Identified! Jane Doe 43, WhtFem, 20-30, critical info re: exploitation of child, 27 Jan 2021 - n/w

  • #21
I wish they’d call them Jane Doe 043. I keep thinking it’s someone who is 43 years old, or 48 in the case of the other one I had been looking at (who I was hoping had been identified)
 
  • #22
I wish they’d call them Jane Doe 043. I keep thinking it’s someone who is 43 years old, or 48 in the case of the other one I had been looking at (who I was hoping had been identified)
I know - when I saw this thread get bumped initially I thought it was the 48 Jane Doe who got ID'd.
 
  • #23
Anyone else thinking she could be a minor? Maybe that's why they won't publicly ID her? MOO
Absolutely. But, I also agree that she may have been used to net the biggest fish in the pond..
which has happened...imo
 
  • #24
I wish they’d call them Jane Doe 043. I keep thinking it’s someone who is 43 years old, or 48 in the case of the other one I had been looking at (who I was hoping had been identified)
I think you mean Jane Doe 46. She sounds older, in the audio that I listened to. imo
 

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
75
Guests online
4,053
Total visitors
4,128

Forum statistics

Threads
633,293
Messages
18,639,081
Members
243,470
Latest member
JBrohman
Back
Top