Jason Young to get new trial #2

[citygirl]

Agree, he was tired, in shock and knew he was under suspicion. He showed up for his NTO, I know, court order, but he showed!

But his SIL who found her brutally murdered sister was not in shock? But he was? Wrapped in the arms of his mother and family?

 

[citygirl]

It was LE's theory, I posted the link to the search warrant many times with the reasoning behind it. They thought due to the clean condition of the child that she had been removed from the home.

And the investigation was a dead end. Nothing came of it. Done deal.

 

[citygirl]

And what an innocent man would do, as having no engagement with LE outside of the presence of an attorney is the way to protect your innocence.

LE is deceptive (which they will readily admit) and more than willing to twist someone's words in order to get their desired outcome. Watch the video on why never to talk to the police.

He didn't have to utter a word. He only needed to hand the keys over. And he hid.

 

[JusticeFever]

What's wrong with it is that you said he had an appointment. It was in response to another poster pointing out that the trip to Brevard was out of his way. He had NO appointment close to home. None.

But, its not suspicious that he decided to make another call while he was in that part of the state. Now, what would have been suspicious is if his meeting with Jennifer Sproles at Dickinson Hospital was a cold call. and not pre-arranged weeks in advance!

 

[JusticeFever]

In what way? According to whom?

In his conversation with Heather about CY.

 

[JusticeFever]

And the investigation was a dead end. Nothing came of it. Done deal.

So, nothing came from the other theory then too, CY was never drugged either?
Or, do we just pick and choose the state's theories until we find one that fits?????????

 

[sunshine05]

And the investigation was a dead end. Nothing came of it. Done deal.

The significance is that investigators believed there was enough reason to explore possible ways that C. could have been taken from the home to be cleaned up. No wet towels, no bloody towels found, clean clothing on child after being in all that blood and no blood in the drains....it is a logical thought process and just because they didn't find blood in the Lexus does not mean she wasn't taken. I don't consider it a "done deal" just because they didn't find anything in the Lexus. The possibility still exists.

For those who surmise that the blood on her feet and hands completely "wore off" is not logical at all. That is even contrary to the State's theory that JY cleaned her up ---- "He was the only one who would do that..." When someone begins suggesting that maybe someone else cleaned her up --- MF --- now it's "Well, maybe the blood wore off from walking around." I highly doubt it.

 

[citygirl]

In his conversation with Heather about CY.

Who said it was taken out of context?

 

[JusticeFever]

Who said it was taken out of context?

Heather did, she testified to what they were talking about prior and how it led up to his statement. Its at WRAL with all the other testimony from both trials.

 

[citygirl]

But, its not suspicious that he decided to make another call while he was in that part of the state. Now, what would have been suspicious is if his meeting with Jennifer Sproles at Dickinson Hospital was a cold call. and not pre-arranged weeks in advance!

The meeting that he was late for? How do you know it was prearranged weeks in advance?

 

[oenophile]

He didn't have to utter a word. He only needed to hand the keys over. And he hid.

Via someone else. Like everything regarding JY, you are reading too much into it.

 

[oenophile]

The significance is that investigators believed there was enough reason to explore possible ways that C. could have been taken from the home to be cleaned up. No wet towels, no bloody towels found, clean clothing on child after being in all that blood and no blood in the drains....it is a logical thought process and just because they didn't find blood in the Lexus does not mean she wasn't taken. I don't consider it a "done deal" just because they didn't find anything in the Lexus. The possibility still exists.

For those who surmise that the blood on her feet and hands completely "wore off" is not logical at all. That is even contrary to the State's theory that JY cleaned her up ---- "He was the only one who would do that..." When someone begins suggesting that maybe someone else cleaned her up --- MF --- now it's "Well, maybe the blood wore off from walking around." I highly doubt it.

I think it is perfectly reasonable to believe that no one cleaned her up, and that the limited blood on her feet did indeed rub off.

