe by fresh investigators, allowed to talk and talk, who remembered more? Or maybe one that just recently contributed and was deemed a liar? Or visa versa. LE found the killer, hiding in plain site. Possibly not everyone was considered guilty along with the innocence early on? Maybe just one too many preformed conclusions muddled things for awhile. I think it will be totally shocking to the community when the killer is revealed and it's all so tragic.