Sherbie
Active Member
- Joined
- Feb 26, 2005
- Messages
- 1,888
- Reaction score
- 16
I'm still not sure I am seeing what the huge deal about this "revelation" is. he is a county worker, with a regular route, who knew the child was missing. I would be willing to bet that all county workers in that area were briefed to keep their eyes out. he knew his area was immediately local to Caylee's home. he may also have been playing a bit of amateur sleuth (the same as we all do here, just local). So he called in anything in the neighborhood that seemed out of place. A stray bag by the road, or an odd smell. Possibly something about the area bothered him.
And you know what. He was right.
I am not seeing the controversy here. A county worker did his job, and kept his eyes open and reported what he thought was relevant. Isn't this the sort of thing that post 9/11 we expect our public employees to be? Situationally aware of the area's that they operate in?
Good post. I agree with you and with Coastal.
This isn't going to give the defense any sort of advantage. Regardless how many times the meter reader called or whether LE missed finding Caylee when responding, the sheer volume of forensic evidence from the remains, bag, tape and other items (in addition to the evidence already analyzed) will totally bury Casey Anthony.
As far as her guilt is concerned, it won't matter whether someone else may have moved the remains (and I don't believe for a second they did) because there will still be ample evidence to prove that Casey murdered her daughter. Suggesting or trying to prove that SODDI because a bag may have been moved won't negate the evidence against her for the actual murder itself. Won't even come close to raising reasonable doubt, IMO.