Josh Duggar charged with Receipt/Possession Child Sexual Abuse Material, 29 April 2021 *guilty* #3

[Hippiemomof5]

Not sure if I'm answering your question, but people are allowed to video call inmates; it's considered remote visiting. This is why Anna is video logged as having called Josh so many times. She is not allowed, however, to make phone calls to him; he has to call her.

it has me confused as well.

 

[Luna20]

Not sure if I'm answering your question, but people are allowed to video call inmates; it's considered remote visiting. This is why Anna is video logged as having called Josh so many times. She is not allowed, however, to make phone calls to him; he has to call her.

Thanks. Maybe that’s what she meant.

 

[Cool Cats]

@Cool Cats in your #730 post in paragraph #4 it says Anna made 2 calls to him on Christmas day totaling 27 minutes. The paragraph following also said she called him. That’s where my question originated from. Am I confusing it?

I still think he was calling her, never heard of anyone calling inmates in jail, State prison or Federal prison.

Josh sits in solitary, no way to take calls.

But like @mickey2942 says it could be special calls for the holidays.

Just my opinion.

 

[mickey2942]

I was thinking regular phone calls but video calls are the big thing now so apparently she can call him.

Perhaps, it was a special event, for the holidays. I believe that jails and prisons have made more access for video chat, since in person visits have been suspended indefinitely in many prisons and jails due to Covid-19.

 

[Cool Cats]

Perhaps, it was a special event, for the holidays. I believe that jails and prisons have made more access for video chat, since in person visits have been suspended indefinitely in many prisons and jails due to Covid-19.

I changed my post, I don't think she normally calls him but I think you could be right that it was special for the holidays only.

 

[mickey2942]

I changed my post, I don't think she normally calls him but I think you could be right that it was special for the holidays only.

Generally, holidays are depressing and lonely in jail or prison. I wouldn't be surprised if Josh has already had a psych evaluation for sentencing, probably from two different psychologists, one for the defense, one for the prosecution.

It wouldn't be surprising if Josh Duggar was depressed. Maybe he has been allowed more calls, or video chat based on recommendations from his team.

 

[tayaway]

I still think he was calling her, never heard of anyone calling inmates in jail, State prison or Federal prison.

No. I posted (#736) a link from the jail Josh is currently being held in - Anna video calls him. It's considered remote visitation.

Perhaps, it was a special event, for the holidays. I believe that jails and prisons have made more access for video chat, since in person visits have been suspended indefinitely in many prisons and jails due to Covid-19.

Yes, video calling is the norm now, for most local, state, and federal institutions. I provided a link about it (#736).

I changed my post, I don't think she normally calls him but I think you could be right that it was special for the holidays only.

No. Anna regularly video calls him. Please see the above links. His jail also notes that people can visit through 2 methods, one being in person, and the other through video calling inmates. It is not a holiday thing, it is the norm now.

 

[Cool Cats]

No. I posted (#736) a link from the jail Josh is currently being held in - Anna video calls him. It's considered remote visitation.



Yes, video calling is the norm now, for most local, state, and federal institutions. I provided a link about it (#736).



No. Anna regularly video calls him. Please see the above links. His jail also notes that people can visit through 2 methods, one being in person, and the other through video calling inmates. It is not a holiday thing, it is the norm now.

Ok thanks. Things are really different now. I wonder how it will be for him in Federal prison.

 

[Cool Cats]

Josh Duggar asked a judge for a new trial in a motion that tried to blame a former employee for the child sexual abuse material found on his computer

Duggar's attorneys filed a motion Wednesday evening asking the court to acquit Duggar of downloading and possessing child , and complaining that their client was unfairly prevented from calling a "necessary witness" during the seven-day trial.

That witness was a person who had worked at Duggar's used car lot in Springdale, Arkansas. Duggar's attorneys said in their motion that the former employee — who was also a registered sex offender — had "regularly used the desktop computer in the months and weeks leading up to May 2019."

Duggar's attorneys said that former employee, who had previously been interviewed by federal authorities and prosecutors, sent an "unsolicited email" to a prosecutor shortly before the trial. The email stated that the former employee had been "completely mistaken" when he told investigators he had not been at Duggar's used car lot, according to the motion.

