I've mentioned it before, but am more struck by the thought after yesterday's text in which Travis ribs the defendant for not meeting a PPL quota of whatever kind.
The defendant went to PPL on her own initially, but IMO Travis is the only reason she remained with the company. A lot is made of the fact she converted to Mormonism to hold onto Travis, but I think it's equally relevant that she inserted herself into the other key part of Travis' s life- his work- and would not let go.
She reports zero income from PPL in 2007 or 2008, yet expects Travis to take her to PPL meetings and conferences across the country. Being seen as a success in the business is important to Travis, and he judges others in the business on the same basis, yet she expects him to drag along on his arm a non-producer who in 2-3 years hasn't even achieved the lowest goal in the business?