- Joined
- Oct 22, 2018
- Messages
- 19,462
- Reaction score
- 314,109
If she's that fragile/intent, she's not fit for trial.
JMO
Then a ruling needs to be made after expert evidence is presented to the judge.If she's that fragile/intent, she's not fit for trial.
JMO
Then a ruling needs to be made after expert evidence is presented to the judge.
Justice can't be suspended or prevented for every person whose counsel says they might kill themselves. Otherwise, everyone will be saying it and nobody will ever face a jury.
MOO
Exercise bands are what she used to strangle the children.
Like you, I wonder at the fact that the first killing did not jar her loose from whatever reality she was occupying at that moment. IMO, she must have been caught in a terrible quicksand of destruction/self-harm/despair/depression/self-loathing - I can't guess - and unable escape from it. Perhaps that's what compelled her to jump from the second-storey window, looking to flee the last bit of self-awareness forever.
The tweet from Daily Mail twisted his words. He did say she has remained suicidal, but was making the point that precautions need to be taken in all aspects of her transport due to her suicidal ideations. Not only does she need appropriate medical care, she needs appropriate mental health care as well.First of all, her lawyer's statement seems highly inappropriate. Is he trying to prevent a trial?
If she's judged fit for trial, bring her to court and set up her jail cell to remove all articles that could be used to commit suicide.
Would you be willing to expand on this information, especially the self-medicating?It also took time in between each little child and baby to strangle them with those 'forget what they were' called. Nothing snapped in?? There are also details that are not public in this. If the jury hears them and her own self medicating long before this, she may not be sent to a pysch. hospital for life. IMO