Should I edit my posts to remove reference to the tag? In this latest article EG's attorney is claiming that JH is her spouse. I was referring to evidence in support of that, and speculating in light of this new development.
Wait! There's a restraining order? Or is this just hypothetical?
Also, I would think she wouldn't be allowed to be around any of her other children, so if JH has their daughter, then that might be a pretty significant factor.
IIRC it was NG saying it near the beginning of her podcast on this case.
https://www.stitcher.com/podcast/mrw-productions-llc/crime-stories-with-nancy-grace/e/53447443
:moo:
Even if JH now claims they aren't spouses, there is evidence he publicly referred to her as such on SM. Still, there's nothing stopping him testifying against her, should he choose to do so. I've just been under the impression since his odd comments about the abuse allegations in public interviews that he's still in deep denial and would rather believe she's not responsible. Or that there are other things in the past she could throw back at him in court, should he not defend her position. Just my speculation based on public comments/actions.
I don't think spousal privilege means that a spouse cannot testify against their spouse, only that they can't be compelled to.
Stepmom of missing boy Lucas Hernandez wants lower bond, says she's not a threat
The jailed stepmother of a missing Wichita boy is asking a judge to change her bond so she can go home to her husband and have contact with the boy and other children.
Defendant does not pose a threat or harm to the community, Emily Glass attorney argues in a court document filed in Sedgwick County District Court on Friday.
Glass, 26, is the stepmother of 5-year-old Lucas Hernandez, who had been missing for 23 days as of Monday. Wichita police and the FBI have been conducting a criminal investigation of the boys disappearance. Police, volunteers and a national group have assisted in looking for Lucas.
Glasss attorney says that the stepmothers $50,000 bond is too high.
http://www.kansas.com/news/local/crime/article204719964.html
Stepmom of missing boy — Lucas Hernandez — wants lower bond, says she's not a threat
The jailed stepmother of a missing Wichita boy is asking a judge to change her bond so she can go home to her husband and have contact with the boy and other children.
“Defendant does not pose a threat or harm to the community,” Emily Glass’ attorney argues in a court document filed in Sedgwick County District Court on Friday.
Glass, 26, is the stepmother of 5-year-old Lucas Hernandez, who had been missing for 23 days as of Monday. Wichita police and the FBI have been conducting a criminal investigation of the boy’s disappearance. Police, volunteers and a national group have assisted in looking for Lucas.
Glass’s attorney says that the stepmother’s $50,000 bond is too high.
http://www.kansas.com/news/local/crime/article204719964.html
AgreedThanks! I can't listen right now but I'll take your word for it. I don't put much weight on things NG says so I don't pay too much attention to her. MOO.
Just jumping of your post
I've read very little bits of this previously, (so am uninformed)so in US a husband/wife or long term de facto cannot testify against the other ? Even if they wanted to hypothetically ? Is that right ?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
The father of a missing Wichita boy says he would welcome his wife home if she can win release from jail.
Jonathan Hernandez’s wife, Emily Glass, is seeking a lower bond so she can go home.
Glass is being held in jail on a $50,000 bond, charged with a misdemeanor — endangering the couple’s 1-year-old daughter. Before she was charged, police announced that she had also been arrested on suspicion of endangering her missing 5-year-old stepson, Lucas Hernandez. Prosecutors charged her only with endangering her daughter.
In a phone interview with The Eagle on Monday — the 23rd day that his son, Lucas, has been missing — Jonathan Hernandez said: “I am standing by her until either some other information comes out or something about the case breaks. If it involves her, obviously it would be different. Obviously, my thoughts would be changing if she was implicated in any way involving Lucas.”
Well there's our answer. He's gonna keep believing her in all likelihood.Not just SM- also in news articles.
“There shouldn’t be a lynch-mob mentality against his wife, he said.
“I realize it’s frustrating for the public not to know” what happened to Lucas, he said.
He added he remains hopeful that his son will be found OK.
If his wife can obtain a lower bond and get out of jail, it would benefit her and their children — their daughter and Lucas, Hernandez said.
“I’m sure we have a lot of things to do personally between her and me” if she gets released, he said.
Read more here: http://www.kansas.com/news/local/crime/article204752704.html#storylink=cpy”
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Have contact with 'the boy'??
Um.... what?
Wait! There's a restraining order? Or is this just hypothetical?
Also, I would think she wouldn't be allowed to be around any of her other children, so if JH has their daughter, then that might be a pretty significant factor.
Well there's our answer. He's gonna keep believing her in all likelihood.
"The father of a missing Wichita boy says he would welcome his wife home if she can win release from jail."
:gaah:
Well there's our answer. He's gonna keep believing her in all likelihood.
"The father of a missing Wichita boy says he would welcome his wife home if she can win release from jail."
:gaah: