Bemused,
I have been trying to reply to your quote but cannot get post quick reply box to work. Will try again later. Mercedes
When that happens to me I have to reload the page.
Bemused,
I have been trying to reply to your quote but cannot get post quick reply box to work. Will try again later. Mercedes
IMHO RL left his property on 2/13 during the time of those murders because he had prior knowledge that something was going to be happening back there. I believe someone told him to be gone and that is how the person got to the bridge and back to his car was through RL's property / the cemetery. I believe the SW was a last ditch effort to make the person / persons responsible think that RL was in jail talking. The SW came a month after the crimes, I still have no idea why every inch of RL's property and that entire wooded trail area was not searched with a fine tooth comb immediately after the bodies were found.
Yep that's the one.
I do believe it came from a link we clicked on in here.
Did he drive on the 15th?
Do u really think this man would leave his home because someone told him something was going down?
Did he drive on the 15th?
I think his statement was he'd gone to town but I don't recall how he said he got to town and back or that he mentioned it.
Yes, they were found on his property, that is what I would assume would happen if it were my own property. Then you have sw laws and stuff I don't understand . But I still wonder about BG footprints.and where they led to. Unanswerable question ik.imo
If he had not done the news interviews we would not know who this man is.
Sad to convict a guy cause he wears the same clothes.
IMO his voice does not sound like BG.
Oh I see. Hmmm. Well does the question still work? What if (just for sake of theory), RL was walking the trails with his dog or walking back from the transfer station or something? He could've passed the girls on the trail by the bridge and become angry at what he found vs. having to pursue them from his property.
Someone could come upon the girls, tell them they shouldn't be on the bridge etc and become angry and disciplinarian-like right there. It didn't have to start from RL's property.
Just thinking... feel free to poke holes in that.
IMHO RL left his property on 2/13 during the time of those murders because he had prior knowledge that something was going to be happening back there. I believe someone told him to be gone and that is how the person got to the bridge and back to his car was through RL's property / the cemetery. I believe the SW was a last ditch effort to make the person / persons responsible think that RL was in jail talking. The SW came a month after the crimes, I still have no idea why every inch of RL's property and that entire wooded trail area was not searched with a fine tooth comb immediately after the bodies were found.
If he had not done the news interviews we would not know who this man is.
Sad to convict a guy cause he wears the same clothes.
IMO his voice does not sound like BG.
Here's a line of thought I'd love to get people to speculate about more.
We know LE had already listened to/watched the recording BEFORE they served the search warrants.
So while that still doesn't tell us what was on the video, maybe (theoretically) we can guess as to what theories the content excluded?
For example, after watching and listening to the phone call, LE seemed to believe it was worthwhile to interview and search the homes and property of several locals. Does that mean whatever they saw or heard did NOT suggest a professional or serial killer?
Does it mean what they heard or saw of the perp was consistent with someone who was familiar with the local area?
If the killer in the video clearly seemed like an outsider with a kill kit who had plotted the whole thing and targeted the girls in a series of kills, would they be wasting resources searching the homes of these locals?
I am just curious what jumps out at you when you think about this.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Interesting theory.So in your mind, someone in RL's life tipped him off to vacate the premises? I wonder why they trusted he wouldn't reveal that to police if so...
Hmmm. Not sure if this theory holds weight for me, but I will watch to see how you develop it!
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
That is not why LE stated they served a PC SW on the 17th of March. Kim Riley said it was due to tips and interviews they'd developed since the murders so LE did not wait 5 weeks because they wanted to. They need probable cause that satisfies a judge.
Bumping! I really wanted to hear some other ideas if anyone has them!
I don't care if you agree with me. Would still like to hear other thoughts.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
If he had not done the news interviews we would not know who this man is.
Sad to convict a guy cause he wears the same clothes.
IMO his voice does not sound like BG.
If it was RL and he knew the girls family why would Libby not of said anything on the audio ?
This is the same girl who had the foresight to record the killer as she was so scared. It seems like a big omission not to say who the killer is if you know the person walking towards you.
:moo: