Sure but the judge had to clarify to the jury that the ipad was Laura's. I would hope the Crown would have made that perfectly clear since it is a major piece of evidence.
I still have no clarity on just what the jury has been told about that IPad with regards to ownership. I think it's very important to establish that SL LOANED the IPad to LB so that she could use it to look for an apartment. Shannon Martin has reported, more than once, that it was Laura's IPad that SL gave to her.
It's important because if the jury believes that SL gave her the IPad to keep, then it was also hers to sell. If she knew she had to return it, that's just one more reason why MS should not have been in possession of it.
MOO