The JonBenet Ramsey murder is definitely a DNA case. If DNA is found at the crime scene then it's a DNA case.
I don't know what the recent improvements have been regarding DNA testing procedures, but I'm sure there have been some. They probably involve reducing or eliminating the stutter effect in PCR DNA analyses, thus providing more reliable alleles to be included in the sample.
We should accept the fact that John and Patsy in effect have been cleared by DNA results. That leaves Burke or an intruder. IMO the intruder would have to be someone invited into the house by a Ramsey. Otherwise, why all of the Ramsey lies and the obvious coverup?
Just my opinion.
BlueCrab
I don't know what the recent improvements have been regarding DNA testing procedures, but I'm sure there have been some. They probably involve reducing or eliminating the stutter effect in PCR DNA analyses, thus providing more reliable alleles to be included in the sample.
We should accept the fact that John and Patsy in effect have been cleared by DNA results. That leaves Burke or an intruder. IMO the intruder would have to be someone invited into the house by a Ramsey. Otherwise, why all of the Ramsey lies and the obvious coverup?
Just my opinion.
BlueCrab