jodi arias TAKES THE STAND FOR 14TH DAY #69*may contain graphic and adult content*

Status
Not open for further replies.
  • #1,001
IMO the "rape" implications are a set up for the expert defense witnesses. Something to the effect of *Jodi was so controlled/abused she even put up with Rape because it was "attention" from Travis*

"Attention" was a huge buzzword for the defense yesterday. Nurmi got her to say it every time he had a chance.

I noticed that, too. On cross, she said 'I liked the sex', yesterday it was all about 'well, I liked the attention from him". It's entirely possible she liked both the sex, and the attention.
In my opinion, it's not possible for her to be truthful about almost anything.
 
  • #1,002
Do you all find it odd that JA keeps cutting her right hand? She cut it at work when she grabbed a glass. She cut it at Travis's on a glass (NOT) and yet she keeps saying she is left handed ?? I know she said she is ambidextrous, but it sounds to me that she is right handed. If she is reaching under the bar to grab a glass and straighten them, wouldn't be you be using your most dominant hand?

I just keep wondering how long she lasted at these restaurant jobs if she's that klutzy.
 
  • #1,003
I am not an expert so I really do not know what they can prove. I would imagine that a persons handwriting changes and it would be evident if it doesn't match to the time period. jmo

i don't think anyone could do more than venture an opinion about that. again, it proves nothing. so she wrote it. big deal. to me the relevant part is WHEN did she write those pages and as far as i know, there's no way to prove that. she could have created these pages when she and nurmi cooked up her bogus self-defense claim, for all anyone knows.

i mean, what's next? this girl who supposedly was asked about a three-way? people lie on the stand all the time, for a price. it's happened in some high profile cases in texas. the cullen davis trial for one.
 
  • #1,004
Thank you for re posting this for me.....if we add Yreaka in there at the end, and two trips from Salinas to Monterey (because remember she went to Salinas then back to DB's then back to Salinas to catch the freeway so she says) I come up with 2,660.....still some mileage to account for tho.....
Not sure why we would add Yreka at the end - she returned the rental car in Redding. I do wonder how she got back to Yreka though ...
 
  • #1,005
I sure hope today we can get away from the sex trial and back to the First degree premeditated cold blooded murder trial!
 
  • #1,006
I know, right? Her having anal sex with a number of guys only proves that she wasn't some innocent prude. She was experienced in the sexual realm.
How unfortunate that the prosecution has to even bring up the sex topic just to refute the claim that JA was a sex slave of sorts. The defense has no defense for the brutal murder of Travis so they turn to these most irrelevant of issues to discuss during this trial. Hope the jury is as disgusted as we are.

Just jumping off of your post...

I've been thinking about something. Do you all think she actually enjoyed this sex or was she just using it to hold onto Travis because she knew that was the only way to keep his attention focused on her (holy run-on sentence)? I know there are a lot of women who don't enjoy sex all that much, they just go through the motions because they feel like its what they're supposed to do.

Did she start the sexual exploits because she craved it from him or did she do it because that's what she knew men wanted and she knew she could snare a man that way?
 
  • #1,007
If they had anal sex or they didn't have anal sex (obviously they did), what on this earth does that have to do with the fact that she murdered Travis????? I just don't get it.

Nothing it has nothing to do with it. I was just responding to a post someone made. Sorry if it bothers you.
 
  • #1,008
I am not a lawyer but ...

This DT strategy is not working, IMO! Before the DT began their CIC, I would have been contented if JA received LWOP despite firmly believing that JA had well earned the DP. Now, nothing short of the DP seems appropriate or acceptable.

Why didn't the DT go with a strategy of throwing JA on the mercy of the court and jurors - admitting full responsibility (pre-meditation and all) - in the hope that a juror or two would have sympathy and believe that she was repentant?

I understand that JA/DT are gambling on convincing just one juror and striving for something/anything less than LWOP. But, all I think they're managing to do is secure the DP. JMVHO

ETA: Even no defense would have been better than this defense. IMO

I agree with you and I wouldn't be surprised if Nurmi has had that conversation with Jodi, especially after her disastrous performance on cross.
 
  • #1,009
Not sure why we would add Yreka at the end - she returned the rental car in Redding. I do wonder how she got back to Yreka though ...
she went to Yreka first because she was running late for work and returned the car the next day....didn't she? or am I dreaming again....I do do that....LOL
 
  • #1,010
I'm looking forward to JM's grilling of the two defense witnesses. It will be just as good if not better than the way he dealt with JA on the stand. What a treat!
 
