SmoothOperator
Sadly what connects all these puzzles is that ther
- Joined
- Jul 13, 2010
- Messages
- 5,591
- Reaction score
- 80
Sorry if this was already mentioned... But does anyone else find it EXTREMELY ODD(to say the least) that according to this article, per J**** that Terri has no cell phone or computer, nor access to either call phone or computer??!!??
When we know that Terri was an avid electronic communicator.. This was one of the several "items of interest" that STOOD OUT to me when reading this??!!...
Does this mean that her atty(as it seems again per J**** that he is saying that it is her atty's instruction to NOT HAVE CELL NOR COMPUTER COMMUNICATIONS ALONG WITH ALSO "TO STAY IN THE HOUSE" and keep quiet)Is it per Houze's instruction because of what all she has possibly "added fuel to the fire" of her "appearing" guilty to the masses, by her "questionable"(at best) communications that have come to light(not to mention the communications that have NOT been "leaked" to the public)...
I just am finding it SUPER HARD to believe that this woman who "seemingly" obsessively(reminds me of how LE said that CA was obsessively communicating via various electronic modes[i.e. email and MULTIPLE cell phones also]) .. OT but I do find more and more extreme similarities in TMH and CA(sadly I'm scared it too will reach a similar outcome as CA's child)...
Just wondering if others found this hard to believe and what your thoughts were on this particular issue from this article??..
Another possibility that IMMEDIATELY sprung to mind upon reading this particular info was- Is this what J**** was just being TOLD by Terri to be the case(no communication via cell or computer)? And that it is not necessarily the truth? I pondered what motive there would be for lying about this to him(or possibly to others and it just made its way thru the "grapevine" for J**** to hear this info)? And the thoughts just off the top of my head were #1 pity, #2 look what a martyr I am, an innocent woman willing to suffer thru such inconveniences to clear my name, #3 for it to intentionally get back to the media(thus get back to LE) so they would lay off, thinking she was NO LONGER communicating electronically and her have unknown "new batphone" activated under phoney names&info (thus still attempting to "outwit" LE)...
Just some possibilities that easily came to mind..{By all means I do not claim that any of the latter is fact, rather just speculation given her recent past history}
Anyone else with thoughts on this subject? either way? Am always interested to hear those with complete opposite&opposing view&opinions of mine... But personally I find it very difficult to believe that this is indeed 100% TRUE.. but JMO, though..
When we know that Terri was an avid electronic communicator.. This was one of the several "items of interest" that STOOD OUT to me when reading this??!!...
Does this mean that her atty(as it seems again per J**** that he is saying that it is her atty's instruction to NOT HAVE CELL NOR COMPUTER COMMUNICATIONS ALONG WITH ALSO "TO STAY IN THE HOUSE" and keep quiet)Is it per Houze's instruction because of what all she has possibly "added fuel to the fire" of her "appearing" guilty to the masses, by her "questionable"(at best) communications that have come to light(not to mention the communications that have NOT been "leaked" to the public)...
I just am finding it SUPER HARD to believe that this woman who "seemingly" obsessively(reminds me of how LE said that CA was obsessively communicating via various electronic modes[i.e. email and MULTIPLE cell phones also]) .. OT but I do find more and more extreme similarities in TMH and CA(sadly I'm scared it too will reach a similar outcome as CA's child)...
Just wondering if others found this hard to believe and what your thoughts were on this particular issue from this article??..
Another possibility that IMMEDIATELY sprung to mind upon reading this particular info was- Is this what J**** was just being TOLD by Terri to be the case(no communication via cell or computer)? And that it is not necessarily the truth? I pondered what motive there would be for lying about this to him(or possibly to others and it just made its way thru the "grapevine" for J**** to hear this info)? And the thoughts just off the top of my head were #1 pity, #2 look what a martyr I am, an innocent woman willing to suffer thru such inconveniences to clear my name, #3 for it to intentionally get back to the media(thus get back to LE) so they would lay off, thinking she was NO LONGER communicating electronically and her have unknown "new batphone" activated under phoney names&info (thus still attempting to "outwit" LE)...
Just some possibilities that easily came to mind..{By all means I do not claim that any of the latter is fact, rather just speculation given her recent past history}
Anyone else with thoughts on this subject? either way? Am always interested to hear those with complete opposite&opposing view&opinions of mine... But personally I find it very difficult to believe that this is indeed 100% TRUE.. but JMO, though..
