long weekend break: discuss the latest here #114

Status
Not open for further replies.
  • #741
  • #742
Now why is it that his face was not shown? Seems weird. He seems to still like her. And she him??

Doubt she "likes" him but she'll milk him dry and use him as much as possible. He'd be smart to educate himself on sociopathy.
 
  • #743
I can't remember if it was Jodi or DB that Juan was questioning but Juan mentioned if MM was outside waiting on Jodi when she went to visit DB? He may have been talking to DB, iirc....I just thought it was an odd statement not knowing if MM was with Jodi on her visit to see DB...the way Juan stated that...i just thought that maybe MM was, indeed, with Jodi. Someone else may remember what I'm talking about.


I do and yes it was brought up by Mr. Martinez to DB and DB denied that MM was but the way he denied this made me suspect that MM was there. And, now that I've observed Mr. Martinez in action, I'm even more convinced now that MM was there that day. I just haven't figured out why yet.
 
  • #744
Got some activity on the case history:

Filing Date Description Docket Date Filing Party
3/31/2013 MOT - Motion - Party (001) 4/1/2013
NOTE: MOTION FOR MISTRIAL: JUROR MISCONDUCT
3/31/2013 OBJ - Objection/Opposition. - Party (001) 4/1/2013
NOTE: DEDEFENDANT’S OBJECTION TO ELICITING TESTIMONY OR MAKING ARGUMENT RELATED TO AGGRAVATING CIRCUMSTANCES FOR WHICH PROBABLE CAUSE HAS NOT BEEN FOUND
 
  • #745
Someone posted upthread that there are only two days of court this week. Is that true?
 
  • #746
Nurmi is trying everything he can to cause a mistrial . The jurors have all been questioned so what's the point.

Agree. The closer it gets to Trial finishing I am sure we will see more. Gosh i lost track with CA's Defense Team filing motions.
 
  • #747
If there's a mistrial? We start all over? Would nurmi be her attorney for the mistrial?
Maybe nurmi is worried that this jury has pretty much made up their minds.

Oh I'm sure he is and he should be. He's just bloviating smoke as usual. I mean the ENTIRE jury would have to be involved in some kind of misconduct to start this shindig all over again. It would have to be catastrophic for that to even be considered.

I think this is all attempting to disarm Martinez. He knows the most devastating part of the entire trial is coming: the rebuttal case. He's posturing.

No mistrial is coming....this Judge is seriously protecting the record. Juror misconduct/prosecutorial misconduct is all he's got to work with as what's happening in the courtroom is flawless to his murderer client.
 
  • #748
Someone posted upthread that there are only two days of court today. Is that true?

No. :nono: Not two days of court today, but two days of court this week. :giggle:
 
  • #749
I read a few pages back there will only be 2 days of trial this week. Could someone clarify. I know we have trial tomorrow and never on Friday so wondering what the other day is for no trial.
 
  • #750
  • #751
Not me. This is probably related to a juror sitting on the sidewalk eating ice cream after court one day. This defense is desperate at this point. Remember there are 6 sitting alternates. If ONE juror has done anything "misconducty" there are many alternates to be seated.

The only other thing that came to mind... KatieDDJ and the guest said last week that they've seen jurors talking to each other during sidebars and stuff. I don't remember exactly what was said but they were talking about jurors forming bonds. Aren't they not allowed to talk at all until deliberation? I think I asked that on the legal thread and they said it was not allowed on criminal trials. Any chance that's what it's about? It would explain why JA kept staring and getting JW's attention.

I just want to add that I think it would have to be something HUGE for the judge to grant a mistrial. The defense is going to nitpick everything they can because they know it's not going well for them! I would be pizzed! Not only would that make all of this one long practice trial for her, but it would be $1.4+ million of our tax money down the drain!
 
  • #752
  • #753
  • #754
Not me. This is probably related to a juror sitting on the sidewalk eating ice cream after court one day. This defense is desperate at this point. Remember there are 6 sitting alternates. If ONE juror has done anything "misconducty" there are many alternates to be seated.

That's what I don't understand. If one has done something that is the reason to have alternates.

It still scares me because I do not trust the court system. Seems like defence team slimy tactics are becoming the norm for these high profile cases.

I know how I feel when I see/read such things and it feels like I am punched in the stomach because I worry that these shenanigans may work.

I cannot even imagine how Travis' family must feel.
 
  • #755
There has been a motion filed for mistrial, juror misconduct.

Filing Date Description Docket Date Filing Party
3/31/2013 MOT - Motion - Party (001) 4/1/2013
NOTE: MOTION FOR MISTRIAL: JUROR MISCONDUCT
3/31/2013 OBJ - Objection/Opposition. - Party (001) 4/1/2013


http://www.superiorcourt.maricopa.g...rtCases/caseInfo.asp?caseNumber=CR2008-031021

I'm a firm believer that the DT knows that they are riding a sinking boat so they are doing everything they can. Of course they got the right to do that, but then it is a waste of time in my opinion.
 
  • #756
Not me. This is probably related to a juror sitting on the sidewalk eating ice cream after court one day. This defense is desperate at this point. Remember there are 6 sitting alternates. If ONE juror has done anything "misconducty" there are many alternates to be seated.

It was reported on HLN, I believe, that this person was out having ice cream on Thursday, too, after court. So either the judge didn't ask about any of the juror's sitting outside or it was decided nothing was wrong with them sitting there.

The real issue is HLN complaining about it when there doesn't seem to be a problem. HLN should not be revealing who the juror is by constantly describing this person as sitting outside the courthouse eating an ice cream. If JC had an issue with it she probably should have brought it to attention of the District Attorney's office. Going on National TV and announcing it without this person having any knowledge seems unfair to the juror. If they were out again on Thursday obviously they were still clueless or determined that they would not be denied that ice cream they deserved after sitting through ALV recitation. lol Good lord, these jurors are not under house arrest. And they wonder why juror don't want to be on juries.
 
  • #757
  • #758
  • #759
  • #760
Anyone have any info on the Mistrial motion Nouri filed today for Jury Misconduct?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
107
Guests online
2,510
Total visitors
2,617

Forum statistics

Threads
632,675
Messages
18,630,305
Members
243,245
Latest member
St33l
Back
Top