Let’s break some of your assertions down.
- “He died from exposure” That’s not a medical consensus. Dr. Mindy Hull testified that the cause of death was blunt force trauma, and exposure was only listed as a contributing factor. The injuries to his arm, head, and body are not consistent with being hit by a car, and there’s a legitimate debate among forensic experts about whether those wounds were perimortem or postmortem.
-“Broken taillight found at the scene” Yes, and there’s security footage showing the taillight intact after the alleged hit. Additionally, Sgt. Proctor is seen manipulating that taillight in the sallyport after the SUV had been seized. That’s documented video evidence. The issue isn’t whether tail light fragments were found; it’s how and when they got there, and why the ones “found” were clean, despite snow and melting conditions.
-“No definitive proof Proctor framed KR” There’s rarely “definitive proof” in conspiracy or corruption cases, but we do have multiple examples of altered police reports, missing logs, contradictory testimony, a destroyed phone, and a lead investigator with personal ties to key witnesses. Its a pattern of misconduct that warrants scrutiny, especially when the investigation skipped key steps like obtaining search warrants for 34 Fairview, even though John was supposed to attend a party there, and was found dead directly outside.
-“Karen said she hit him” Wrong. Just wrong. She never definitively said that. Her comment ‘Did I hit him? Could I have hit him?’ was made in panic, while searching for her boyfriend’s frozen body in the snow. She also said, “What if he got hit by a plow?” and “What if he walked somewhere?” - do you think that means she murdered him with a snowplow? No. We don’t convict people based on emotionally distraught hypotheticals uttered in real time, especially when other statements and physical evidence contradict that narrative.
-“She lied about going to the house” Or she was confused, intoxicated, and traumatized, just like EVERY witness in this case who gave inconsistent statements, including officers. The only difference is that Karen’s inconsistencies have been weaponized, while everyone else’s are brushed aside.
