KAK waiting in a car during the crime? Absolutely not.Did it ever come up in that 190 page interrogation? Where's our folks with great memories?
KAK waiting in a car during the crime? Absolutely not.Did it ever come up in that 190 page interrogation? Where's our folks with great memories?
Wow. I wonder who they determined the "first person" to be, then.Thank you for linking this.
I have also linked it before and transcribed part of it previously.
Important details coming from Anna Williams.
Around 8 mins in:
AW: "What we were told when we were brought in to see the second sketches..... we've run this first sketch....we feel like we know who this person might be, or we've cleared up this particular person and now we are going to look at another person that other people also noticed might have been there that day and now we would like to talk to that person."
A moment later she goes on to say what LE communicated to her about the change in direction:
AW:"Now we want to see who else may have seen this person because we have talked to everybody else concerning the first person."
Things that make you go hmmmm.
JMO
JMOWow. I wonder who they determined the "first person" to be, then.
Yep.JMO
CE
(Arrested Jan 8, 2019l
And he just happened to be there and spotted that day? Or is involved?JMO
CE
(Arrested Jan 8, 2019)
And he just happened to be there and spotted that day? Or is involved?
That's pretty much what I think too.KAK waiting in a car during the crime? Absolutely not.
JMO
CE
(Arrested Jan 8, 2019)
I have a bit of a problem with MS; I find they often use trigger words within a statement containing a lot of wiggle room. For instance, when they were talking about what KAK said about the red jeep, she began with "in a nutshell" so we have no idea what else he said.G
Thank you. I thought I was the only one unsure about the red Jeep. The first time I listened I was tired so I listened again. And now I’ll have to listen once more because I’m surprised reading here how so many others interpreted it.
I also respect the MS podcast. They know that some don’t and today’s episode included some clarification from them (again) on why they are focused on the Klines. They aren’t just choosing that angle — it is the only active angle in the case right now and has been since they began podcasting about this case. I think anyone who thinks they don’t deserve some respect could do the fair thing and listen at least to that part of today’s episode.
This is a valid criticism of MS, one of the few genuine ones I’ve seen. I’m sure it’s hard to rein themselves in if they are sitting on info like some suspect they may be. I hope MS will be extra vigilant with their writing as we do tend to parse every word around here.I have a bit of a problem with MS; I find they often use trigger words within a statement containing a lot of wiggle room. For instance, when they were talking about what KAK said about the red jeep, she began with "in a nutshell" so we have no idea what else he said.
So we jump from this: " "in a nutshell, while a different other person was committing the murders of Abigail Williams and Liberty German, that Kegan Kline himself was waiting in a red jeep vehicle" to thinking it was a confession of some sort.
And then they throw this in "if (Kegan Kline) says John Doe committed the murders..." some of us may choose to overlook that it may just an example. Then, they use the word "witness' and that takes us farther down the path.
Now the issue becomes 'are they dropping clues or just stimulating our interest?'
He's an attorney and should be fully aware of where his podcasts lead the listeners. I think we have a tendency to not listen carefully and just hear the trigger words.This is a valid criticism of MS, one of the few genuine ones I’ve seen. I’m sure it’s hard to rein themselves in if they are sitting on info like some suspect they may be. I hope MS will be extra vigilant with their writing as we do tend to parse every word around here.
His look and character: very fitting. But I wonder.JMO
CE
(Arrested Jan 8, 2019)
yes...this is one of the many things that makes zero sense in this caseThank you for linking this.
I have also linked it before and transcribed part of it previously.
Important details coming from Anna Williams.
Around 8 mins in:
AW: "What we were told when we were brought in to see the second sketches..... we've run this first sketch....we feel like we know who this person might be, or we've cleared up this particular person and now we are going to look at another person that other people also noticed might have been there that day and now we would like to talk to that person."
A moment later she goes on to say what LE communicated to her about the change in direction:
AW:"Now we want to see who else may have seen this person because we have talked to everybody else concerning the first person."
Things that make you go hmmmm.
JMO
Forgive my ignorance, but if he was arrested, and this is on public record and likely public news reports on this arrest, why can't his name be said or a link shared?JMO
CE
(Arrested Jan 8, 2019)
Forgive my ignorance, but if he was arrested, and this is on public record and likely public news reports on this arrest, why can't his name be said or a link shared?
Not trying to be difficult, just trying to get a grasp on things here, still.
I am not 100 percent sure, but my guess is that since he has turned out to have no link to Delphi and the murders of A&L, we can't put his information out there.
If there were a thread about him or his case- it would be relevant.
JMO
I feel there was a statewide clean up going on parallel to the Delphi case for at least 18 months and then "out of the blue" a few crumbs emerged and lead to A-Shots persona a little later on in the open investigation. Quoting, “The only positive result from these actions is it keeps this open investigation in the mind of the public," he continued. Charles Andrew Eldridge, 46, was arrested on January 8 during an undercover sting in Union City,"His look and character: very fitting. But I wonder.
MOO, but I really pray today is the day and I get the feeling (MOO) that we will see an arrest within the week. The next few days will be busy ones here on this thread if I'm right. Sitting right here ( and on my hands) praying for justice for two innocent girls destroyed by evil.This is a valid criticism of MS, one of the few genuine ones I’ve seen. I’m sure it’s hard to rein themselves in if they are sitting on info like some suspect they may be. I hope MS will be extra vigilant with their writing as we do tend to parse every word around here.
That’s fair criticism. That episode was one they said they winged and probably not all the words came out right. I know it wasn’t all clear to me. They chose fast over good production that time. But, in general, I don’t think they are trying to drop clues but just tell us what they can in a pretty objective way. But what they can tell us has its limits, as does what they can be sure about themselves.I have a bit of a problem with MS; I find they often use trigger words within a statement containing a lot of wiggle room. For instance, when they were talking about what KAK said about the red jeep, she began with "in a nutshell" so we have no idea what else he said.
So we jump from this: " "in a nutshell, while a different other person was committing the murders of Abigail Williams and Liberty German, that Kegan Kline himself was waiting in a red jeep vehicle" to thinking it was a confession of some sort.
And then they throw this in "if (Kegan Kline) says John Doe committed the murders..." some of us may choose to overlook that it may just an example. Then, they use the word "witness' and that takes us farther down the path.
Now the issue becomes 'are they dropping clues or just stimulating our interest?'