ok thanks i see that thread has been reopened after a 'respite'There is a thread here on WS about PE
Found Deceased - IN - Paul Etter wanted for Kidnapping, Tippecanoe County, 22 June 2019

ok thanks i see that thread has been reopened after a 'respite'There is a thread here on WS about PE
Found Deceased - IN - Paul Etter wanted for Kidnapping, Tippecanoe County, 22 June 2019
I'm sure we can all think of other safety rules, especially for trail walking, to guard against both human and animal predators! I've been following this case so much that I just don't feel comfortable going alone for hike, unless there are plenty of people around!I’m not sure where it’s coming from, there was no emphasis on public safety in and around Delphi following the murders because that’s not at all the impression I got from following this case early on. I wonder if “no emphasis on safety” is turning into an urban myth. If it is, for what purpose?
We’d have to spend time searching through a lot of the early threads, which I haven’t done but I recall there being several Town Hall meetings as reported by locals, local police canvassing residents - many actions not reported by the media but aimed directly at local residents who were directly impacted. As residents had a right to be alarmed, certainly the personal safety concern would’ve been expressed during these times.
The role of any police force is promoting safety of a community. Therefore it’s highly unlikely any police department is going to make a broad and general announcement the community in which they’re charged with protecting is “unsafe” unless there’s an immediate and active threat that is known. I can’t recall one single news report where a local police department has announced their community is unsafe unless they are actively tracking a known murderer, leading to an imminent arrest. If a suspect hasn’t been identified, every community with unsolved crime would remain unsafe for days, months and in this case years and we’d all be facing a lifetime of hiding in our basements.
What does “safe” or “unsafe” really mean anyway? Is somebody less safe from a 2nd time murderer not yet arrested than becoming the future victim of a 1st time murderer?
There was a list of safety initiatives published earlier as a result of a Delphi workshop. It’s not unique, simply good practises promoting personal safety.
Defense from danger: Chicago-based self-defense group holds workshop in Delphi
The One Light Self-Defense Team offered numerous tips during self-defense training Sunday in Delphi. Here are a few of them.
General safety
•Have a strong appearance, which means head up and eyes forward.
•Appear confident, even in an unknown location.
•Have your cellular phone charged and easily accessible.
•If you carry a weapon, make sure you are properly trained in how to use it, including pepper spray.
•Avoid dark and secluded places, and try not to walk alone, especially at night.
Parking lot and car safety
•Get into your vehicle quickly and lock all the doors.
•Avoid distractions that keep you outside the vehicle for a length of time.
•Don’t wander the parking lot looking for your parked car. Take a picture if needed and remind yourself of the location before you exit the store.
•Try to walk toward the middle of the aisle and in a well-lit location.
Trail safety
•Be aware of your surroundings.
• After you pass someone else, don’t assume you’re safe until there is enough distance between the two of you.
•Go completely around, not between, other runners or walkers.
ok - I'll take your word for it. Thx for the clarity.Quoted bbm
I am going to respectfully disagree with this part of your post.
Her written comments within the chat to clarify this indicate the opposite.
JMO
My amateur opinion is that Kelsi was calling BG out for being weak—which he obviously is. He attacked children, likely because deep down he knows he is weak and cowardly. He probably holds resentment toward women, but wouldn’t attack a grown woman because he is too AFRAID. Girls who are in their preteen/early teen years are likely his target because he views them as both young enough to control without much effort on his part, and old enough to manifest the qualities he despises in adult women.Quoted bbm
I am going to respectfully disagree with this part of your post.
Her written comments within the chat to clarify this indicate the opposite.
JMO
The Internet Crimes Against Children Task Force was involved in that so I'm assuming the phone was in not the best shape. MooGood questions.
I understand the phone was found at the CS, and judging by a recent interview involving a LEO from ISP the phone was on the ground. No indication was given as to what condition the phone was in, something I've wondered about.
JMO
Homosexual encounter by a prominent public figure in the woods or something even more nefarious. There I said it. I’ve also pondered that maybe the staging of both girls was in a non heterosexual manner rather than a religious one. Sorry if it offends anyone because that’s not the intention: i want the truth and I don’t discount the fact that this BG is capable of most anything. MOO
You don't think she hasn't been questioned by LE multiple times? But a lie detector test? She is not a suspect. There is no indications that she wasn't completely cooperative and that she isn't committed to helping find out who killed her sister.
As far as them being in contact with somebody, it's been three years - They have Libby's phone, that was the first place that they started looking. If there was actual contact they would've found it by now. Random crimes of opportunity do happen.
No, you're butchering his wording. He said that they were "onto something" early on, not someone. His comments were too vague for anyone to jump to the conclusion that they had a suspect.I agree in the sense that things don't add up.
They had a suspect early on.. Carter said so..his wording may have been more to the effect that "We were looking at someone, we might have had something early on." (Absolutely NOT verbatim... but captures the essence of it)
They were led in the WRONG direction ..and someone within a circle close to the community knows it.
