Still Missing MA - Ana Walshe, 39, allegedly left home, may have been dismembered, Cohasset, Jan 2023 *husband indicted* #4

  • #1,261
Is this defense attorney talking about p hub search terms just to take up time because he has no case?
 
  • #1,262
The Defense is doing a bang up job securing Brian's conviction.

JMO
 
  • #1,263
The defense is making a fool of himself.
He is literally helping the prosecution. I bet they are very pleased right now.
 
  • #1,264
Jury dismissed for the day.
 
  • #1,265
This is the worst defense strategy I've ever heard, woelrse than sweatered ninjas.

I guess, by pleading guilty to some of the charges, it takes that power away from the jury, lest they get so weary of finding Brian guikty, they just slip a guilty in for murder, too.

But this really messes with the State's case. I'm sure the prosecution was preparing to try him on all the charges. Hence Uber, Lyft, BlueJet witnesses. Proving Ana never went anywhere...

But we're all agreed. Ana was dead that night. All that's left for the jury is to decide if he killed her or if she just happened to die naturally, right before he hacksawed her.

It'll take the jury longer to fill out the verdict form then to deliberate.

JMO
 
  • #1,266
The Defense is doing a bang up job securing Brian's conviction.

JMO
Totally!! I just cannot. What a complete jackA!
 
  • #1,267
This is the worst defense strategy I've ever heard, woelrse than sweatered ninjas.

I guess, by pleading guilty to some of the charges, it takes that power away from the jury, lest they get so weary of finding Brian guikty, they just slip a guilty in for murder, too.

But this really messes with the State's case. I'm sure the prosecution was preparing to try him on all the charges. Hence Uber, Lyft, BlueJet witnesses. Proving Ana never went anywhere...

But we're all agreed. Ana was dead that night. All that's left for the jury is to decide if he killed her or if she just happened to die naturally, right before he hacksawed her.

It'll take the jury longer to fill out the verdict form then to deliberate.

JMO
Agree his defense is just plain silly. He would have been better off claiming he lost control when he found out about her affair. Personally I think he was using her as a cash cow. JMOO
 
  • #1,268
@cathyrusson


I know I'm probably stating the obvious, but if Ana Walshe died on her own and Brian Walshe had nothing to do with it, an autopsy would show that. Brian would have received the $1 million in life insurance money, paid off his restitution in the art fraud case, and no longer had to deal with a cheating wife. The jury isn't stupid.


4:25 PM · Dec 2, 2025






 
  • #1,269
  • #1,270
This is the worst defense strategy I've ever heard, woelrse than sweatered ninjas.

I guess, by pleading guilty to some of the charges, it takes that power away from the jury, lest they get so weary of finding Brian guikty, they just slip a guilty in for murder, too.

But this really messes with the State's case. I'm sure the prosecution was preparing to try him on all the charges. Hence Uber, Lyft, BlueJet witnesses. Proving Ana never went anywhere...

But we're all agreed. Ana was dead that night. All that's left for the jury is to decide if he killed her or if she just happened to die naturally, right before he hacksawed her.

It'll take the jury longer to fill out the verdict form then to deliberate.

JMO
Yeah, I'm not expecting the jury to need much time for this one
 
  • #1,271
  • #1,272
  • #1,273
gifted no paywall
Seeing BW gripping the rosary beads reminds me of Michi - remember when she wore the rosary as a necklace in the early days? ( Dulos case )

"Prosecutors spent most of the first day of Brian Walshe’s murder trial playing tapes of his lies, but on Tuesday, they let a series of gruesome computer searches speak for themselves."


 
  • #1,274
gifted no paywall
Seeing BW gripping the rosary beads reminds me of Michi - remember when she wore the rosary as a necklace in the early days? ( Dulos case )

"Prosecutors spent most of the first day of Brian Walshe’s murder trial playing tapes of his lies, but on Tuesday, they let a series of gruesome computer searches speak for themselves."


This quote is from your linked article - I'd like clarification from anyone who cares to share. TIA

"He also asked if Gaurino had “no probable cause” to search into Walshe’s devices earlier than Christmas Day, and Guarino said that was correct. Walshe has been charged with first degree murder, which requires premeditation, something that the defense is likely going to try to chip away at and disprove throughout the trial."

So it sounds like this is the basis of the defense - premeditation. Are they saying that you cannot prove first degree murder in MA without that? Help me, my brain is useless since the bombshell in the Rebecca Park case today. How could this be possible? Explain it to me like I am a five year old.

And thank you @waldojabba for the gifted article.
 
  • #1,275

Art fraudster Brian Walshe has finally revealed his version of events for the day his wife Ana Walshe disappeared - claiming he found her suddenly dead in bed and disposed of her body in a state of panic.

Walshe, 50, is accused of murdering the successful realtor and mother of his three children at their home in Cohasset, Massachusetts, on New Year’s Day 2023, before dismembering her body and disposing of it in multiple dumpsters.

At the time, Walshe was facing jail for selling fake Andy Warhol paintings and Ana was allegedly having an affair with another man.
 
  • #1,276
😆😆😆😆😆
 
  • #1,277
This quote is from your linked article - I'd like clarification from anyone who cares to share. TIA

"He also asked if Gaurino had “no probable cause” to search into Walshe’s devices earlier than Christmas Day, and Guarino said that was correct. Walshe has been charged with first degree murder, which requires premeditation, something that the defense is likely going to try to chip away at and disprove throughout the trial."

So it sounds like this is the basis of the defense - premeditation. Are they saying that you cannot prove first degree murder in MA without that? Help me, my brain is useless since the bombshell in the Rebecca Park case today. How could this be possible? Explain it to me like I am a five year old.

And thank you @waldojabba for the gifted article.
A lawyer should weigh in for you but here is my 2 cents

IMO Premeditation in Massachusetts state court can be shown to happen minutes before - It does not have to happen days or even weeks before - it does not require extensive planning. Lawyer Lipton is just posturing and making a gigantic fool of himself.

See link below re Murder One

IMO ... this may be a tough hurdle - I am convinced he murdered her and def lean towards premedtated/intentional - but, could it have been done after drinking then having words etc and he whacks her or pushes her and she hits her head ? Accidentally?
I believe he will take the stand ( he has zero to lose in doing that and he loves the spotlight and to spin his web). But probably a game day decision.
What will he say when the P asks him the tough questions - have to wait and see but he is a natural liar so I think we will never know for sure what really went down. Even if I believe he told the mother what he did - would I even trust that version - I guess not.

****
 
  • #1,278
sorry y'all this is this worst of the worst no words
 
  • #1,279

Guardians Monthly Goal

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
74
Guests online
1,266
Total visitors
1,340

Forum statistics

Threads
635,406
Messages
18,675,614
Members
243,208
Latest member
HelpFindGus
Back
Top