Inconsistencies in DB's Story

[SyraKelly]

Ok, thanks. I will assume that LE has looked at his phone records and knows where he was during that time. Depending on how close he was, he still might be a possible SODDI. But remember we are talking about a mere 27minutes between 11:30pm and when the attempted phone call to MW was made at 11:57pm.

and the first eyewitness to see the man with the baby...

 

[Whisperer]

DB told me she had a buzz. I questioned how drunk she was. She said she was not to the point of passing out. Again, for what it's worth. She said there was wine left over and the LE measured the amount. See you all later. I'm headed out to brave the snowy/icy roads to serve a few summonses.

Now we have a buzz..good grief. Now she is not passed out or blacked out. She is BUZZED!!!

 

[SyraKelly]

Now we have a buzz..good grief. Now she is not passed out or blacked out. She is BUZZED!!!

YES..Is there a difference in a buzz and being drunk..I think so!!! Not according to DB I bet

 

[Donjeta]

That's because her definition of lights being on, JI's definition of lights being on, and your definition of lights being on is not the same. It's their house, so perhaps there is an understanding when one says 'the lights are on'. Their understanding (at least DB's) is the lights do not entail those that are always on to begin with. Did the early interviews clarify which lights she 'turned off'. If she said in the beginning, I turned every light off and then the follow up question was 'what about night lights' and she said 'they were off', then you got something.

If so then it makes even less sense than it did before.

If the lights that were on only entail the lights that are always on, and the lights that were turned off were still off when JI came home then why on earth was the lights being on presented as evidence of a strange occurrence pointing to an intruder?

Why did Jeremy make a fuss about the lights that are always on to begin with being on? Hasn't he ever noticed that these lights are always on?

JMO but only deceptive people or people with feeble understanding would respond a question about turning the lights off that follows a discussion about lights that were strangely turned on during the night by referring to some other lights that they turned off.

 

[Donjeta]

Don't you think that would of come out of the boys' interviews to LE?

Very probably but any mention of their last sighting of Lisa has been very conspicuously omitted everywhere that I've seen.

 

[hambirg]

Facing the Irwin house, on which side does SB live/d?

I believe it's the house to the left.

If so then it makes even less sense than it did before.

If the lights that were on only entail the lights that are always on, and the lights that were turned off were still off when JI came home then why on earth was the lights being on presented as evidence of a strange occurrence pointing to an intruder?

Exactly!

 

[SyraKelly]

If so then it makes even less sense than it did before.

If the lights that were on only entail the lights that are always on, and the lights that were turned off were still off when JI came home then why on earth was the lights being on presented as evidence of a strange occurrence pointing to an intruder?

Excellent post-This is the whole light issue in a nutshell to me!!

 

[Whisperer]

Don't you think that would of come out of the boys' interviews to LE?

not necessarily. I don't think they would have an accurate account of time. The first responders would get more truth from then immediately after the crime than the second interview which was videotaped, and watched by parents and attorneys...two months later. Interviewer HAD to be approved by Joe T and his team.

My guess is nothing came out of the second Interview. How could it? The boys were prepped and watched by Eagle eyes. And if anything was gleaned, Joe T. is there to fit whatever they said to a new and improved story.

 

[Whisperer]

Parents caught in another lie. The lights were a red herring, as are the phones, the drinking, and the window screen.

 

[SyraKelly]

Parents caught in another lie. The lights were a red herring, as are the phones, the drinking, and the window screen.

But they realized the light thing was so unbelievable-they have now backed off of it and replaced with a believable story!!JMO

 

[dog.gone.cute]

Read RR's comments. SB doesn't like/drink wine, hence her going out for herself.

:seeya: TY ... I saw RR's comments about the "wine" AFTER I posted ...

:waitasec: Hmmm ... I wonder if RR can tell us if Deb's brother was at Deb's house -- or SB's house -- having some "cocktails" with girls ?

:seeya:

 

[iamnotagolem]

Ron,
I have a question for you. Why is DB willing to talk to you and no one else? Did her attorney meet with you and clear you as someone she can talk to?

 

[dog.gone.cute]

Don't you think that would of come out of the boys' interviews to LE?

Yes -- but -- remember how long it took for Deb and JI to AGREE with LE to have the boys interviewed ...

:waitasec: And JMO ... that makes me wonder if the boys were "coached" ...

Unfortunately, LE is not sharing anything at all with the public -- and for sure they are not going to share what the "minor children" had to say ...

:innocent: Sure wish they would share "something" ... even if it is a "crumb" ...

MOO ...

 

[In da Middle]

Where did you hear the rumor about the Jersey alibi? Just curious.

Key words - heavily rumored. Where is this stated as fact?

 

[cityslick]

not necessarily. I don't think they would have an accurate account of time. The first responders would get more truth from then immediately after the crime than the second interview which was videotaped, and watched by parents and attorneys...two months later. Interviewer HAD to be approved by Joe T and his team.

My guess is nothing came out of the second Interview. How could it? The boys were prepped and watched by Eagle eyes. And if anything was gleaned, Joe T. is there to fit whatever they said to a new and improved story.

It could of been a simple question of:

While you were watching tv and while your mommy was outside, did you see/hear your baby sister? I think the older boy would be able to answer this with some sort of clarity, especially in the first interview.

Also, to clarify, that 2nd interview came a month later, not two. Also, the interviewer was an FBI appointed person, with years of experience.

 

[cityslick]

Yes -- but -- remember how long it took for Deb and JI to AGREE with LE to have the boys interviewed ...

:waitasec: And JMO ... that makes me wonder if the boys were "coached" ...

Unfortunately, LE is not sharing anything at all with the public -- and for sure they are not going to share what the "minor children" had to say ...

:innocent: Sure wish they would share "something" ... even if it is a "crumb" ...

MOO ...

They were interviewed twice, once in the beginning and once a month later. Also, the FBI interviewer (from what I read) are trained in scenarios when interviewing children and if they are 'coached'. If they simply were reciting script lines, I think the interviewer would of caught it.

 

[In da Middle]

not necessarily. I don't think they would have an accurate account of time. The first responders would get more truth from then immediately after the crime than the second interview which was videotaped, and watched by parents and attorneys...two months later. Interviewer HAD to be approved by Joe T and his team.

My guess is nothing came out of the second Interview. How could it? The boys were prepped and watched by Eagle eyes. And if anything was gleaned, Joe T. is there to fit whatever they said to a new and improved story.

How would the boys not know when they saw her last. They were IMMEDIATELY interviewed that day. If they didn't know the answer to that simple question why was everybody so mad that they weren't re-interviewed for a while? Doesn't make sense.

 

[In da Middle]

Ron,
I have a question for you. Why is DB willing to talk to you and no one else? Did her attorney meet with you and clear you as someone she can talk to?

who is nobody? jim Spellman has stated he has talked to her also.

 

[iamnotagolem]

It could of been a simple question of:

While you were watching tv and while your mommy was outside, did you see/hear your baby sister? I think the older boy would be able to answer this with some sort of clarity, especially in the first interview.

Also, to clarify, that 2nd interview came a month later, not two. Also, the interviewer was an FBI appointed person, with years of experience.

BBM, under normal circumstances, he probably would have, but they had a friend over, they had a new kitten to play with, he probably wasn't paying much attention to Lisa.

 

[Whisperer]

I'll tell you what's a coincidence1 LE taking the clothing that DB says Lisa was last wearing.