Inside the Mind of Casey Anthony: A Psychological Portrait by Keith Ablow, MD

Baez's media researcher made it very clear that George was targeted based on what she and her people found about the chat about George and their suspicions. There is no doubt about Baez's reasons at all.

Did his researchers name WS? I don't believe anything coming from the defense camp.

FCA accused Lee of being a molester before she killed Caylee. The p###s in the mouth was all JB and FCA. JB's opening statement was laughable and if a jury had been seated with two functioning brain cells they would have seen just that.

GA made himself a target because of his lies. I don't believe he is a child molester but I think he is a scammer, a liar, a thief (scamdations), and he covered for a baby killer. I feel the same way about the entire family.

As someone already mentioned, anyone can google all the youtube videos of him lying repeatedly.

After he found out Casey tortured Caylee to death these were his words at CAYLEE'S funeral:

...I miss my daughter Casey. Do not form any judgements because I'll tell ya you don't want to be in any of our family's shoes no matter what it is. Casey deserves prayer, she deserves understanding, she deserves love, she deserves letters. Take the time to write a letter to her. It could say hi Casey I'm thinking about you today. If you could do it for me I would love it, if you could do it for my son, for Cindy. Can you do it for Caylee?

Then he went on to give Kidfinders a plug.

He changed when he was targeted by the defense. I wish he would have had the same outrage at the killer of his grandchild but that's GA in a nutshell.

I guess he wasn't feeling the love after FCA targeted him.

IMO
 
First of all, I don't see a slow board as three is a crowd. And I have no problem with a discussion - I just don't think we should be perpetuating the "there's something not right with George" myth on a public board with words like sneaky and creepy. All IMO.

Just wanted to say I don't know how Dr. Ablow gets away with that kind of defamation either but the trial is over and no blame was attached to GA at all.

There is something not right about the whole family. They are all sneaky and creepy. Bat phones comes to mind immediately. Who does that when their grandchild is missing?

IMO
 
There is something not right about the whole family. They are all sneaky and creepy. Bat phones comes to mind immediately. Who does that when their grandchild is missing?

IMO

You have his number my friend. George was a part of the perfect storm that allowed KC to walk away a free woman.
 
There is something not right about the whole family. They are all sneaky and creepy. Bat phones comes to mind immediately. Who does that when their grandchild is missing?

IMO

Well then we are of different opinions. Did you read my comment as a defense of George? Wrong - it wasn't at all. I've consistently made my thoughts about George's actions pretty clear over the past three years.

It's one thing to discuss what a person has done that is documented. It's another situation to label that person's character with attributes IMO. We have a litany of what he did wrong over the last three years and continues to do that - what I am not comfortable with, and it's a personal preference because we continue to have individual choice that is our right, is to do ongoing name calling.
 
Finished the book last night. I think Ablow's theories are almost as fanciful as Casey's lies.

He implies that Casey is not aware of that she is lying, and that she actually believes her own lies. Hogwash. If Casey were not aware of her lies, why then did she say "I'm such a great liar!?"


if she believes them, then why does she quickly change and/or embellish the lies as she is called out?
 
if she believes them, then why does she quickly change and/or embellish the lies as she is called out?

Because it is a crock! There will always be advocates for the Anthony family. I have accepted that and take his book with the appropriate grain of salt.

I expect next we will see a book on how wonderful an attorney Baez is. I am ready for another laugh, aren't you?
 
I'm not sure what a HUGE fuss is being made about GA being in the delivery room. Not my cup of tea, but there are plenty of famlies where eveyone down to second cousins are in there, both male and female! Heck, I've even known women who have had their male best friends in there.

I know sex was what got me into the situation, but after several hours of labor and then finding out I needed a c-section, I really didn't care who wandered through the room. (and I gave birth in the hospital in which I worked) There was nothing sexual about getting that baby out of me, and I'm pretty sure my ex wasn't thinking about sex either!

I honestly don't remember. Was George down at the foot at the bed getting an eyefull or was he holding KC's hand, helping her push? Standing by her shoulders, ready to pass out or puke? Was he sitting on a chair in a corner cheering her on? Do we even know?

