<mod snip>
I am not really wanting to argue I just think there's a reason they did not say forensic evidence, also they don't have a time of death. I think I know why they don't one of the rumors would make sense to why they can't get a time of death, to say they have they suspects finger prints or dna, blood to me is giving the community false hopes, I feel this person knew what he was doing right down to making sure they couldn't get a time of death, I think he knew what he was doing to try and cover all his bases, and that is a scary thought. Sorry for being so argumentative,
We all want to see whoever did this get what's coming to her/him.
You know more than we do. That can be good and bad. Most of us
are dealing with what we've read and it"s not a whole lot. You're dealing with what you're hearing and what you've read.
I find it very hard to believe hoever, that someone can come in, murder her (she was found in her bedroom but that doesn't necessarily mean she was murdered there) and get away with leaving no traces of evidence whether it be blood, hair strands, fingerprints, cigarette butts etc. I don't
believe anyone is that smart or that lucky.
I'm going to go outside the box a bit. I noticed the comments after one of the news articles. People can get real hepped up about what they call "puppy mills". They appear to care more about the dogs than the brutal murder of their owner. (who was known to have treated her dogs well.)
Could it have been an angry member of Peta? Or another competitor dog breeder? Or someone who hates "puppy mills"? Why leave behind the dogs though. Or why not set them free or take them? Did
they leave behind a "calling card?"
Was this walking a new thing of hers? Was losing weight something new?
I looked at her FB but there really wasn't much there. I'll try another one and not her personal one, maybe?
Don't be discouraged! 😊
Sent from my SM-G386T using Tapatalk