- Joined
- May 2, 2009
- Messages
- 2,533
- Reaction score
- 741
And what about the size of the bones?
The deer bones appear to be about the size of a 23 year old woman.
And what about the size of the bones?
"Some chopping would be required" ?so, let's suppose it is a deer.... how did he lift it into the incinerator?
so, let's suppose it is a deer.... how did he lift it into the incinerator?
"Some chopping would be required" ?
IMO that depends on how much he is getting paid, he is a hired gun in my opinion at this point.
It could be argued that Dr. Rogers has a bit of a bias too however. She had additional knowledge as to the use of the incinerator. And the argument that Dr. Rufolo sees animal bones all day so of course he'll see animal bones here - well, the same could be said of Dr. Rogers about human bones.
Just trying to be fair to the experts.
Hey now, you leave my Flat Earth Reference Manual out of this!You can just bring any book in to use as evidence? What if it's a load of baloney?
That's just it- is he basing his testimony on two blurry photos without factoring the specifications of the eliminator?And what about the size of the bones?
It appears that DM is in the middle of the ocean, in a canoe with no paddles and a hole in the canoe, smh
The deer bones appear to be about the size of a 23 year old woman.
Especially being so tired?
Especially being so tired?
You can just bring any book in to use as evidence? What if it's a load of baloney?
And Dr. R.....could you now tell us your experience in examining and identifying bones that have actually been through an incineration process and NOT just been discovered at an archaeological site?
Yes, this is so true. Dr. Rogers has a leg up here, being in forensics.And Dr. R.....could you now tell us your experience in examining and identifying bones that have actually been through an incineration process and NOT just been discovered at an archaeological site?