MA - Professor Karen Read, 43, charged with murdering police officer boyfriend John O'Keefe by hitting him with car, Canton, 14 Apr 2023 #24 Retrial

Status
Not open for further replies.
  • #601
Yes she was all over the place. She may know her stuff but she does not present well.
Confusing to me that past phone calls delete themselves as its never happened to me and I never clear them out.

JMO
May be technical, not practical. You know the old saying "those who can't do, teach"
 
  • #602
So Alessi is not going to cross this lady? What is with the head scarf??
 
  • #603
I guess I'm bored but a couple questions. At this point and in the grand scheme of things known, does it matter or does anyone care anymore about the "2:27" call?????? AND does Brennans voice remind anyone of Anthony Hopkins voice in Silence of the Lamb????
Hello, Clarice……
 
  • #604
She presented it very well. The tab was opened at 2:27am, then she utilized it at 6:23am for the "hos" search...and the data is clearly there to prove it, unlike Mr Green's incorrect work at the first trial, MO.
Exactly! I agree she presented very well but imo she appeared very nervous on the stand. Data proves it! Nice try defense.
 
  • #605
  • #606
  • #607
Alessi just mentioned location history - EXACTLY what Ms. Hyde got excluded from in the MD trial.
 
Last edited:
  • #608
Alessi points out 1/29/22 12:32:09 AM side lock data. He is saying that Ms. Hyde was incorrect of her earlier estimate of John’s last activity.

Hyde says she cannot contest it but also cannot comment on Whiffen’s tests.

Alessi is asking why Hyde did not include the 12:32:09 artifact in her timeline.

He mentions that Hyde knows Whiffen - in fact, IIRC correctly, Hyde found Whiffen for the CW.
 
Last edited:
  • #609
Alessi points out 1/29/22 12:32:09 AM side lock data. He is saying that Ms. Hyde was incorrect of her earlier estimate of John’s last activity.

Hyde says she cannot contest it but also cannot comment on Whiffen’s tests.

Alessi is asking why Hyde did not include the 12:32:09 artifact in her timeline.

He mentions that Hyde knows Whiffen - in fact, IIRC correctly, Hyde found Whiffen for the CW.
Alessi: Matters of seconds can be determinative of a case.

Hyde is frustrated. ‘Absolutely.’

Alessi is asking how to reconcile Hyde’s last interaction of 12:20:50 with Whiffens 12:32:09 time. Saying Ms. Hyde has no basis to contest the side lock action from Mr Whiffen a full TWELVE MINUTES after she claimed no further interaction from the device.
 
Last edited:
  • #610
Iirc the glass was not a match from the bar. LE never checked glasses with the homeowner. Nor do I believe they checked to see if it came from John or Karen’s house
JMO
And where is the other half that glass? It wasn't found in the frond yard to my knowledge. Backyard? Basement? BA's trash?
 
  • #611
Exactly! I agree she presented very well but imo she appeared very nervous on the stand. Data proves it! Nice try defense.
Defense is destroying her.
 
  • #612
AJ points out 1/29/22 12:32:09 AM side lock data. He is saying that Ms. Hyde was incorrect of her earlier estimate of John’s last activity.

Hyde says she cannot contest it but also cannot comment on Whiffen’s tests.

AJ is asking why Hyde did not include the 12:32:09 artifact in her timeline.

He mentions that Hyde knows Whiffen - in fact, IIRC correctly, Hyde found Whiffen for the CW.
Just gently pointing out that this is attorney Alessi doing this cross.

I have been impressed with his knowledge of the law and his attention to detail.
 
  • #613
Boy this defense guy is very obnoxious in his demeanor while questioning, he won't let the witness answer his questions. He seems to want to make her seem unknowledgeable when all he's doing is making himself look abusive, MO
 
  • #614
Last edited:
  • #615
Wow. In Hyde’s OWN conclusion of her report from trial 1, she says the activity on John’s phone stopped on 12:31 - contradicting her own testimony just now. What is going on with her?

Alessi made sure to mention ‘Steps’ very clearly. Hope the jury caught that
 
  • #616
Just gently pointing out that this is attorney Alessi doing this cross.

I have been impressed with his knowledge of the law and his attention to detail.
Thank you so much! Listening in from work.
 
  • #617
  • #618
  • #619
  • #620
Status
Not open for further replies.

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
129
Guests online
3,229
Total visitors
3,358

Forum statistics

Threads
632,617
Messages
18,629,134
Members
243,219
Latest member
rhirhi123
Back
Top