I just don't understand all of the condemnation toward the whole of AWP, with demands that those who worked with J report what they knew and when. They have nothing to do with this case. MOO
MOO I think they have a lot to do with the case given the following:
1. Questions around the financial setup of the org (i.e. is there an AWP without JL? Is continuing to support AWP equivalent to lining his pockets for his defense?) some others have posted speculating on this and sourcing different documents
2. The use of the AWP email account for the emails with the victim (see the following article for the source of this info)
True Crime YouTuber to Plead Not Guilty to 1992 Child Rape Charges
However, you're describing adult(s) who may or may not have known what a minor did to another minor 30 years ago. That offended minor is now more than an adult with agency who can report what she chooses to report or not report what she chooses not to report.
Having been in a situation where my choice to report or not to report was ripped away from me, and knowing how it felt to have that power taken from me, too, I would NEVER report if it did not involve a person who is presently a minor. AMOO Sometimes people do more harm than good, and its worthwhile to ask the survivor what he or she wants. I certainly have no expectations of anyone not involved 30 years ago to report squat. In fact, it's my opinion that that power should forever remain with the survivor alone, and what that adult survivor chooses to do is their right, not mine.
<mosanip - off topic>
If I understand your point, it sounds like you are saying that people are in a tricky position in terms of whether to report their friend or acquaintance if they admit to sexually assaulting another individual, if they do not know the wishes of the victim. From my understanding, a lack of evidence might lead a victim to not want to come forward or will lead LE to not pursue the case when they do. If a third party corroborated my story, I and authorities might feel my case has a chance. If they do not come forward, I may never know they could corroborate. So I think bringing forth evidence you have that is coming from the perpetrator makes sense. The victim themselves still has the decision on whether they want to make a police report themselves, about their own experience, don’t they? Please correct me if I’m not understanding you correctly or this is factually off, IANAL MOO JMOO
Where I agree with you is that if a victim shares with you that they are the victim of a SA and they are currently an adult, then you should honor their wishes in terms of police involvement and also should not pressure them in any manner. MOO
Anyway… I think there are some important questions related to AWP that 1 &2 listed above brings up… Were others at the org were aware of this and chose not to come forward, and instead to continue to work for and associate with that individual despite knowing this? Were they able to read these emails? Did they? In terms of whether these questions are relevant to the case, idk, I’m new to websleuths so perhaps these questions are off-topic (is it a crime to know about a crime and not report it? I think no but if that’s accurate than perhaps we should restrict discussion to things that are crimes). That being said, I wonder if verbal admissions of guilt can be used as evidence in some manner, in which case it might be relevant whether JL has confessed to others at AWP? Or if someone at the org could in some way answer whether JL did indeed have access to this email address and whether it was plausible he did send the emails?