  • #1,011
ok dudes, so between the dogs barking non stop at the furnace repair guy while I toggled desperately between HLN and live stream with a migraine from hell...while jodi and that nurmi man droned on and on about how and when her anus was penetrated....

I had this feeling of normallacy...like jodi had readjusted her mask ...notice how comfortable she is.. she never corrects or disputes...she has slightly modulated her voice...notice how different she is from her msnbc video, where she is almost fully smiling as she LIES LIKE A DANG RUG.

she is a very dangerous sociopath, putting everyone in a semi-coma with that monotone, breathy pantanameter (sic). like warren jeffs...

note to HLN....women have brains...they are your demographic...please return to salacious news programming that we like to watch and get all these goody two shoes marginal, patronizing people off the air...it's just horrible...even remedial...

please fix et vous!
 
  • #1,012
She had to show some type of injury to convince the jury she's not lying about the abuse. Her finger looks like the pictures you see when you look up cut tendon. Matches exactly. I don't think a broken finger would ever look like that, ever. There are different bones in the finger so it's unlike they all would have been broken. But the injury appears to be between the finger and the hand and that is why it is crooked. jmo

I still maintain that her finger shows signs of a cutting injury. She says he broke it by kicking her. No cutting. Never mentions how it bled all over the place. I don't think it is possible she got that injury the way she said.
 
  • #1,013
I am not an expert so I really do not know what they can prove. I would imagine that a persons handwriting changes and it would be evident if it doesn't match to the time period. jmo

Jodi claims that she is ambidextrous, so she probably has different handwriting styles depending on which hand she's using at the time of the journal entries. Of course, this is subject to whether or not Jodi is being truthful about being ambidextrous, but that's a whole 'nother topic. :moo:
 
  • #1,014
If there's anything the jurors can all agree on, it's that Jodi craves attention. Unfortunately for her, they now realize they're the latest in a long line of victims she's willingly sacrificed to feed her insatiable need. Jodi's a vampire, and she and Nurmi are sucking them dry. Epic fail of a trial strategy imo.
 
  • #1,015
IMO the "rape" implications are a set up for the expert defense witnesses. Something to the effect of *Jodi was so controlled/abused she even put up with Rape because it was "attention" from Travis*

"Attention" was a huge buzzword for the defense yesterday. Nurmi got her to say it every time he had a chance.

i hope the jury is paying attention. because this whole 'i loved the attention' defense sure doesn't fit with her story that she was not 'in love' with him, was fine with him seeing other women, and didn't see this as a relationship with a future.

if any of that were true, she would have moved on. if any of that were true, she wouldn't have driven 1000 miles out of her way to see him, rather than going to see the guy who maybe COULD have been her 'mr. right.'
 
  • #1,016
Nothing it has nothing to do with it. I was just responding to a post someone made. Sorry if it bothers you.

What would bother me about you agreeing with me? ;)

ETA: I wasn't really commenting to your post, just jumping off. :)
 
  • #1,017
What would bother me about you agreeing with me? ;)

you seemed bothered that i said anything about anal sex you asked what does it have to do with anything.
 
  • #1,018
i hope the jury is paying attention. because this whole 'i loved the attention' defense sure doesn't fit with her story that she was not 'in love' with him, was fine with him seeing other women, and didn't see this as a relationship with a future.

if any of that were true, she would have moved on. if any of that were true, she wouldn't have driven 1000 miles out of her way to see him, rather than going to see the guy who maybe COULD have been her 'mr. right.'

Driving 1000 miles TO her abuser is a HUGE problem for the defense, IMO. It just throws the whole 'abused woman' line out the window. That is one of the main points that disproves that claim.
 
  • #1,019
Just jumping off of your post...

I've been thinking about something. Do you all think she actually enjoyed this sex or was she just using it to hold onto Travis because she knew that was the only way to keep his attention focused on her (holy run-on sentence)? I know there are a lot of women who don't enjoy sex all that much, they just go through the motions because they feel like its what they're supposed to do.

Did she start the sexual exploits because she craved it from him or did she do it because that's what she knew men wanted and she knew she could snare a man that way?

I had wondered about that too, I didn't have an opinion about it until I heard the phone sex tape (the original, unedited version), that orgasm was fake fake fake. Playing sex kitten was definitely a strategy.
 
  • #1,020
you seemed bothered that i said anything about anal sex you asked what does it have to do with anything.

Oh no, not at all! I'm sorry it came off that way. I just meant it in regards to the DT harping on it. :)
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
68
Guests online
2,111
Total visitors
2,179

Forum statistics

Threads
632,803
Messages
18,631,885
Members
243,297
Latest member
InternalExile
Back
Top