BBM. IMO, the author's take on GA being in the delivery room was because he is a Freudian. He refers to Freud throughout his book.
 
Well then we are of different opinions. Did you read my comment as a defense of George? Wrong - it wasn't at all. I've consistently made my thoughts about George's actions pretty clear over the past three years.

It's one thing to discuss what a person has done that is documented. It's another situation to label that person's character with attributes IMO. We have a litany of what he did wrong over the last three years and continues to do that - what I am not comfortable with, and it's a personal preference because we continue to have individual choice that is our right, is to do ongoing name calling.

BBM - No. I read your post as blaming WS for the defense. My post was highlighting why I thought WS had nothing to do with it.

BBM - I think it's a matter of semantics, what a person does makes up their character.

BBM - I like your choice of words 'individual choice'. The entire A family had the choice to stand for a murdered toddler, they chose to support her killer instead. I'm not going to pretend it didn't happen.

IMO
 
BBM - No. I read your post as blaming WS for the defense. My post was highlighting why I thought WS had nothing to do with it.

BBM - I think it's a matter of semantics, what a person does makes up their character.

BBM - I like your choice of words 'individual choice'. The entire A family had the choice to stand for a murdered toddler, they chose to support her killer instead. I'm not going to pretend it didn't happen.

IMO

I'm not willing to get into a freeforall here over my feelings post verdict about name calling. Re WS - it's a fact WS was read by the defense among other posters out there as I repeated see our comments reused on other sites. So while I don't think WS was wholly responsible for the defense, I can't see how we can avoid realizing our comments made a signifigant contribution. It's a bit like the case - take isolated events and they don't add up to guilt but the totality of it points to one thing only.

Your 2nd BBM completely ignores my overall comment. I have no intention of ignoring GA's contribution to the not guilty verdict. I never have and I never will.

Dr. Ablow apparently feels free to say whatever he wants, no matter what. I made a comment, a suggestion, and it was all IMO. That's it, that's all I wrote.
 
You have his number my friend. George was a part of the perfect storm that allowed KC to walk away a free woman.

Exactly. "I'd sell my soul to the devil to (get my daughter out of jail.)"

I don't recall the exact verbiage but there it is. JMO.
 
I'm not willing to get into a freeforall here over my feelings post verdict about name calling. Re WS - it's a fact WS was read by the defense among other posters out there as I repeated see our comments reused on other sites. So while I don't think WS was wholly responsible for the defense, I can't see how we can avoid realizing our comments made a signifigant contribution. It's a bit like the case - take isolated events and they don't add up to guilt but the totality of it points to one thing only.

Your 2nd BBM completely ignores my overall comment. I have no intention of ignoring GA's contribution to the not guilty verdict. I never have and I never will.

Dr. Ablow apparently feels free to say whatever he wants, no matter what. I made a comment, a suggestion, and it was all IMO. That's it, that's all I wrote.

I believe the WS "live comments" thread that I also posted on during the jury selection, trial, the daily threads that opened in the a.m. during trial, shut down for lunch, and re-opened where we all gave our thoughts on the live testimony as it was happening, were being perused by the DT "live' during the trial, to see the perception was of what was going on in "real time". This site would CRASH often, especially on the days of CA/GA testimony, so that there were times I could not get on, MANY MANY people were reading this site during that trial. DS was CONSTANTLY looking at a computer, the wife of that serial killer (all I can remember is looking at her from "behind" one day in a bright red suit :floorlaugh:. her name escapes me ) sat right up in front during jury selection on her computer the whole time, JB was CONSTANTLY being fed something on his cell phone, he barely even tried hiding it after a while, it would be naive(sp?) for me to think otherwise.

