Sparklin
New Member
- Joined
- May 5, 2009
- Messages
- 1,399
- Reaction score
- 3
The Irwins were paid for that interview, so I suspect that they prepared the timeline. Why wouldn't they just say that Samantha also saw the baby at some point later that night? They specifically said that samantha saw her at 4:30, in her crib. Why say that if it is incorrect? Why not say she was seen at 10 pm when Samantha was leaving?That would be more helpful to them. But for some reason all they have verified is that samantha LAST SAW HER at 4:30, even though she was there herself until around 10 pm. Hinky, imo.
I believe that timeline came from an unnamed, close to the family, 'source'. I could have given them info for all we know.