Jodi Arias trial discussion #21 *may contain graphic and adult content*

Status
Not open for further replies.
  • #421
WTF? Way too much useless info! MD5 stuff? Useless for the jury. He LOVES to hear himself talk about the minutiae. "And then I went to lunch and had a blt sandwich".
Jury? What jury? I thought I was watching the latest episode of 'Computer Forensics for Complete Morons Who Have Never Even Seen A Computer'? :waitasec:
 
  • #422
Dworkin examined Cannon dslr, had no internal memory, had one memory card, compact flash 4gb. He pulled photos off camera.

Defense to Dworkin: were you aware that these photos came from<inaudible>?
Objection JM, Approach

Camera came from Mesa PD
 
  • #423
:desert:
 
  • #424
February 4 Morning testimony

Exhibits #393 & 394 (photos). The objection by Martinez to the photos is sustained.

Lonnie Dworkin is on the stand. Wilmott is refreshing his memory about where the photos came from.
--photos were taken from a hard drive.
--hard drive belonged to Jodi Arias.
--Two photos were copied from the mirror image.
--Heliophone was looked at by Dworkin, the phone is a predeceasor of today's smart phones. The phone has some multimedia features such as take photos and record audio.
--Dworkin received the phone (Exhibit #424) on June 30, 2010.
--Once received Dworkin processed the phone to extract information. He generated several reports that each had a different perspective and scope.
--Dworkin had some "challenges" pulling information off the phone.
--Used to have to use screen captures or commercial software to extract information. With this particular type of phone there is no forensic software available to extract information. Dworkin captured the audio by playing it and capturing it. The text messages...he had to take photos of them.
--Phone belonged to Jodi Arias.
--As soon as the phone was powered on there was a photo of Jodi and another young lady.
--re: audio on phone. Dworkin obtained a copy of the user manual to make sure he wouldn't change anything on the phone. He noted that the phone has the ability to record audio.
--Dworkin was able to listen to 7-8 recordings. The phone had a small headphone jack on the side of the phone. He played the audio over the wire plugged into the jack and recorded it on his computer. The phone was directly connected to Dworkin's computer.
--Dworkin did screen captures to capture call logs and messages.
--Information was displayed on the phone and Dworkin took photos of each screen and this is what he did with this phone.
--Dworkin also looked at a Canon camera. Dworkin can't find his notes stating when he did this. Wilmott goes back to asking about the screen captures.
--Dworkin is asked about the photographs taken of the info. on the phone. They are photos of messages on the phone.
--Dworkin looked at his calender of his activities. He received the camera from the defence team. When doing so he did not have any paperwork/chain of custody forms at the time so he is checking his iPhone for the date of when he took custody of the camera. Dworkin checked it into his evidence locker on January 15, 2013.
--Dworkin has a standard protocal when checking cameras. He obtains the user manual and then looks at the memory and the ability to take remote photos, what kind of memory cards and how many, inspect the contents of the camera case. Takes photos of the camera and the memory cards. He notes information displayed on the screen when it is turned on.
--Often times the battery is dead and if the camera doesn't have internal memory. In this case this Canon DSLR does not have internal memory. The battery was dead. He checked the memory card, 4 gigabyte compact flash card. He forensically copied it.
--Dworkin preserved the forensic copy. Dworkin ensures that the forensic copy and the original are compared bit for bit to make sure they are the same.
--Dworkin was asked to look for images on the camera in allocated and unallocated space. Unallocated space photos are for the purpose of this discussion deleted photos.
--Wilmott asks Dworkin about when he picked up the camera it had been seized by Mesa PD, Martinez objects due to hearsay and Wilmott says not for an expert. Counsel approach the bench.

--Dworkin received the camera from Mesa, PD and it was in a shopping bag that has special markings on it. It is a paper evidence bag. Exhibit #364.
 
  • #425
I get the distinct impression that this dude is really self impressed and likes to hear the sound of his own voice.

Mmm, I think, because of his line of work, he has done a lot of testifying and has probably even taken courses in how to be a good witness. Notice how he always addresses the jury upon response. He always explains terms and acronyms. I think he knows his stuff (but not his calendar).
 
  • #426
Since he just got this camera Jan 15 of this year, does that mean no one examined this camera prior to this date? Did the pros/LE not examine this camera and its content?

I am sure the state did examine it.

Its been right there in the evidence room for 4 years.

imo
 
  • #427
Does this guy know what he's doing? First he didn't have what he needed to testify and now the defense is offering to help him out with his evidence? Wow...
 
  • #428
Uh, the other right.
 
  • #429
That's an evidence bag, not a shopping bag.
 
  • #430
I remember the crime involving the identical twin men. The DNA didn't prove which one did the crime. Oh there's Jodi's mom and twin sister in the front row. Looking identical.
 
  • #431
Dworkin is currently explaining evidence brown bag that had contents of the camera he examined
 
  • #432
  • #433
I'm kind of lost... what about the penis photos? Did Mr. Dworkin establish that those came from Jodi's drive? What's the purpose of "sneaking" a peek of those photos in? What was the purpose of those photos at all? :confused:

In the big of scheme of things, I don't think the jury will care what kind of photos TA or JA had on their computers. :confused:
 
  • #434
OMG! He knows how to open a bag?

:what:
 
  • #435
This is such a seriou matter. This Attorney lady is way way too giddy
 
  • #436
  • #437
was he trying to intimate that LE screwed up the chain of custody of the camera?
 
  • #438
For crying out loud! Get to the point already!
 
  • #439
chairgames20_zps1ce7f54c.jpg

Isn't this just a different style chair w/o arms and high back? If Jodi's chair was significantly lower the table would come up to her chest. She appears to be sitting at proper height for reading/writing.
 
  • #440
was he trying to intimate that LE screwed up the chain of custody of the camera?

sounds like it

Sent from my SGH-T989 using Tapatalk 2
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Staff online

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
156
Guests online
1,243
Total visitors
1,399

Forum statistics

Threads
632,400
Messages
18,625,917
Members
243,135
Latest member
AgentMom
Back
Top