MISTRIAL MA - Professor Karen Read, 43, charged with murdering police officer boyfriend John O'Keefe by hitting him with car, Canton, 14 Apr 2023 #18

Status
Not open for further replies.
  • #1,101
I keep reading about how nobody (except Julie Nagel's vision of a "black blob") saw anyone on the lawn outside 34 Fairview when leaving the home that night. Does it not occur to anyone that, with snow, most objects are EASIER to see, especially in the dark? This makes me think that there was NO body there until WELL after the CW's timeline. Whether he was placed there by someone from the house, or stumbled there grossly injured after leaving, I can't be sure, BUT I'm certain that if he were there, he would've been noticed, especially by the plow driver, Lucky.
Lucky - the same guy that hit the basketball hoop thingy?
 
  • #1,102
  • #1,103
I keep reading about how nobody (except Julie Nagel's vision of a "black blob") saw anyone on the lawn outside 34 Fairview when leaving the home that night. Does it not occur to anyone that, with snow, most objects are EASIER to see, especially in the dark? This makes me think that there was NO body there until WELL after the CW's timeline. Whether he was placed there by someone from the house, or stumbled there grossly injured after leaving, I can't be sure, BUT I'm certain that if he were there, he would've been noticed, especially by the plow driver, Lucky.

I've driven by Fairview many times at night. Your point about snow is well-taken but even without snow there is sufficient ambient light to see a large (John was a solid, over 6 footer) body on the lawn. There is a very big highway-style street light on the other side of the Albert driveway and I would imagine Nicole had the front lights on. (I think she testified she did, to encourage people to use the main entrance and not the side one.) And then there are the headlights....

One other thing about 34 Fairview that I think is really hard to appreciate from photos is that the front lawn is actually pretty small/short and closer to the street than the photos make it appear. It's simply impossible for me to imagine anyone missing a body there as they walked and drove by.
 
  • #1,104
The Medical Examiner was awful. Really awful. IMO
I would note that between the medical examiner and the lead investigator on this case, only one of them has been dishonorably discharged and fired for misconduct…
 
  • #1,105
I would note that between the medical examiner and the lead investigator on this case, only one of them has been dishonorably discharged and fired for misconduct…

Seriously. Proctor was a problem before, but now it's official and in writing how badly he handled everything. (and IMO, his superiors who giggled along with him and signed off on his crap, phony investigation should end up fired too.) His lies alone about not knowing the McCabes and the Alberts well - or at all - should result in everything he did or didn't do here being questioned. But now the head of the state police has fired him indicating that his actions created an appearance of bias. And his bias and hyper focus on Read alone is why the truth of what really happened to Officer John O'Keefe never came to light.
 
Last edited:
  • #1,106
I haven't followed the case from the beginning.
All my information came from the TV documentary last couple of weeks.

Can someone tell me how many people conspired and would have to be lying if the victim was killed inside the house and subsequently placed outside?
 
  • #1,107
I haven't followed the case from the beginning.
All my information came from the TV documentary last couple of weeks.

Can someone tell me how many people conspired and would have to be lying if the victim was killed inside the house and subsequently placed outside?
More than 12
 
  • #1,108
Another CW MOTION

IMG_7179.webp
 
  • #1,109
Great explanation!!!!!!

The three in the car that pulled up behind her saw her alone in the car with no John in or around her car.

Bingo! So if she had hit and backed up over JO she would have hit the car behind her. Didn't happen.

All of the guests that walked by the phantom body claimed they were either looking at the ground or the sky as they walked by.
Exactly! Watching where they were walking or at the snow coming down. And to any traffic they were doing the same.
 
  • #1,110
The CW arguing (whining) in court about ARRCA made me realize something a bit crazy. They literally are acting like a defense team here, not the prosecution.

Honestly, why in the world would the court not want the truth in court?!!!! The whole truth is fine - the feds investigation is over. But, why hide the truth from the jury?
Has her own agenda along with Morrissey etc. etc. this kind of thing has been done many times in many places. None included decent moral character or any character or high intelligence, just what was in it for them.
 
  • #1,111
I haven't followed the case from the beginning.
All my information came from the TV documentary last couple of weeks.

Can someone tell me how many people conspired and would have to be lying if the victim was killed inside the house and subsequently placed outside?

Conspired? No one knows who knew what at what time. I'll just start out saying that Brian Albert is a local minor celebrity who was on a national cableTV show about Boston cops about 10 years ago and was considered to be a pretty powerful guy in the local area. Just for context.

The party was originally for Brian Albert Jr.s birthday. His parents, sister, cousin, aunt, and uncle were guests. Two of his friends were also there, testifying they were seated in the dining area of the house for the duration with the other younger people. The door to the basement would not be visible from the dining table.

