- Joined
- Dec 16, 2009
- Messages
- 485
- Reaction score
- 1,605
An unknown man is consistent with how the investigation unfolded and was spoken about already in 2010. The supposed witnesses that saw Kyron and Terri leave together, not so much (if they are indeed properly identified by Desiree).
The police haven't acted on the information about these witnesses in 2015 (when Desiree first made her claim) anymore than they did in 2010 (based on her claim in the book). Perhaps they realized that CL would have been inside the school at the time, not in the parking lot. And perhaps the list released in December 2010 of all the adults at Skyline that morning didn't have CL's grandmother on it.
Of course, if Desiree had this info in 2010, she could have deposed the witnesses for her civil suit - their statements would have essentially proven her case.
A negative/ accusatory tone toward a grieving parent(s) and constant dismissal of her intuition/ knowledge/ victim information from law enforcement matters.
So does Occam's razor (or Ockham's razor) is a from philosophy. If an abduction has two possible explanations. The explanation that requires the fewest assumptions is usually correct. Another way of saying it is that the more assumptions you have to make, the more unlikely an explanation. Occam's razor applies especially in the philosophy of science, but also appears in everyday life.
Kyron was suffering under his stepmother. <modsnip - mischaracterization>
This imo, was done by a sickophant step parent, who lied repeatedly. And has more mental health and soul-sickness than can be covered here.
Every logical and legal step points there.
It is ashame that the D.A. in Oregon were not equipped to deal with a case of Kyron's magnitude.
Heartprints to those grieving.
imo moo omo
Last edited by a moderator: