- Joined
- Feb 9, 2009
- Messages
- 553
- Reaction score
- 3,906
Ummm, what state is this? I am just wondering how we all missed it?
Sorry, trying to get it posted ASAP! Watauga County is in North Carolina. I'll go try and edit my post.
Ummm, what state is this? I am just wondering how we all missed it?
I am recording Nancy's show tonight and will upload it to my YouTube channel after the show. http://www.youtube.com/Sierra1947
Just saw this in our local news saying that MP WAS a sex offender.
http://www.goblueridge.net/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=14218
"Sheriff Len Hagaman said that Michael Plumadore was in Watauga and registered as a sex offender on November 29th of 2007 when found by a sex offender check, and found him to be a fugitive from Indiana at that time."
Sorry, trying to get it posted ASAP! Watauga County is in North Carolina. I'll go try and edit my post.
Having a FB account was really the least of this girl's problems. She was living in a trailer park full of sex offenders! Facebook has rules, she and her family did not follow them.
I can't find MP on the national sex registry. I am wondering if the article has it wrong. Still checking.
http://www.nsopw.gov/Core/OffenderSearchCriteria.aspx
Just saw this in our local news saying that MP WAS a sex offender.
http://www.goblueridge.net/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=14218
"Sheriff Len Hagaman said that Michael Plumadore was in Watauga and registered as a sex offender on November 29th of 2007 when found by a sex offender check, and found him to be a fugitive from Indiana at that time."
ETA: This is in Boone, North Carolina. One of the safest and most beautiful places to live...can't believe this <I will modsnip myself> lived here.
![]()
A registered sex offender, now charged with the unspeakable murder and dismemberment of a 9-year old, girl, has a history in Watauga County, North Carolina
Woot Woot!!!
where's that National Registry?
Is this Go Blue Ridge a radio station?
Thanks. Great post. As always you give me something to think about and learn. On this topic my opinion is pretty well settled and I bet you would even agree with some of it.
I think we need to reevaluate how we classify, register and restrict these guys. Lifetime RSO status for a nineteen year old who had sex with his fifteen year old girlfriend seems a bit over the top, as does labeling as sex offenders middle school boys who peek up girls dresses or try to sneak a kiss (I have read news accounts of ridiculous crap like this), or the guy arrested for going to the bathroom outside. We have all seen stories like this, and uncommon or not (I have no idea) they diminish the value of these lists, thin the attention of law enforcement, place unnecessary and unreasonable restrictions on lower status RSOs, and all too often force RSOs into hiding -- which is exactly what we don't want.
Finally, there is again the very real question of how well they actually work. Obviously, they do sometimes, and this would be a very tricky question to answer as a crime prevented is (obviously) unreported.
However, an argument could certainly be made that these lists might provide a false sense of security to parents and serve to direct attention away from the very people MOST likely to harm their child -- that child's own family and friends. LE isn't fooled, they know where to look after the fact, but the ideal solution is to stop the crime before it occurs. That means educating the public that the greatest danger to any child is listed not in the RSO registry, but in the address book on the parent's phone.
Anyway, thanks again for your post.![]()
Ummm, what state is this? I am just wondering how we all missed it?