LIVE MSM COVERAGE on BABY LISA - 22-23 OCTOBER 2011

[Geralyn]

Apparently Terri Horman couldn't wait to tell Desiree and Kaine that she failed, and a lot of people believe she is guilty.

Well innocent or guilty, I would definitely tell my own husband if I failed a poly. (and likely the childs other bio parent)
But ftr, I do believe in that particular case, the woman is involved. jmo

 

[Geralyn]

Well, in retrospect, though, Baby Caylee wasn't in fact there. If a cadaver dog hit in the grandparents back yard, it was a false hit.

Oh? Do we know that the baby was never in that backyard at any point (once deceased?) and then moved? I didn't follow that case closely, fwiw.

 

[JeannaT]

Oh? Do we know that the baby was never in that backyard at any point (once deceased?) and then moved? I didn't follow that case closely, fwiw.

I don't know. It doesn't seem the baby was ever there - she tried to come up with some and bull story that Caylee drowned in her parent's swimming pool but since her dad sexually molested her throughout her childhood she learned to keep secrets . . . bla bla bla bla some total malarky stuff.

I guess we'll never know for sure but I don't think the baby was ever in that home after Casey killed her.

 

[Melanie]

Oh? Do we know that the baby was never in that backyard at any point (once deceased?) and then moved? I didn't follow that case closely, fwiw.

If you go by the DT's theory that caylee died in the backyard, in the pool, then it would make sense. But who the heck knows what really happened to Caylee. There's many a thread on it.

Carry on --

Mel

 

[Wise Old Owl]

I think pass or fail are the only options and I hope they drag her back in and tell her again real soon that she killed her baby. They need to scare her into speaking. OR they need to pull other people into interrogation and scare the crapola out of them so they talk. Someone knows what happened besides the parents and they need to bring them in and slip them up. I dont care if they waterboard them at this point. This is all about Lisa and not about those parents that have done nothing but lie this whole time. Nevermind the cadaver dog hit.. Way too much evidence, circumstantial as it might be, there is an abundance of it. I feel like calling the police station there and asking them why she isnt being hauled in for more questions. JI in MOO looks like someone you can scare easy, maybe they should take him in for questioning.

Do we know of any live feeds on TV/internet at all. I have searched but cant find anything at all, seems very quiet.

It isn't a "pass" or "fail" type of thing. I remember this well from the Cummings case and all of Misty's escapades.

The test is "deception indicated". Certain, pertinent questions will either be "truthful" or "deception indicated". DB is claiming on the question of do you know where Lisa is? She had a "deception indicated" result.

Does that make any sense?

JMO

 

[frankie069]

It isn't a "pass" or "fail" type of thing. I remember this well from the Cummings case and all of Misty's escapades.

The test is "deception indicated". Certain, pertinent questions will either be "truthful" or "deception indicated". DB is claiming on the question of do you know where Lisa is? She had a "deception indicated" result.

Does that make any sense?

JMO

Oh absolutely, I was just talking from the perspective that its either pass or fail in the eyes of the law. Obviously it goes deeper than that because they are inadmissible in court. They are just an indicator.

 

[frankie069]

Well, in retrospect, though, Baby Caylee wasn't in fact there. If a cadaver dog hit in the grandparents back yard, it was a false hit.

Uh, I followed that case from day one and a dog got it a hit in that backyard. It was thought there is where she possibly by Caylee on the ground and bound her before putting her in the trunk. Who ever said it was a false hit, I dont recall that unless you are talking from the defenses point of view.

 

[JSV]

There hasn't been an arrest yet or charges filed in the disappearance of Baby Lisa, but JT and BS are he!!-bent on "defending" their clients: Attack the investigation, accuse LE of shoddy police work and untrained search dogs, yada...yada...yada. Oh, and have your client admit that she was drinking to the point of (possibly) blacking out. No body, no case. Horse hash, all of it. Someone get me a barf bag, please :sick:

They are all sounding like JB & CM and the A's . IMO

 

[Bon]

Well, in retrospect, though, Baby Caylee wasn't in fact there. If a cadaver dog hit in the grandparents back yard, it was a false hit.

Not necessarily......Caylee could have been placed in the backyard until the murderess decided where to dump her...... she was alone the day she backed her car into the garage and borrowed the shovel.....no one else was there.

 

[Bon]

They are all sounding like JB & CM and the A's . IMO

It's sickening, isn' t it??? Why would anyone want to defend a person who harmed a child :waitasec:

 

[Geralyn]

It's sickening, isn' t it??? Why would anyone want to defend a person who harmed a child :waitasec:

To ensure their civil rights? .

 

[jacy]

:floorlaugh:

Bill Stanton says the questions he has include, "is the dog trained"

What do you reckon are the chances that FBI took an untrained dog there and just called it a "cadaver dog"?

:floorlaugh:

 

[JSV]

It's sickening, isn' t it??? Why would anyone want to defend a person who harmed a child :waitasec:

Yes it is very sickening .IMO They do it for their 15 min. of fame and $$$$$$$$$$.The hell with the murdered child . :furious:

 

[Bon]

To ensure their civil rights? .

And to lie and say anything else they can to get their client free.........:furious:

And JT says, I have 5 children myself....and the point is???

 

[Wise Old Owl]

Bill Stanton says the questions he has include, "is the dog trained"

What do you reckon are the chances that FBI took an untrained dog there and just called it a "cadaver dog"?

I sure hope someone handed BS the article where it was reported that

"The FBI Forensic Canine Unit" is now in Kansas City.

Me thinks those are probably some of the best of the best - KWIM?

 

[Oriah]

I sure hope someone handed BS the article where it was reported that

"The FBI Forensic Canine Unit" is now in Kansas City.

Me thinks those are probably some of the best of the best - KWIM?

All I can say is... good luck with that one, Bill. :beagle:

 

[Oriah]

And to lie and say anything else they can to get their client free.........:furious:

And JT says, I have 5 children myself....and the point is???

I *think* that post was meant to convey that many criminal defense attorneys do their job out of respect and honor for protecting law, and in particular the 'innocent until proven guilty.'
There are certainly plenty of unethical ones out there (as there are in every profession) but there are also ethical ones.
And that has nothing to do with my opinion on what these particular ones are.

Just that I think that post was very accurate, and very sensitive to the many attorneys who believe in upholding constitutional rights.

 

[marge_rita]

Not necessarily......Caylee could have been placed in the backyard until the murderess decided where to dump her...... she was alone the day she backed her car into the garage and borrowed the shovel.....no one else was there.

:seeya: Bon,
That's what I believe happened. As someone posted yesterday, killers often move bodies.

imo

 

[curiousc]

Does anyone have the full hardcopy article featured in People Magazine?

Did JI state that he was supposed to be home at 10 p.m. from Starbucks but that the work took longer than expected? Did he also claim he could not phone home from the work cell in his pocket?

If I am correct it would be in this edition:

http://www.people.com/people/article/0,,20539176,00.html

 

[Bon]

I *think* that post was meant to convey that many criminal defense attorneys do their job out of respect and honor for protecting law, and in particular the 'innocent until proven guilty.'
There are certainly plenty of unethical ones out there (as there are in every profession) but there are also ethical ones.
And that has nothing to do with my opinion on what these particular ones are.

Just that I think that post was very accurate, and very sensitive to the many attorneys who believe in upholding constitutional rights.

And you are certainly entitled to your opinion as I am to mine