They ran in a circle for 2 years.. BUT..something changed that.
Something caused the press conference 13 months ago with change of sketch and a bit of new information.
You are right, something isn't adding up..
and someone dropped the ball..
But I believe that as far as the families are concerned..
Every.
Single. One.
Is a victim.
AMOO JMO MOO
Thank you for your huge and great work!!rsbm for space
May 16, 2019
Doug Carter: The sketch isn’t a photograph. A sketch is a sketch and that’s really important for everybody to understand. I believe that the individual, when we catch him, it will be a combination of those two.
ISP: We're 'one tip away' from solving Delphi murders
No, it is just my opinion. There is something not matching together in this story. Even in a his guy, BG. I do believe that Libby somehow got to know some private, damning information. Nothing else could explain the anger towards her.
think of major felonies, federal crimes. Murder, sexual assault, things that would carry long prison terms or worse. Things that would cause major disruption in family or loss of employment.Drugs? Arson?
I discarded these bizarre rumors about“the woods” encounters, and the public figure (such an idiot, after all? no money for a motel?).
They said the opposite IMO. Know what your kids are up to IIRC.I don't recall them asserting that the public was safe. I do recall them issuing the standard deflections that are designed to make sure panic doesn't consume the community. I do remember LE saying, when asking for tips, "the next time it could be your mother or sister...or father or brother." If a "next time" is thought to be at all probable to LE, I can't think that the public is safe.
The Internet Crimes Against Children Task Force was involved in that so I'm assuming the phone was in not the best shape. Moo
I hadn't been a member here or knew much about this case, but then I saw a YouTube video that I thought might help out here, and I wanted to mention it to you. But as I go about life, I think of various aspects and possibilities of this, and if this has already been brought up, my apologies. I haven't been a member here long, only a month, I haven't seen most of what you have gone through, written and considered. I've only been in this thread.
I don't know anything about either of these girls, so please forgive my comments, they aren't meant to offend, I'm just throwing different suggestions out there.
I'm under the impression most of you believe the killer is an adult. Not a tall teenage boy, is that correct? Several of you talk about various jobs the person might hold. You say the killer had a lot of anger towards Libby. (I don't know where you get this, so if this isn't a generally considered possibility, my apologies).
If this killer is a reasonably intelligent adult, what could Libby know about him to cause him to be angry enough to kill her and Abby? Was this 'anger in the moment' or anger as in he's allowed his anger to fester and grow? I would think it would have to be some kind of major crime for him to be willing to kill two innocent young girls. Has anyone really thought about what she could 'have on the guy' to drive him to kill not just her but Abby, too? Are they supposed to have known this guy's name, or did Libby see or hear something the guy did, or did the killer just think that? Did he do something to Libby, or to someone she knows? (Did Libby or Abby babysit?) Could he have sexually assaulted someone and she knew about it? Could he have made sexual advances to someone underage and he believed she saw/heard/was aware of it?
Could these murders be related to some sort of sexual advances the killer made to an underage female or could he even have molested a young child the girls may have known?
Several years ago, I talked to various friends on AOL or AIM IMs, and I accidently found someone (an adult male) I knew in chat rooms there while I was waiting for a friend to log on. (He didn't know who I was and he hit on me, so I talked to him to see where he planned to take the chat. He was married to someone I knew). He was having explicit conversations in instant messages and in emails. I did a little investigating, and even though a few of his 'chat partners' claimed to be over 18, I discovered they were no more than 12 or 13. I was angry at the position the girls put themselves in. They could easily have gotten into a really precarious situation. I wished I could have called up their mothers. These ones were lying about their ages, (I read some of the things and emails), but so was the guy. He was claiming to be younger than he was, oh, and not married. I've seen some of the videos where the men believe they're going to meet a 13 year old or so and it's an undercover cop. I think those guys deserve to get caught.
I was an adult, and I had other training besides being an investigator, before the internet. But the training always helps.
Could someone Libby knew have had personal knowledge of some adult male being involved with an underage female and the killer was worried about his 'family life' being in jeopardy?
Or could this guy have already accidentally or purposely killed someone else and believed Libby or Abby could place him at that crime scene.
Also, you would know better than me, but what crimes occurred in the several months prior to these murders that BG could have had something to do with?
As another thought, is there a sex trafficking problem in Indiana? Child?
What about drugs? A drug ring in the Delphi area?
of course, this is more likely than any other scenario in my view, however, LE had the opportunity to take the computers and cell phones investigate with the FBI they should have all this info already shouldn't they..I would think so, I have said this before I don't believe this was a random attack but indeed one of opportunity not to get back at the girls but to rather continue the sick spree this SK is committing and will most likely do so again, I have said this before that I believe the best way to solve this is to go back and re do everything again with new detectives and LE from another state entirely, hand it over to others, something is not lining up here, someone needs to do something before this person strikes again, and it looks to me like the fbi should be involved ad take over completely since this is about safety
The Internet Crimes Against Children Task Force was involved in that so I'm assuming the phone was in not the best shape. Moo
I hadn't been a member here or knew much about this case, but then I saw a YouTube video that I thought might help out here, and I wanted to mention it to you. But as I go about life, I think of various aspects and possibilities of this, and if this has already been brought up, my apologies. I haven't been a member here long, only a month, I haven't seen most of what you have gone through, written and considered. I've only been in this thread.
