Jason Young to get new trial #3

[Landonsmom02]

Tis true. I forget the witness's name and don't have time to look it up right now, but she was from NY. I was in the courtroom the day she testified. There were emails she read as I recall. JY was not the happy camper that MY (not yet married to JY) got pregnant. And he did want an abortion.

Plus didn't PY testify that Jy didn't want to get married she told him it was the right thing to do??? Maybe I'm mistaken

 

[Landonsmom02]

MY's purse. Was there cash in her purse?

I don't know? But if you find that out please let me know.

 

[sunshine05]

BBM. I think they became suspicious when he wouldn't speak to them once he knew she was dead. He found out @ 1 o'clock. It was a good 8 hours before he arrived @ his SIL's. He hadn't retained a lawyer yet. Why wouldn't he speak with them? Wouldn't an innocent husband want to talk to the cops immediately? Not get the info from other sources? Go straight to the people on the scene? Ask about the details? How could this be? I left a healthy wife and child just last evening! Getting his mother to take the call for him was a mistake. It didn't look good. All just my opinion.

He couldn't have found out @1:00 as the 911 call was at 1:30.

He had spoken to a lawyer by phone and he had a heads up from friends that police were very suspicious of him. Innocent people need to be especially careful because nothing was planned and because things in their life could potentially look suspicious. (Consider MM affair)

A killer will have planned everything out for the premeditated crime so could actually appear to look less suspicious.

I have to say that there was a time in my life where I said and thought the same thing --- What's there to hide? Talk to police. They're good, they just want to help find the killer. Now I know differently after watching the Cooper trial just how badly things can go and I would never talk to them and would advise all of my friends not to either. I would answer written questions from them, maybe but that is it.

Many, many people have been exonerated from faulty police investigations when many years later new evidence comes to light. It happens and you can't be too careful. They don't always have your best interest at heart when trying to solve a crime. They do get tunnel vision especially with a spouse.

However, even though JY opted not to talk to police, ironically he was convicted for that very reason. The jurors heard that he refused to talk, refused to respond to the civil claims and that was really the main difference btwn trial 1 and 2 and we know how the jury voted in trial 1. So, remaining silent actually was used against him. Yes, it was overturned because of that, but the prejudice of a conviction is difficult to overcome by anyone. He will have to face a 3rd trial with the jury knowing that he was already convicted of the crime. That can never be undone. What was done to him was extremely harmful and in my opinion the State should drop the charges and let him go. If they had solid evidence they never would have resorted to unlawful tactics to win. They were desperate and crossed their fingers that it wouldn't come back on appeal and they lost but the can is kicked down the road now for a new DA to deal with.

 

[Landonsmom02]

The child was two years old. That would be at the stage that is well known as "terrible twos". That phrase comes from the fact that two year olds are always pushing their boundaries. They can be told to not walk into the road, but that is never enough.

IMO, 3's are worse lol. But again CY was a well behaved child it seems. I don't see the big deal about her purse being on the floor?

 

[Boodles]

Go back and read the genesis of that post. My point is as a father he had no desire to even see what his little girl had been exposed to. She was in the house for hours with her mother's dead body. Wouldn't you want to have a sense of that?

One of JY's BFF's testified that they (friends) went through every part of the house once it was released by LE. Because they wanted to see every part of the crime scene.

 

[Landonsmom02]

They were pissed at him because he did not do their bidding and they decided they were going to take him down whether he did it or not.

This is your opinion, please state that. Thanks

 

[SStarr33]

I don't know? But if you find that out please let me know.

I sure will. I would also like to know if her wallet was fingerprinted. I hate not knowing these kind of details.

 

[Landonsmom02]

I don't know the answer or if it came in at trial.
Maybe MF had a new cell phone or number, maybe Jason did, maybe they talked on the Young home phone, maybe MF was over there a lot .All we know is that he wrote down her phone number on his directions to his meeting, and that he called her on Nov. 2nd....the night he left and then of course the next day.
Why didn't he program her number into his cell after he called her from Cracker Barrel, I don't know.
It certainly would not look suspicious if he had his sister-in laws phone number, but, it looks less suspicious
that he didn't have it programmed in, imo, if she was to be part of the critical plan to find MY and rescue CY.

This sure is full of alot of maybe's

 

[citygirl]

Sorry, crime scene photos prove you are again wrong:

http://www.wral.com/specialreports/michelleyoung/image_gallery/9727548/

Thank you! #18 shows a clear view from the door to the edge of the counter. But even better? #27 clearly shows a kitchen door! That's where the bloody print was on the doorknob! The perp was in the kitchen. He saw the purse. And he didn't touch it. Interesting.

 

[JusticeFever]

This sure is full of alot of maybe's

I find the whole case to be that way........

 

[SStarr33]

One of JY's BFF's testified that they (friends) went through every part of the house once it was released by LE. Because they wanted to see every part of the crime scene.

I wonder if the tooth, bloody sheets and socks that LE left behind were still there.

 

[SStarr33]

This is your opinion, please state that. Thanks

My signature says JMO. Can you not see it? I can't either, but I thought it was my device or that I have flash blocked.

 

[Landonsmom02]

CY was only 2.5 and I also don't think MY would leave her purse on the floor, no matter how clean the floor was....Purses, pocketbooks don't go on a floor, especially if there is no carpet..not when there was a shelf or counter or even a chair or stool right there. It almost looks like the purse was put there in plain view, like look "no robbery"......

Have you seen the other photos from the crime scene where things have been re-arranged.......clothes in the laundry basket, remote controls, things in and near MY's closet upstairs on the floor and on the doorknob.....there are photos of things being moved, who did that?

And, if they did that, then MY's purse could have been moved as well!!!!!

Again people do things different. And yes I have seen thsoe pictures cause you have mentioned it 100 times. See police take pictures of crime scenes before and after things are moved. They do move things to inspect them.

 

[sunshine05]

I sure will. I would also like to know if her wallet was fingerprinted. I hate not knowing these kind of details.

No, it was not.

 

[SStarr33]

Thank you! #18 shows a clear view from the door to the edge of the counter. But even better? #27 clearly shows a kitchen door! That's where the bloody print was on the doorknob! The perp was in the kitchen. He saw the purse. And he didn't touch it. Interesting.

I thought it was the door to the garage that had the blood.

 

[otto]

IMO, 3's are worse lol. But again CY was a well behaved child it seems. I don't see the big deal about her purse being on the floor?

It's not that a 2 year old child is a poorly behaved child at the time of challenging boundaries. Two year old children normally push the boundaries because they are learning. It is normal for a 2 year old to do the opposite of what that child is told. That said, Jason's daughter understood that biting resulted in a spanking, so clearly she had some experience with misbehaving.

 

[SStarr33]

No, it was not.

Unreal. So, the perp could have gone into her wallet and no one knows it.

What a complete joke.

 

[sunshine05]

I thought it was the door to the garage that had the blood.

From the kitchen to the garage, yes.

 

[sunshine05]

All of the discussion about the purse won't get us anywhere but I agree there is something odd about it being on the floor. With a desk right there and this is a big house, there would be no reason to set a purse on the floor.

MF mentioned the purse in the 911 call so she clearly wanted to draw attention to it it seems.

 

[otto]

One of JY's BFF's testified that they (friends) went through every part of the house once it was released by LE. Because they wanted to see every part of the crime scene.

Does this BFF have a name? Why would Jason permit people to tour the crime scene? That sounds very odd.

Jason's sister and a friend of the family cleaned out the house, but I don't recall any people "visiting" the house due to curiosity about the bloody murder scene. At the time that Jason's sister and a family friend cleaned the house, they found Michelle's tooth.