The former employee said in his email that he had been in Arkansas between May 8 and May 11, 2019, days before Duggar's child downloading activity, and that he did not recall whether he used Duggar's computer during his trip. The former employee also sent a number of text messages, travel information, and receipts showing his various travels that month, according to the motion.

While Duggar's attorneys acknowledged that the former employee hoped his email would "establish that he was not at the car lot on certain dates in question," they accused prosecutors of improperly concealing the email until three days before Duggar's trial started.

They alleged that the former employee sent another follow-up email after the trial started, which included the social media passwords of several other Duggar siblings. Duggar's team said this information would have helped them show the jury that multiple people had password access to various Duggar-related accounts.

"In this case, Duggar was deprived of materially exculpatory evidence until the evening before the Government rested its case," his attorneys wrote.

 

[mickey2942]

Isn't it incumbent on the defense to establish this information? They knew of the employee in question, and his hours of work. I don't see anything that the prosecution withheld from the defense.

This is what I thought his defense should have been all along, and I was surprised that they didn't bring this up previously...seems a bit late to me.

 

[Shamrock1]

I’ll try to read the motion in a bit, but this doesn’t change the fact that Josh’s phone was present.

Also, would it be obvious that the desktop is partitioned? Is there an icon for “dark web” or whatever on the home screen?

 

[kaen]

Isn't it incumbent on the defense to establish this information? They knew of the employee in question, and his hours of work. I don't see anything that the prosecution withheld from the defense.

This is what I thought his defense should have been all along, and I was surprised that they didn't bring this up previously...seems a bit late to me.

Eventually, he will appeal his conviction on ineffectiveness of counsel. His attorney should have been putting alternate theories out there but didn't really do much of anything.

ETA: I believe he is guilty and this conviction should not be overturned. He has a right to try but I doubt he will have any success.
Additionally, I don't think I could look at him if he were my spouse. Why she continues to deal with him is beyond me!

 

[meanmaryjean]

Josh Duggar defense team files motion for acquittal or new trial

This version suggests the investigators were 'star struck'.

Imagine being star struck by Josh Duggar. Ew

 

[mickey2942]

Eventually, he will appeal his conviction on ineffectiveness of counsel. His attorney should have been putting alternate theories out there but didn't really do much of anything.

ETA: I believe he is guilty and this conviction should not be overturned. He has a right to try but I doubt he will have any success.
Additionally, I don't think I could look at him if he were my spouse. Why she continues to deal with him is beyond me!

I agree. I think that the defense was aggressive in the beginning, and then seemed to just shrug, and go through the motions. Wonder what dynamics occurred?

 

[Longtime_lurker2019]

My BIL is in jail. We send him $$ and there is an app we can call him on. We can video chat or phone chat or just email. But we can set a time and call him.

 

[Shamrock1]

Eventually, he will appeal his conviction on ineffectiveness of counsel. His attorney should have been putting alternate theories out there but didn't really do much of anything.

ETA: I believe he is guilty and this conviction should not be overturned. He has a right to try but I doubt he will have any success.
Additionally, I don't think I could look at him if he were my spouse. Why she continues to deal with him is beyond me!

Ineffective how?

 

[Scrapper18]

I hear what everyone is saying and agree his legal team should have investigated and brought up this witness at trial. What I don’t know is discovery rules. Was the state required to turn over the communication from this employee to JD’s legal team? If so, what is the legal timeline? For the record, yes, I think he is guilty. Curious if the government made an error here.

 

[kaen]

Ineffective how?

They didn't present the case of the other employee who may have downloaded the material. No doubt in my mind that the guy is a pedophile who downloaded this material. But, ineffectiveness of counsel is often a reason for appeal even though it is usually not successful.

 

[Hippiemomof5]

Is the other employee the same one who was in jail during the times the explicit video and photos were downloaded?

 

[nyvictoria]

I agree. I think that the defense was aggressive in the beginning, and then seemed to just shrug, and go through the motions. Wonder what dynamics occurred?

In the face of unimpeachable evidence, Josh wouldn’t take a plea?

How did this sex offender ex-employee come to be employed by Josh? Did they meet on some CSAM site? Did they ever share materials?