Not even blaming us, that is just what the world has come to now, with all of the social media, FB, twitter, forums, etc., anyone can get the "pulse" of a situation in real time. and that Amy Singer just came right out and said that is what the DT was doing, along with mining all of the internet to see which way the wind was blowing on any given day. **Since JA said in his book that OCA told him that GA was the one who actually murdered little Caylee while molesting her, JB KNEW that would not fly at all (although the Pinellas 12 may have welcomed that even MORESO than his other hogwash), so he completely made up (IMO), after reading much written on the internet, WS had to be included as there was so much on here to read, the drowning story and found a very willing CA to dig up some photos and testify so they could be entered at trial (not going to EVEN use the word "evidence" here about those photos, lol, I will be blasted out of here again :great: )

I FIRMLY believe this website was mined for very much info by the DT. Remember our thread, something along the lines, "what would you tell the DT to improve their case?", not quoting that name directly, can't remember the exact title, but they would be IDIOTS not to have read that. All of the general threads are available for the world to read, and IMO, the DT read here, simple as that. I expected nothing less from them, and I am sure they were reading wherever else intelligent people were discussing this case.

This is just how the world rolls at this time...... for years Presidential candidates and those in office took daily "Gallup" polls, sometimes hourly polls, to see where the wind was blowing and to take the "pulse" of the nation, world, etc., now they can just tweet about it and read follow-up tweets, FB forums, etc., etc., etc.

IMO, MOO, etc.
 
Exactly. "I'd sell my soul to the devil to (get my daughter out of jail.)"

I don't recall the exact verbiage but there it is. JMO.

Yes, precisely! He did say that and I notice you did not include a litany of how you describe this behaviour. I am not standing in defense of George!:banghead:

I apologize Oakley for using your post as an example....:seeya:
 
Exactly. "I'd sell my soul to the devil to (get my daughter out of jail.)"

I don't recall the exact verbiage but there it is. JMO.

I've said all along, someone in that family sold their soul to free her. There is no other explanation in my mind as to why she is free. Perfect storm is right.
 
Okay, I take the rap for this board being hijacked regarding George, since I asked if anyone else shared my observations that he appears sneaky and creepy which wasn't directly off topic but took the board in a less desirous direction.

Some agreed with my observation, some didn't,no problem either way as far as I am concerned.

Since this thread is on the book, maybe that is what we should be discussing?

JMO.
Thanks.
 
Okay, I take the rap for this board being hijacked regarding George, since I asked if anyone else shared my observations that he appears sneaky and creepy which wasn't directly off topic but took the board in a less desirous direction.

Some agreed with my observation, some didn't,no problem either way as far as I am concerned.

Since this thread is on the book, maybe that is what we should be discussing?

JMO.
Thanks.

Looking at the discussion in totality Bayouland, we are discussing whether or not Dr. Ablow has the right to continue to float information in an accusatory manner implying guilt with no solid facts being used to support his statements. And whether we have that right also to continue the mud slinging regarding how we feel about his character, rather than just discussing the deeds/actions we know for certain he has done, now the verdict has been rendered in a law court.
 
Okay, I take the rap for this board being hijacked regarding George, since I asked if anyone else shared my observations that he appears sneaky and creepy which wasn't directly off topic but took the board in a less desirous direction.

Some agreed with my observation, some didn't,no problem either way as far as I am concerned.

Since this thread is on the book, maybe that is what we should be discussing?

JMO.
Thanks.

Here let me help you...
Inside the Mind of Casey Anthony: I see marbles rolling around and they aren't even pretty, not even a pretty aggie. :seeya:
 
Looking at the discussion in totality Bayouland, we are discussing whether or not Dr. Ablow has the right to continue to float information in an accusatory manner implying guilt with no solid facts being used to support his statements. And whether we have that right also to continue the mud slinging regarding how we feel about his character, rather than just discussing the deeds/actions we know for certain he has done, now the verdict has been rendered in a law court.

The point I was and am referring to was the George Anthony discussion.
 
Here let me help you...
Inside the Mind of Casey Anthony: I see marbles rolling around and they aren't even pretty, not even a pretty aggie. :seeya:

Isn't that the truth :) Loose screws??????
 
I've said all along, someone in that family sold their soul to free her. There is no other explanation in my mind as to why she is free. Perfect storm is right.

What's worse is that every single one of the Anthony clan sold Caylee's soul in exchange for Casey's release, not "freedom".

Casey Marie Anthony will never be free.
 

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
210
Guests online
837
Total visitors
1,047

Forum statistics

Threads
625,967
Messages
18,517,239
Members
240,914
Latest member
CalvinJ
Back
Top