I thought so too. I bet it has spooked a few people in Delphi.
I went back and saw you had referenced this also.
It just seemed very specific and somewhat out of context.
I thought so too. I bet it has spooked a few people in Delphi.
Why would putting the sketch and video still together on a poster suggest that LE had identified BG? I don't follow that logic at all. If LE had identified BG, they wouldn't have needed to release another sketch. The second sketch being paired with the video means that LE has a credible eyewitness and that LE believes that the person seen by the eyewitness was actually BG (perhaps based on the witnesses's description of the clothing).
Sketches are more like a BOLO type thing, its another tool to help solve a crime, or identify a potential suspect.
In this case, we have video of "Someone" who may or may not be involved in the girls murder. but other than what hes possibly wearing on his body , his face is totally skewed.
The initial sketch and the secondary sketch look nothing alike , I think in this case, it hurts the investigation because, which one are we looking for ?
IMO they released, info WAY too slowly, they took too long to let info out there, they shouldve released that video as son as they had it, audio the same, they should reveal the manner of death as well that may spark someones memory as to what may have happpened
Small things can be kept out of the public light , but all we know is this
2 girls went into the woods, both were murdered, a video and audio recording of a man were on Libbys phone
Thats IT!
I will say this again, SOMEONE out there knows who did this they are just refusing to say anythig or theyre not putting 2 and 2 together because so little is known about the murders.
If they released lets say manner of death that may helpsomeone remember something "oh yeah I saw my neighbor with blood on his clothes but he said he hit a deer" kinda thing
I know you have to weed stuff out but the more you give the public to think about the more helpful it is
I'd be equally interested in who *left* the press conference once they determined they would have to sign in. In every search and recovery effort I have participated in, we have been required to show ID.During the April 2019 press conference Supt. Carter said: To the killer, who may be in this room..
I thought that was strange. According to a news report I heard later, LE asked everyone to sign in to the press conference. Why would LE think the killer would sign in to a press conference about his crime?
I thought maybe there were two reasons for asking everyone to sign in:
1. They wanted to see if anyone would write down a fake name.
2. They wanted to examine the handwriting on the sign-in sheet. But unless the killer left a note at the crime scene they would have nothing to compare it to. Since left-handed writers tend to have a unique slant to their writing, I thought maybe they were looking for people who attended the press conference that were left-handed.
But I cannot prove any of this with any sort of logical argument.
During the April 2019 press conference Supt. Carter said: To the killer, who may be in this room..
I thought that was strange. According to a news report I heard later, LE asked everyone to sign in to the press conference. Why would LE think the killer would sign in to a press conference about his crime?
I thought maybe there were two reasons for asking everyone to sign in:
1. They wanted to see if anyone would write down a fake name.
2. They wanted to examine the handwriting on the sign-in sheet. But unless the killer left a note at the crime scene they would have nothing to compare it to. Since left-handed writers tend to have a unique slant to their writing, I thought maybe they were looking for people who attended the press conference that were left-handed.
But I cannot prove any of this with any sort of logical argument.
I agree about the suv and that points toward a SK and possibly why all the billboards went up nationwide with BG’s picture and description.MOO. ISP called in GBI to help and GBI resurfaced that 2/17/17 sketch from early days in the investigation.
What about a dark SUV with decals?
MOO
That SUV would have been found or been reported as a neighbor having one very quickly.
The SUV may have been identified as belonging to one of the trail users who has been cleared.I agree about the suv and that points toward a SK and possibly why all the billboards went up nationwide with BG’s picture and description.
Why do you think Kelsi chose now to reveal that?The SUV may have been identified as belonging to one of the trail users who has been cleared.
The SUV may have been identified as belonging to one of the trail users who has been cleared.
I'd be equally interested in who *left* the press conference once they determined they would have to sign in. In every search and recovery effort I have participated in, we have been required to show ID.
Amateur opinion and speculation
Hope you are right.
Thank you so much for your contribution here. I speak for others I’m sure! Your input is much appreciated.Sketches are more like a BOLO type thing, its another tool to help solve a crime, or identify a potential suspect.
In this case, we have video of "Someone" who may or may not be involved in the girls murder. but other than what hes possibly wearing on his body , his face is totally skewed.
The initial sketch and the secondary sketch look nothing alike , I think in this case, it hurts the investigation because, which one are we looking for ?
IMO they released, info WAY too slowly, they took too long to let info out there, they shouldve released that video as son as they had it, audio the same, they should reveal the manner of death as well that may spark someones memory as to what may have happpened
Small things can be kept out of the public light , but all we know is this
2 girls went into the woods, both were murdered, a video and audio recording of a man were on Libbys phone
Thats IT!
I will say this again, SOMEONE out there knows who did this they are just refusing to say anythig or theyre not putting 2 and 2 together because so little is known about the murders.
If they released lets say manner of death that may helpsomeone remember something "oh yeah I saw my neighbor with blood on his clothes but he said he hit a deer" kinda thing
I know you have to weed stuff out but the more you give the public to think about the more helpful it is
Possibly. However, the people you mentioned seem to have arrived after Abby and Libby. We don't know much (if anything) about the people who used the trail that day but left before anyone realized that Abby and Libby were missing. A number of people probably came forward and acknowledged having used the trail that day. The SUV with the decals may have been matched to one of them.Who would they have been? The historical trails to rails guy wasn't there yet, nor the lady photographer. The couple under the bridge?
Shoe prints probably would have been obliterated by the searchers. Any shoe prints that survived the search-and-rescue effort would have been gone the first time it rained.Has anyone tried standing in the same place Libby was filming, determined which beams he stood on and tried it for shoe-prints?
I don’t know if this had been discussed but of all of the witnesses who described seeing BG on the trails, and those who Derrick German asked whether or not they had seen the girls, did any of the witnesses describe seeing the girls on the trails or the bridge at all?
I wonder how far ahead they were (assuming they were ahead of him) on the trails. If they had already seen a ‘creepy’ guy, as was said in an interview with Becky Patty, I wonder if they saw other people too. How close were the two encounters with BG and where do they fit in the timeline of the witnesses who also saw BG?
Has anyone tried standing in the same place Libby was filming, determined which beams he stood on and tried it for shoe-prints?
IDK? Opportunity?Why do you think Kelsi chose now to reveal that?