It is interesting to again follow this trial. Although I continue to be perplexed by the supposition that one is either a supporter of KR or not. That does not IMO seem to be an accurate goal. And IMO is not the standard that should be considered or applied.
IMO a review by the jury of presented evidence, testimony, witnesses, and court activity and rulings is what is needed and should be sought. I support a complete investigation, proper evidence collection, technique and protocol, and a fair, impartial process and presentation of evidence. Accurate court rulings on the record with clear, unequivocal statement of the basis for any such rulings sustained or overruled are also needed. How that collective is presented in court on the record would ultimately result in an allocation of justice for a criminal matter in a criminal court. IANAL. MOO