Identified! Jane Doe 43, WhtFem, 20-30, critical info re: exploitation of child, 27 Jan 2021 - n/w

  • #21
I wish they’d call them Jane Doe 043. I keep thinking it’s someone who is 43 years old, or 48 in the case of the other one I had been looking at (who I was hoping had been identified)
 
  • #22
I wish they’d call them Jane Doe 043. I keep thinking it’s someone who is 43 years old, or 48 in the case of the other one I had been looking at (who I was hoping had been identified)
I know - when I saw this thread get bumped initially I thought it was the 48 Jane Doe who got ID'd.
 
  • #23
Anyone else thinking she could be a minor? Maybe that's why they won't publicly ID her? MOO
Absolutely. But, I also agree that she may have been used to net the biggest fish in the pond..
which has happened...imo
 
  • #24
I wish they’d call them Jane Doe 043. I keep thinking it’s someone who is 43 years old, or 48 in the case of the other one I had been looking at (who I was hoping had been identified)
I think you mean Jane Doe 46. She sounds older, in the audio that I listened to. imo
 

Guardians Monthly Goal

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
66
Guests online
1,747
Total visitors
1,813

Forum statistics

Threads
635,380
Messages
18,674,740
Members
243,189
Latest member
clamburglar
Back
Top