I don't know anything about either of these girls, so please forgive my comments, they aren't meant to offend, I'm just throwing different suggestions out there.
I'm under the impression most of you believe the killer is an adult. Not a tall teenage boy, is that correct? Several of you talk about various jobs the person might hold. You say the killer had a lot of anger towards Libby. (I don't know where you get this, so if this isn't a generally considered possibility, my apologies).
If this killer is a reasonably intelligent adult, what could Libby know about him to cause him to be angry enough to kill her and Abby? Was this 'anger in the moment' or anger as in he's allowed his anger to fester and grow? I would think it would have to be some kind of major crime for him to be willing to kill two innocent young girls. Has anyone really thought about what she could 'have on the guy' to drive him to kill not just her but Abby, too? Are they supposed to have known this guy's name, or did Libby see or hear something the guy did, or did the killer just think that? Did he do something to Libby, or to someone she knows? (Did Libby or Abby babysit?) Could he have sexually assaulted someone and she knew about it? Could he have made sexual advances to someone underage and he believed she saw/heard/was aware of it?
Could these murders be related to some sort of sexual advances the killer made to an underage female or could he even have molested a young child the girls may have known?
Several years ago, I talked to various friends on AOL or AIM IMs, and I accidently found someone (an adult male) I knew in chat rooms there while I was waiting for a friend to log on. (He didn't know who I was and he hit on me, so I talked to him to see where he planned to take the chat. He was married to someone I knew). He was having explicit conversations in instant messages and in emails. I did a little investigating, and even though a few of his 'chat partners' claimed to be over 18, I discovered they were no more than 12 or 13. I was angry at the position the girls put themselves in. They could easily have gotten into a really precarious situation. I wished I could have called up their mothers. These ones were lying about their ages, (I read some of the things and emails), but so was the guy. He was claiming to be younger than he was, oh, and not married. I've seen some of the videos where the men believe they're going to meet a 13 year old or so and it's an undercover cop. I think those guys deserve to get caught.
I was an adult, and I had other training besides being an investigator, before the internet. But the training always helps.
Could someone Libby knew have had personal knowledge of some adult male being involved with an underage female and the killer was worried about his 'family life' being in jeopardy?
Or could this guy have already accidentally or purposely killed someone else and believed Libby or Abby could place him at that crime scene.
Also, you would know better than me, but what crimes occurred in the several months prior to these murders that BG could have had something to do with?
As another thought, is there a sex trafficking problem in Indiana? Child?
What about drugs? A drug ring in the Delphi area?
of course, this is more likely than any other scenario in my view, however, LE had the opportunity to take the computers and cell phones investigate with the FBI they should have all this info already shouldn't they..I would think so, I have said this before I don't believe this was a random attack but indeed one of opportunity not to get back at the girls but to rather continue the sick spree this SK is committing and will most likely do so again, I have said this before that I believe the best way to solve this is to go back and re do everything again with new detectives and LE from another state entirely, hand it over to others, something is not lining up here, someone needs to do something before this person strikes again, and it looks to me like the fbi should be involved ad take over completely since this is about safety. I believe it was mentioned one girl was hurt more than the other but that mayjust be a rumour there is no proof that we know of, if this were true it could be that L was protecting A and the POI attacked her released anger whatever, but this is sidetracking because we don't have the details of the crime scene nor will we ever, its best to discuss what we do know, what we know isthat IMO they messed up this investigation and have to go back redo everything and hand it over to someone else. TBH I don't trust anyone in that town currently to head this investigation. IMHO
POI are always online hunting for kids, wherever kids have access to programs to chat or interact with others that is an opportunity to do this and groom them then meet up with them. My daughter used to be on ROBLOX and I would pull up a chair beside her, she would just stare at me, I knew that she was up to something and there was more than likely pimps of sex trafficking on these sites trying to groom these kids or girls into the sex trade, then bully and threaten them if they tell or leave they can get pics of them and blackmail them. Better to not allow this kind of communication and if you do educate your kids on POI online and sex trafficking. My daughter grew out of Roblox but I could see how that and other programs like that, that are popular could create issues with safety. Parents should always be present when kids are on the internet and if they cant be certain programs should not be used. These predators are professionals when it comes to luring and grooming kids especially online, as they pretend they are kids themselves.They said the opposite IMO. Know what your kids are up to IIRC.
They have a voice recording of the POI plus partial fingerprints and DNA plus video. Why is this not solved? Somethings not adding up IMO
There is a newspaper article posted upthread several pages back.Where was it stated that they have partial fingerprints?? I don't recall reading that . Can you clarify the source?