I find it difficult to believe that either a) anyone took her from the residence; or b) anyone cleaned her up. If someone had indeed cleaned her up (AFTER allowing her to roam free and track blood in the bathroom), then they would have risked her saying something.

 

[citygirl]

Nothing about this case cracks me up. Not sure if he was excited , just that he wanted to start bringing some items from his parents house to his home in Raleigh. And, if you expect me to answer any more of your posts in the future, you can stop with the insults and discuss the case like adults.

This is a deadly serious case. This man murdered his pregnant wife in the presence of his 2 year old. That post cracked me up. The thought that he would be worried about what his wife thinks is laughable to me. Still is. MOO.

 

[citygirl]

So, nothing came from the other theory then too, CY was never drugged either?
Or, do we just pick and choose the state's theories until we find one that fits?????????

Ummmm. When did I include anything about CY being drugged? I have never weighed in on that?

 

[sunshine05]

I think it is perfectly reasonable to believe that no one cleaned her up, and that the limited blood on her feet did indeed rub off.

I find it difficult to believe that either a) anyone took her from the residence; or b) anyone cleaned her up. If someone had indeed cleaned her up (AFTER allowing her to roam free and track blood in the bathroom), then they would have risked her saying something.

I can't imagine that amount of blood on her feet and hands just disappearing on it's own. No bloody handprints anywhere in the house. No blood on pajamas even though her doll was placed right next to her mother. However, several areas of the PJ's were positive for presence of blood but none was visible. That strongly suggests that they were washed.

 

[citygirl]

The significance is that investigators believed there was enough reason to explore possible ways that C. could have been taken from the home to be cleaned up. No wet towels, no bloody towels found, clean clothing on child after being in all that blood and no blood in the drains....it is a logical thought process and just because they didn't find blood in the Lexus does not mean she wasn't taken. I don't consider it a "done deal" just because they didn't find anything in the Lexus. The possibility still exists.

For those who surmise that the blood on her feet and hands completely "wore off" is not logical at all. That is even contrary to the State's theory that JY cleaned her up ---- "He was the only one who would do that..." When someone begins suggesting that maybe someone else cleaned her up --- MF --- now it's "Well, maybe the blood wore off from walking around." I highly doubt it.

And the possibility still exists that her own father could have disposed of wet towels, bloody towels etc. More likely, IMO. I highly doubt that MY's only sister had anything to do with this. In fact, I know she didn't.

 

[JusticeFever]

I think it is perfectly reasonable to believe that no one cleaned her up, and that the limited blood on her feet did indeed rub off.

I find it difficult to believe that either a) anyone took her from the residence; or b) anyone cleaned her up. If someone had indeed cleaned her up (AFTER allowing her to roam free and track blood in the bathroom), then they would have risked her saying something.

Its the shoes in the bed that are throwing me, and the fact one of them tested positive for blood.
Thank you for being so polite and respectful, btw.

 

[citygirl]

Heather did, she testified to what they were talking about prior and how it led up to his statement. Its at WRAL with all the other testimony from both trials.

So we are to believe her testimony but not Gracie's? And Mrs. Young's also? How does one decide whose testimony is legit and whose isn't? What do we base that on?

 

[citygirl]

Via someone else. Like everything regarding JY, you are reading too much into it.

Reading too much into it? It is what it is. He didn't show his face. Not once after the murder. Not until he was under a court order. In fact, he hid behind sunglasses at the funeral. Couldn't look a single person in the eye.

 

[citygirl]

Oh, gee, I don't know. Maybe the lady he had the meeting with, Jennifer Sproles, she only testified to it under oath, the meeting was planned 2-3 weeks in advance from a Chart One rep. Did you watch the trial? And, do you mean the same road that Jason missed the turn and the investigators got lost on too!
I am not answering any more of your questions., you never look anything up and you never thank anyone when they give you the answers. Everything is at WRAL, you can find it just like we do.

I don't believe his boss had any inkling about that meeting?