MISTRIAL MA - Professor Karen Read, 43, charged with murdering police officer boyfriend John O'Keefe by hitting him with car, Canton, 14 Apr 2023 #18

Status
Not open for further replies.
  • #401

2/6/25

Read Claims "Clear" Brady Violation. Commonwealth Claims "Misrepresentation" Of Facts. Who's Right?​

So Peter, the LYK predicted J Cannone was showing signs of leaning towards a reimbursement or maybe partial reimbursement.

Am really interested to see LYK take on her denial of the motion. AJ will now make a specific claim for material sanction for discovery violation re withholding video evidence? When is he going to even have time??

I"m not understanding how it's fair to the defense that they have so little time to go through the large amount of discovery just released to them by the pros ( new experts etc). Or how they can thoroughly get to the bottom of the Brady violations ( for eg depose this Ex Canton employee about why video was kept on an iCloud account and doled out piecemeal; have the offending PA, Lally, testify at hearing) and adequately prep for MTD by Feb 21st. Defense asked for two more weeks but no, no, Judge Cannone is obsessed with trial going ahead April 1st and seems to have no issue with Brennan just now releasing a boat load of new discovery.

Why,? How is this fair? Are these potential appellate issues, defense being ham strung time wise to adequately prepare when pros does last minute discovery dump? And from watching the hearing, seems to proudly claim how much, 15 different categories etc with no fear of reprimand from court for why it took so long? . Holy Moly. Jmo

ETA by way of contrast, in the Idaho student murders case, the deadline for expert disclosures for the prosecution has just gone. Defense has to have theirs disclosed by end of this month IIRC. The trial is scheduled to commence August 11th.
 
Last edited:
  • #402
So Peter, the LYK predicted J Cannone was showing signs of leaning towards a reimbursement or maybe partial reimbursement.

Am really interested to see LYK take on her denial of the motion. AJ will now make a specific claim for material sanction for discovery violation re withholding video evidence? When is he going to even have time??

I"m not understanding how it's fair to the defense that they have so little time to go through the large amount of discovery just released to them by the pros ( new experts etc). Or how they can thoroughly get to the bottom of the Brady violations ( for eg depose this Ex Canton employee about why video was kept on an iCloud account and doled out piecemeal; have the offending PA, Lally, testify at hearing) and adequately prep for MTD by Feb 21st. Defense asked for two more weeks but no, no, Judge Cannone is obsessed with trial going ahead April 1st and seems to have no issue with Brennan just now releasing a boat load of new discovery.

Why,? How is this fair? Are these potential appellate issues, defense being ham strung time wise to adequately prepare when pros does last minute discovery dump? And from watching the hearing, seems to proudly claim how much, 15 different categories etc with no fear of reprimand from court for why it took so long? . Holy Moly. Jmo

ETA by way of contrast, in the Idaho student murders case, the deadline for expert disclosures for the prosecution has just gone. Defense has to have theirs disclosed by end of this month IIRC. The trial is scheduled to commence August 11th.

The judge is staying true to her usual rulings that in no way are fair or favor or are due the defense. It seems I will be sitting through another repeat of the first trial.JMO
 
  • #403
The judge is staying true to her usual rulings that in no way are fair or favor or are due the defense. It seems I will be sitting through another repeat of the first trial.JMO
Going back to my prior resolution and not watching any more hearings or commentary. Too frustrating and to believe for a moment judge may have to be fair via some court rule or other. Will check in for rulings and looking forward to reading defense MTD though.
 
  • #404
Learning today that Canton PD retained video on an unknown cloud that was allegedly unknown to the CW and the defense is absolutely insane! Nonetheless-- this does not excuse the CW from their obligation to produce evidence to the defense from their own PD. And yes, likely corruption! JMO
Probably withheld until it could be worked on! JMO
 
  • #405
Sorry, the bias against the defense by this Court is blatant. All eyes on the Court, and Cannone doubles down... o_O
 
  • #406
From what I'm seeing on several places on social media the FKR defense fund raised over $12,000 hours after Cannone denied the defense motion for reimbursement.
 
  • #407
  • #408
Thanks for sharing that link @keek ….. and this quote from the article…… well let’s just say it is ‘ripe’:

“Cannone denied their request to make the state pay the fee and noted in her decision that the defense should have known there was a chance the video they sought did not exist.”

I wish the judge would explain why one should have known there was a chance that evidence in the trial might not exist.

Is it perhaps just maybe because trooper proctor was involved with the case? Is that what was meant by that?

