Still Missing MA - Ana Walshe, 39, allegedly left home, may have been dismembered, Cohasset, Jan 2023 *husband indicted* #4

  • #961
Oh boy, I'm not understanding the sentencing part they are talking about.
 
  • #962
  • #963
BREAKING: It appears Brian Walshe is prepared to plead GUILTY but not to Murder. He is pleading guilty to Misleading police and Improper conveyance of a human body (removing Ana's body from the residence). This is crazy news happening right before jury selection begins.

 
Last edited:
  • #964
I don't like that he can plead guilty without at least having to explain where he disposed of AW. Court TV is unclear on what he is actually pleading guilty to and seems to be suggesting that it's toward the lessor charge or indictment. I guess we have to wait a bit for clarity.

Court TV is my link
he plead to these indictments
002 willfully misleading a criminal investigation
003 willfully conveying away a human body
He's not admitting to murder or dumping her in the dumpster
 
  • #965
Apparently they are still going to move forward with the homicide charge and pick the jury. Does that mean that all of his google searches won't be entered into evidence? Is this the strategy here?
 
  • #966
  • #967
He better not claim that she "tripped over dogs and fell" and then he panicked or something like that! This is insane.
 
  • #968
He better not claim that she "tripped over dogs and fell" and then he panicked or something like that! This is insane.
That's exactly what he is going to do. 'It was an accident' and like you said 'I panicked' He's a con man and this is his way to con the jury. I bet he absolutely loves this strategy.
 
  • #969
Who doesn't panic and react with power tools?

He's insane if he thinks anyone will believe any of what he did was accidental.

I hope his guilty pleas garner him no favor, no mercy.

JMO
 
  • #970
  • #971
  • #972
  • #973
  • #974
 
  • #975
[…]

Judge Diane C. Freniere said from the bench that she wouldn’t sentence Walshe on the two lesser counts until the end of the trial.

[…]

At one point during Walshe’s hearing Tuesday, Assistant Norfolk District Attorney Gregory P. Connor told Freniere that there was an issue with accepting the guilty plea.

“Count three revolves around improper disposal of Ms. Walshe’s remains,” Connor said. “The defendant, when asked his marriage status [by Freniere on Tuesday] said that he was married. And consequently, your honor, then that is not an accurate relaying of his current status to the court, and could be invalidating the plea.”

Connor said that Walshe “has to be asked that question again, and I believe that if he continues to say he’s married, that he is negating facts of count three.”

Following a sidebar conference, Freniere addressed Walshe on the matter.

“Under the law, death extinguishes marriage,” Freniere instructed the defendant. “It may not religiously, or otherwise, spiritually. But under the law, when someone dies, or when someone is dead, you can no longer be married to them. Do you understand that?”

“Yes, your honor,” Walshe replied.

[…]

 
  • #976
Brian Walshe faces a maximum sentence of 10 years on the misleading police charge with up to a 20-year sentence enhancement if convicted of murder. He faces up to 3 years in prison on the conveyance charge.
……..
Prosecutors have said they plan to call up to 60 witnesses in the state’s case against Walshe.


https://www.cnn.com/2025/11/18/us/brian-walshe-trial-case-charges
 
  • #977
  • #978
When a defendant resolves only part of a case, trial judges must decide how much of that resolved conduct a jury is permitted to hear.

Courts generally try to prevent jurors from inferring guilt from unrelated or already-decided charges, but some of that information can still appear if it is directly relevant to proving elements of the unresolved offense.

This creates a delicate balance: jurors cannot be told to consider the resolved crimes as propensity evidence, yet the prosecution can introduce facts tied to the same course of conduct if they are essential to establishing motive, intent, or identity.

The judge’s rulings on these evidentiary boundaries often become some of the most consequential decisions in a murder trial.

Partial pleas also narrow the defense options. Once a defendant has admitted to misleading investigators or improperly handling remains, the defense can no longer argue a narrative inconsistent with those admitted facts. In practical terms, the defense must build the remaining strategy around a foundation they no longer control.

 
  • #979
[…]

Brian Walshe changed his pleas on counts No. 2 and No. 3. That includes willfully conveying a human body in violation of state law and misleading police. Prosecutors claimed that his interference led to the destruction of his wife's remains.

"The delays resulted in the contents of dumpsters in which the defendant disposed of Ana Walshe’s remains being incinerated," the prosecutor said.

"Mr. Walshe is prepared to admit to the recitation of facts with respect to the indictment that the government just read in so far as it alleges he did impede and obstruct the criminal investigation into the disappearance of Anna Walshe. We obviously object, and he's not admitting to and murder. The second portion of the facts that the government just read," his defense attorney said. "That we would take issue with, is the last sentence."

[…]

During the final pre-trial hearing on Monday, Brian Walshe waved and smiled at his mother, who was in the courtroom but not listed on the witness list. She was asked to leave while parties discussed how she hired a private investigator to look into an alleged affair Ana Walshe was having with another man.

[…]

 
  • #980
I don't like that he can plead guilty without at least having to explain where he disposed of AW.

It is believed by law enforcement that he disposed of her body parts in dumpsters that were subsequently incinerated.

Apparently they are still going to move forward with the homicide charge and pick the jury. Does that mean that all of his google searches won't be entered into evidence? Is this the strategy here?

That is what it looks like to me. If so, it's a very clever play by his defence attorneys .Those google searches were damning.
 

Guardians Monthly Goal

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
131
Guests online
1,931
Total visitors
2,062

Forum statistics

Threads
635,351
Messages
18,674,345
Members
243,172
Latest member
TX Terri
Back
Top