I think this is true. After this trial we will read "what the jury didn't hear"... a dumbed down version to save info for the WM trial. We will read the same after that trial... with even more info, but I think we will also read an interview with Uncle Robbie about so much more.Re post 432 - I disagree. From listening to him I would conclude that he knows a lot about DM that he can't say court, but he KNOWS him and is disgusted by him for a reason. I think the jury may see that also. They may not get to know what he knows about DM, but they will feel the disgust and understand that it has a source.
Yep. Just not yet.Is court in session today?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
I think there is a lot of evidence to show Millard acted alone. The text that told Smich not to be outside when he arrived with LB, the text that said he was on a mission during the time of the murder, tells me Smich had no clue what was going down. Did he know in advance but just didnt know the details? Maybe, but that cant be proved at this point.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Is court in session today?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
I have been following this case from the beginning but, although it seemed easy to keep track of at first, there is actually a LOT of stuff. Several days ago, someone posted a listing of who had been called up to that point, and a summary of thier connection to the case. I've searched back for an hour this morning, but can't find it. Could anyone help me out? Can you refer me to the right date or post #? Thanks
Yep. Just not yet.
Cross of Det. Jansz then possibly MM as per reporters.
Sent from my SM-G930W8 using Tapatalk
Really? So the exchange on May 28th between DM and MS about testing the incinerator with meat and bones was for a party? He knew two details, someone was going to die, and that he was going to help burn the remains. And this was before it occurred. MOO
Is the Crown notified in advance that the defendant(s) are going to testify in order to prepare cross, or do they just have to go on the fly?
Sent from my SM-G930W8 using Tapatalk
Maybe DM physically acted alone for the murder, but to say MS didnt have a clue what was going down, doesnt jive with me. Im mostly going on gut instincts at this point, but I believe this was planned by both of them. Likely these conversations took place in person, with no record. I think MS being scarce on the 3rd was part of this plan. LB had to be lured there by someone she was familiar or comfortable with, DM.
I agree that there may not be enough evidence at this point to prove MS participate in the planning of this murder; an important part of a M1 conviction. We have the procurement of the gun, the testing of the incinerator with wet bones text, the testimony of the boys in the garage, but I cant help but feel nervous as we supposedly approach the end of the crowns case.
I believe so. Judge announced he may give jurors Monday off. I'm sure they appreciate thatIMO I would assume they would like to get back to their normal lives then be given days off. Ahead of schedule perhaps? Witnesses cannot appear until Tuesday? No wonder our system is so back logged and cases get thrown out. :notgood:
I tend to agree with this. I think this has been a really great discussion regarding Dr. Burns' testimony, and I've taken into consideration everyone's opinion respectfully. I think JuneBug67 has also made some really fine points.
My opinion also takes into consideration my own personal experience. I've had to testify in court with the perpetrator in the room, and I was physically sick with disgust and nerves over what this individual did to me, and others, and having to repeat it on the stand. The cross-examination was brutal, and enraged me, and I was addressed by a lawyer, not the accused himself. For those of you who don't have this experience, I will tell you it is one of the hardest things you'll ever do in your life. Human emotion can be a very difficult thing to harness.
I can appreciate that RB's testimony may have seemed self-serving, but for him in was deeply personal. I think his contempt goes beyond what his nephew is accused of. It involves what he's accused of, but there's more to it in my opinion. Something, or many things, may have happened leading up to or in 2002. For him to specifically address this year as when their relationship dissolved, seems suspicious to me. We don't know the whole story.
I think it's important to put ourselves in the shoes of these witnesses, and think about how we might act or display on the stand if we were in the same position. It's not easy.
I think he was in on it, I just don’t think there is evidence to prove it. Smich could have been told the deer story like MM. unless there is evidence that says he was aware of a plan to murder LB prior to the actual crime, he’s innocent. Unlike TB, the death didn’t happen during the committing of another crime, so they need solid evidence here.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
This is exactly what I was thinking when I made the comment that I felt sorry for MM.
I don't feel sorry for her choices or the fact that she was involved with these people.
I feel sorry for her because she's going to have to sit in that courtroom again and point the finger and tell all she knows about DM and MS and then DM gets to go face to face with her. That will be very hard. I would be a mess. I would be afraid. I would feel sorry for me because other than having knowledge....I didn't kill anyone.
Yup, I think she had some knowledge, I am quite convinced that she was aware of the nefarious missions but I really am conflicted on if she knew other things.
MM was young, had a difficult upbringing and admittedly had a fairly serious drug problem. I'm not excusing any of that but under the circumstances I can see how she could have made bad decisions regarding DM.
She's not better or no worse than a lot of the other hangers on. She made very bad decisions but I have confidence she will tell what she knows.
MOO