How about that FBI / third party investigation report Judge Cannone? Is that available yet?

Simply SMH. And yes @jepop …. a resolution to not follow might be in order. But I fear maybe that is exactly what the CW and judge want? I best stop now. MOO
 
  • #409
Thanks for sharing that link @keek ….. and this quote from the article…… well let’s just say it is ‘ripe’:

“Cannone denied their request to make the state pay the fee and noted in her decision that the defense should have known there was a chance the video they sought did not exist.”

I wish the judge would explain why one should have known there was a chance that evidence in the trial might not exist.

Is it perhaps just maybe because trooper proctor was involved with the case? Is that what was meant by that?

How about that FBI / third party investigation report Judge Cannone? Is that available yet?

Simply SMH. And yes @jepop …. a resolution to not follow might be in order. But I fear maybe that is exactly what the CW and judge want? I best stop now. MOO
Exactly...should of known, etc etc. etc. More disgustingness.
 
  • #410
  • #411
She admitted to being angry with John O’Keefe that night.

She accelerated her powerful SUV into reverse to 24.2 mph over 62 feet of distance.
So after she hit him/clipped him…what happened next… a pedestrian struck hit/clipped so hard he is knocked out of his shoe, he falls to the ground, hitting his head? Causing head trauma/head injuries.

For whatever reason, she’s unable to remain silent - she interviews with several media sources about that night.

Suggesting guilt, leaving confessions… along the way; trying to come to terms with what she did, those crucial moments. Make it make sense.


I hit him
Did I hit him
Did I clip him
Did I hit his knee
I ran over his foot

Did I incapacitate him unwittingly somehow and then in his drunkenness he passed out

First Responders testified that the lady with blood on her face said I hit him - I hit him - I hit him


"She was just pacing down the hallway, asking what could've happened," the niece testified. "She said, 'Maybe I did something.' Later, she said, ‘Maybe a snowplow hit him.’”

Her father said: She felt she struck something. She said, Dad, I think I struck something.

One of the friends told police she called her at 5 a.m. and said, "John's dead, I wonder if he's dead. It's snowing, he got hit by a plow.”

Did I clip him, did I hit him… I hit him I hit him, could I have hit him
I didnt mortally wounded him while in his drunkenness…
He didnt look mortally wounded as far as I could see (when did you see him wounded???… she spotted him immediately under a mound of snow)


And then he passed out drunk
I didn’t think I hit him, hit him; but could I have clipped him



GPS shows John’s movement stopped at 12:32 am.
John never went into the house
Her vehicle hooks up to John’s wifi at 12:36:16 am.

She drives away from 34F…it’s a six minute drive back to John’s house; though it can easily be made in four minutes. She’s still raging, angry…


She called her parents around 1:10 a.m. on Jan. 29, then again at 4:40 a.m. and 4:42 a.m.

Google search by her allegedly made for DUI attorneys at 1:27 pm on January 29, 2022 before her interview with State Police troopers.



Arraignment: She hit him but she did not realize it; and there was no intent. Pled not guilty.


If someone shows you who they are, believe them.
There is truth in those interviews.

John O’Keefe is dead: not because of a cover up, or a conspiracy, or because of a 17 year old, or because of BA, or BH, or a dog, or every witness who testified in the first trial. None of those people are responsible they are victims.

The family and friends of John O’Keefe have been attacked unfairly; and thats an understatement. They all are victims.

She is not the victim.

Defense's job is not to prove what happened to John O’Keefe, but to cause reasonable doubt. They tainted the case before it even went to trial. Look the other way. Look at the conspiracy, look at the poor police work and the bad cops. Now, they’re retooling.

They continue to retool and create stories for the public to look the other way… look any way but at KR, the person of interest— the only person ever accused of hitting her boyfriend John O’Keefe and leaving the scene of a collision resulting in death.

I took a deep dive into the case and stopped focusing on everything done wrong (as no case is perfect) and the facts showed up. Choosing to follow factual evidence so that I could see the truth of the matter. All I wanted was the truth. Its there.

All an opinion and based on news articles, trial, and media videos
 
  • #412
 
  • #413
Today

'Part One Of Karen Read's Latest Interview - How Will Prosecutors Use This?'​


 
  • #414
She admitted to being angry with John O’Keefe that night.

She accelerated her powerful SUV into reverse to 24.2 mph over 62 feet of distance.
So after she hit him/clipped him…what happened next… a pedestrian struck hit/clipped so hard he is knocked out of his shoe, he falls to the ground, hitting his head? Causing head trauma/head injuries.