Brian Higgins was also there. I personally suspect his relationship with Karen was the reason John went into that house in the first place. Something was going on with John and Higgins at the Waterfall (on video) and this was mere minutes before John would have arrived and presumably headed down to the basement where there was a bar set up. Perhaps to confront Higgins who was searching for whiskey he claimed at trial he never found?

So what were the non-involved party goers told to tell the police? Here I'll quote Matt McCabe's group text: "Just tell them the guy never went into the house".

The "guy". And that's exactly what everyone said. Easy peasy story. Nothing to remember to keep stories straight.
 
  • #1,112
Brennan filed a motion today for communications between David Yannetti and his client Karen Read!!!!!!!!! How is that even possible?? WTH is going on here? If this isn't a violation of Read's rights I don't know what is? Is this what it's come to? Just WOW!!

Maybe the Defense can ask for all the communications between everyone in the house that night and their lawyers. Let's not forget that every one of them had their lawyer present when they talked to DISGRACED Ex-trooper proctor and other investigators when they were interviewed.
 
  • #1,113
Conspired? No one knows who knew what at what time. I'll just start out saying that Brian Albert is a local minor celebrity who was on a national cableTV show about Boston cops about 10 years ago and was considered to be a pretty powerful guy in the local area. Just for context.

The party was originally for Brian Albert Jr.s birthday. His parents, sister, cousin, aunt, and uncle were guests. Two of his friends were also there, testifying they were seated in the dining area of the house for the duration with the other younger people. The door to the basement would not be visible from the dining table.

Brian Higgins was also there. I personally suspect his relationship with Karen was the reason John went into that house in the first place. Something was going on with John and Higgins at the Waterfall (on video) and this was mere minutes before John would have arrived and presumably headed down to the basement where there was a bar set up. Perhaps to confront Higgins who was searching for whiskey he claimed at trial he never found?

So what were the non-involved party goers told to tell the police? Here I'll quote Matt McCabe's group text: "Just tell them the guy never went into the house".

The "guy". And that's exactly what everyone said. Easy peasy story. Nothing to remember to keep stories straight.

Sorry, I can’t believe EVERYONE is a lying psychopath

The local police
the state police
rescue
ATF guy
everyone in the house
 
  • #1,114
Brennan filed a motion today for communications between David Yannetti and his client Karen Read!!!!!!!!! How is that even possible?? WTH is going on here? If this isn't a violation of Read's rights I don't know what is? Is this what it's come to? Just WOW!!

Maybe the Defense can ask for all the communications between everyone in the house that night and their lawyers. Let's not forget that every one of them had their lawyer present when they talked to DISGRACED Ex-trooper proctor and other investigators when they were interviewed.

Anything you say & can & will be held against you …

Karen is just had to run her mouth and she did it with her lawyer present.

Bonus - 50 plus hours of RAW FOOTAGE-

Re-Trial is gonna be lit! 🔥
 
  • #1,115
Brennan filed a motion today for communications between David Yannetti and his client Karen Read!!!!!!!!! How is that even possible?? WTH is going on here? If this isn't a violation of Read's rights I don't know what is? Is this what it's come to? Just WOW!!

And the hail marys just keep coming. Of course, those communications are privledged and even Judge Cannone knows her ruling would be succesfully appealed in a hot minute if she allowed it. Wild stuff though.
 
  • #1,116
Hank Brennan is in it to win it!

Karen Read is her own worst enemy

IMO
 
  • #1,117
And the hail marys just keep coming. Of course, those communications are privledged and even Judge Cannone knows her ruling would be succesfully appealed in a hot minute if she allowed it. Wild stuff though.
Yes @HarmonyE. …. IANAL ….. but isn’t there that little thing called ‘attorney client privilege’?

And wonder what those with knowledge on the subject think of the new prosecutor’s request for such?

Watching with interest to what the judge (and court) does with that motion. MOO
 
  • #1,118
Anything you say & can & will be held against you …

Karen is just had to run her mouth and she did it with her lawyer present.

Bonus - 50 plus hours of RAW FOOTAGE-

Re-Trial is gonna be lit! 🔥

RBBM -- funny how that footage doesn't involve the magically disappearing library CCTV nor the wonky backwards Police garage with a mirrored image and randomly missing parts.
 
  • #1,119
Sorry, I can’t believe EVERYONE is a lying psychopath

The local police
the state police
rescue
ATF guy
everyone in the house
Not all that you mentioned are lying just the "in crowd" It would be a tough call to make and continue to live there and act like nothing happened. I wonder how close these good friends or even family still are and if any have moved away or distanced themselves from the rest. I can't imagine anything would ever be the same.
 
  • #1,120
This is a commonwealth motion. I'm asking for an actual news source showing she killed a man, laughed about it, and exactly how you KNOW that she spent day x to day y "concocting a story"
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Staff online

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
142
Guests online
1,456
Total visitors
1,598

Forum statistics

Threads
632,438
Messages
18,626,505
Members
243,150
Latest member
Jackenhack
Back
Top