That has not been proven.
IMO, there is no doubt....
That has not been proven.
Right, she lies all the time to try and not be held responsible.... So what is more believable: a liar's word about a gun in a closet or the damning circumstantial evidence that she brought the gun with her to TAs?
It was already loaded.
That has not been proven.
I was re-watching her police interview yesterday and when asked if Travis had a gun, she clearly stated "Not that I am aware of". Doh!
That has not been proven.
She cleaned his house didn't she?
Chris Hughes has, to my knowledge been silent on the topic of Travis and guns. I admit I have not visited said social media today. Are you perhaps confusing Chris Hughes with Dave Hall? Dave is the person who has been on other media with the video of Travis shooting Dave's guns. Dave was not asked to appear in court prior to today (as a witness) and as far as anything I have seen or read he has a constitutional right to speak to whomever he wants to about whatever he wants to. No one could have imagined that she would dream up this cockamamie story that the gun belonged to Travis. So, I guess they did not think they needed testimony to show Travis did not own a gun. I still say the defense walked right into this door, and it will ultimately go to show even more what a liar she is.
Anyone notice how Jodi leans over when there is a sidebar?
AND - she said if he did have one, *she'd* know about it...
That has not been proven.
Great post! Just wanted to add my :twocents: If the pistol belonged to Travis, and he was shot with it, why didn't she just leave his gun at the crime scene. Why take it and dispose of it in the desert? Because it was her grandfather's pistol, she stole in order to murder Travis, that's why.