She did NOT "turn herself in". I truly wish this fallacy would not be repeated again and again as fact. LE went to her after they received a tip. This information has been linked in this thread. She is also a repeat offender, maybe different crimes, but repeat offender nonetheless. She strangled a 15 year odl girl while two men held her down by her arms!! Nothing about that makes her less of a killer then Casey if in fact Casey is guilty.
ETA: And Maya HAS been found guilty in a court of law, Casey is still "presumed innocent".
There ARE differences in murder just the same as there are differences in many crimes. A man kills his wife in the heat of the moment when he finds her in bed with another man, a bar fight breaks out and someone gets killed, a gang member murders another gang member, a mother kills her child. Although these ARE all murders they are not all the same.
Yes, Maya's crime is horrendous and she killed a 15 year old girl. They were fellow gang members, they were peers. They were involved in drugs. Maya was 17 years old. She ALSO was a refugee of WAR and a runaway at the age of 13. This is in NO way similar to what happened to Caylee Marie Anthony. She was a BABY, not a gang member.She did not CHOOSE a lifestyle which lead to her death. She was a BABY and her MOTHER murdered her in cold blood so she could go back to her party girl lifestyle. There is only one similarity in these cases, and that is, a human being is dead. Beyond that, they do not compare one to the other.
Maya DID turn herself in. She DID confess her crime and in the process of telling her story DID tell the entire story of those who were also involved and held this other girl down. If those guys had not assisted, this murder may not have happened. Although they did not do the actual choking, they are every bit as and perhaps even more responsible as Maya. Without them there, Angel might still be alive.
Maya is NOW helping other teens/children in an effort to attone in some way for the horrible and unforgivable thing that she did, as a 17 year old girl on drugs in a gang. She is not lying and saying she did nothing. She is facing her crime head on and cleansing her soul by TRUTH. Is this not what we WANT criminals to do? Do we not incarcerate them so they WILL be rehabilitated? Is that not one of the main goals OF our entire system, to rehabilitate criminals? :waitasec:
Once upon a time Maya was a despicable, horrible creature who had so little respect for human life that she took one. She was sentenced for her crime. She is serving her sentence. She is doing what she CAN from within those prison walls to change. She was judged and found guilty and sentenced to 30 years in prison. There is no changing this. And ALL inmates, unless there is a no possibility of parole, are hopeful of an early release for good behavior. It is how our system works. Someone CAN shave years off if they behave well while incarcerated. MOST cold blooded killers do not rehabilitate. Perhaps in this tragic case, one will. Perhaps it was the effects of being a refugee in a strange country and then a runaway and then a gang member and then a drug addict that lead this girl down this path. NOT SO KC ANTHONY.
KC has lived in a nice middle class home in the same neighborhood with the same parents her whole life. She has not seen the horrors of war up close, that might lead to emotional and mental instabilities. She is not in a strange country. She is not a runaway. She is not a gang member. She is "the girl next door" for all intents and purposes. She had a home where everything she and her child needed was provided. She was GIVEN a car. She had opportunity to attend college and do anything she wanted. What did she want? She wanted to be free. She wanted to NOT be held down and bound by a baby. She wanted rid of Caylee. So she got what she wanted. BUT...
she didn't want to be held accountable. She wanted to walk away scott free. She did not want to be punished. She just wanted to be left to go about her business. LUCKILY for CAYLEE, her victim, this is not how things work in this country. You cannot just say, as Susan Smith did, "A man stole my car and my kids", or as KC did, "The nanny took my baby" and NOT have that investigated. IF the nanny DID take your baby? Then you can GUARANTEE there will be some evidence of that. There was PLENTY of evidence in Mayas case. So where is all of the evidence of this nanny? There is no nanny. KC is the nanny. KC is the killer. KC must pay JUST LIKE MAYA. :banghead: