Sweetiemom
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Dec 13, 2012
- Messages
- 1,790
- Reaction score
- 15,915
I love how she is smiling at the jury explaining how she went to visit Travis in the middle of the night.\
There should be a time limit on testimony, I mean 3 days seems quite reasonable. Enough is enough.
I just tuned in and thought for a minute she was talking about the murder day :what:
I love how she is smiling at the jury explaining how she went to visit Travis in the middle of the night.\
The interesting thing to me is she is not lying ENOUGH - yet. I can see why another poster said her husband was sympathetic. She looks like she was gullible (as she is currently posing) but she does not look abused. This is very interesting to me. I mean, if you are going to lie, why not lie all the way? Through dad under the bus more, through Travis under more (with actual abuse).
It seems to me that perhaps she does feel she is describing actual abuse - as a narcissist would. Being ignored, not being cherished - all fatal wounds to a narcissist - worse than abuse. Perhaps for her, this story is more than enough to justify the end.
Just thinking out loud. Of course, she could add more abuse on the actual day of the murder, but, so far, all the testimony has shown that TA stopped when any girl (including her) said to stop. He never hit anyone. At most, if we assume some truth, he used her. No abuse, no ongoing abusive relationship. She willingly gave to many others and he was next in line. He was no worse than Darryl who was 20 years older and did the same things with her. It's just that Darryl didn't try to leave first. As I am seeing it, that is the abuse she is alleging. He didn't cherish her.
Interesting from a psychological standpoint (at least to me).
The Love Sacks?