Oh I believe Travis did have the T-shirt made. The front says 'Travis Alexander's' and the back from what I've heard says 'Be Better Blog'.
If it's the same one it was just advertising for his blog imo.
Actually, I am sure I heard her tell the man testifying to be sure and hold them down. Was I hearing things? jmo
(ohhhhhhh drone on and drone on about the picture already........)
If she painted this in 2008 and was claiming at the time that someone murdered him and she left the scene while he was alive how could she know what the crime scene photos looked like unless she was there herself. It appears to be the crime scene photo of Travis as he was found in the shower. Only other person who would have seen that in 2008 would have been JA. If it is from 2008 wouldn't this have been important evidence for the police??? If it were drawn by Jodi before her arrest did her family conceal it from the police? I would think if anything they would have destroyed it. Only a sick mind would hold onto something like that.
I'm really surprised eBay has such low standards. Seems that reproducing crime scene photos in any way, shape or form, should be prohibited by law. Those photos belong to the police department and I'm sure they did not give permission for this photo to be reproduced and certainly not for retail purposes. Now if it were painted by Jodi from memory there is little anyone can do about it except complain to eBay. jmo
Yes, you did. Juan needs to ask about the Walmart receipts on her trip down with the haircolor purchases Clairol Nice & Easy/Natural Instincts...Did I heard the DA say pictures prove her hair was brown in May?
... waiting for Juan to show the BACK of the shirt and panties which, if memory serves correctly, should have the name of TA's blog, putting in context that neither of these items were ever intended to claim the person wearing them belonged to TA.
... waiting for Juan to show the BACK of the shirt and panties which, if memory serves correctly, should have the name of TA's blog, putting in context that neither of these items were ever intended to claim the person wearing them belonged to TA.
She admits she was there that day/night and killed him. So why is she concentrating on the hair dye thing when the rental agent already testified she had blond then?
Oh well, let her. IMHO, it will only reiterate to the jury how much thought and premeditation she had in this. bleaching her hair, along with renting a car and the license plate thing, then dying her hair back. Oh, and the killing was so traumatic, she went directly to another guy's to spend time with him.
Yep!
JMHO
fran