For whatever reason, she’s unable to remain silent - she interviews with several media sources about that night.

Suggesting guilt, leaving confessions… along the way; trying to come to terms with what she did, those crucial moments. Make it make sense.


I hit him
Did I hit him
Did I clip him
Did I hit his knee
I ran over his foot

Did I incapacitate him unwittingly somehow and then in his drunkenness he passed out

First Responders testified that the lady with blood on her face said I hit him - I hit him - I hit him


"She was just pacing down the hallway, asking what could've happened," the niece testified. "She said, 'Maybe I did something.' Later, she said, ‘Maybe a snowplow hit him.’”

Her father said: She felt she struck something. She said, Dad, I think I struck something.

One of the friends told police she called her at 5 a.m. and said, "John's dead, I wonder if he's dead. It's snowing, he got hit by a plow.”

Did I clip him, did I hit him… I hit him I hit him, could I have hit him
I didnt mortally wounded him while in his drunkenness…
He didnt look mortally wounded as far as I could see (when did you see him wounded???… she spotted him immediately under a mound of snow)


And then he passed out drunk
I didn’t think I hit him, hit him; but could I have clipped him



GPS shows John’s movement stopped at 12:32 am.
John never went into the house
Her vehicle hooks up to John’s wifi at 12:36:16 am.

She drives away from 34F…it’s a six minute drive back to John’s house; though it can easily be made in four minutes. She’s still raging, angry…


She called her parents around 1:10 a.m. on Jan. 29, then again at 4:40 a.m. and 4:42 a.m.

Google search by her allegedly made for DUI attorneys at 1:27 pm on January 29, 2022 before her interview with State Police troopers.



Arraignment: She hit him but she did not realize it; and there was no intent. Pled not guilty.


If someone shows you who they are, believe them.
There is truth in those interviews.

John O’Keefe is dead: not because of a cover up, or a conspiracy, or because of a 17 year old, or because of BA, or BH, or a dog, or every witness who testified in the first trial. None of those people are responsible they are victims.

The family and friends of John O’Keefe have been attacked unfairly; and thats an understatement. They all are victims.

She is not the victim.

Defense's job is not to prove what happened to John O’Keefe, but to cause reasonable doubt. They tainted the case before it even went to trial. Look the other way. Look at the conspiracy, look at the poor police work and the bad cops. Now, they’re retooling.

They continue to retool and create stories for the public to look the other way… look any way but at KR, the person of interest— the only person ever accused of hitting her boyfriend John O’Keefe and leaving the scene of a collision resulting in death.

I took a deep dive into the case and stopped focusing on everything done wrong (as no case is perfect) and the facts showed up. Choosing to follow factual evidence so that I could see the truth of the matter. All I wanted was the truth. Its there.

All an opinion and based on news articles, trial, and media videos

I bet the home owners will get some serious sh##
‘No he is a Boston Cop’
‘Tell them the guy did not come into the house’
In the list of people at the house that night the 17 years old name referenced above, was missing.
‘Hos long to die in the cold’ googled at 2.27am
Jen McCabes bizarre testimony
Buzzard 911 call.
I could go on.
 
  • #415
Monday's hearing concluded after several hours, and a state police representative announced that at least one more will be needed. Proctor is due back at police headquarters in Framingham on Thursday, March 13, and if another day is needed, that Friday as well.
The hearings are not open to the public.
When the trial board hearing concludes, any recommendations would be sent to the leader of the state police, Col. Geoffrey Noble, and to the state’s POST Commission. There's no timeline for how long that would take.
 
  • #416
BOSTON — The Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts on Tuesday morning is expected to publish its ruling on Karen Read’s fight to drop two of three criminal charges she faces in the January 2022 death of her Boston police officer boyfriend John O’Keefe.
 
  • #417
Motion denied. Welp. I really didn't think there was a chance for dismissal but really the way the "judge" handled the the trial there was no way this was going to go well for Read. Such a joke.
 
  • #418
BOSTON – The state's highest court ruled that Karen Read, a Mansfield woman accused of killing her Boston police officer boyfriend, Braintree native John O'Keefe, can be retried on all three charges, including second-degree murder, following a mistrial in July.
 
  • #419
  • #420
Websleuths will be off-line temporarily on Friday, Feb. 14th. For more info CLICK HERE
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
75
Guests online
1,983
Total visitors
2,058

Forum statistics

Threads
632,532
Messages
18,628,005
Members
243,184
Latest member
hgsdg68
Back
Top