MA - Professor Karen Read, 43, charged with murdering police officer boyfriend John O'Keefe by hitting him with car, Canton, 14 Apr 2023 #24 Retrial

Status
Not open for further replies.
  • #661
  • #662
I use my iPhone all day long. I have windows (tabs) open from at least a year ago, I’m horrible about closing them. Does that mean if today I opened up one of my old tabs and did a search, the date of my search would be from a year ago? Im not being snarky, I’m genuinely interested in the answer. How could courts ever use searches as evidence if we can’t confirm when the actual search was done?
I have no idea! Not that techy! :) I always close my windows and clear my cache on my iPad, iPhone and pc. If you leave your windows open on iPhone or iPad, I am under the impression that it wears battery.
 
  • #663
Hi all. It's been a long while since I have posted here, but do still read the forums. It is nice to see a lot of familiar names and read most of the comments. My point is that this case brings me back to Caylee Anthony and the trial of her "mom". It seems to be kinda the same as it was back then, where certain posters are only on here to start an argument or initiate a debate into things that are almost to keep people from reading what the facts are. Disagreements are fine, but the baiting and antagonizing is not. I am 100% about different perspectives and views but some of these posters are just trying to bait for an argument, not to discuss different view points. I am a verified 911 Dispatcher, which include answering 911 calls, dispatching police and fire. I have 30 years experience, and I still work and dispatch for departments that have 40 officers on duty at a time to as little as 2 officers on at any given time. IMO the initial 911 call says everything - "there is a "man" passed out in the snow". That was not a "man" not only was it supposedly her friend she loved dearly, he was also an off duty police officer. I have in the span of 30 years taken every different type of call you can imagine. That call in my expertise is someone who is out during the day on a walk and finds a random stranger down on the ground in the snow. Everything from that 911 call to where we are today in this trial is deplorable and a disgrace to any Law Enforcement Agecny. IMO
 
  • #664
Her face when Alessi said there was one more follow up… if looks could kill!
 
  • #665
I can’t believe she really looked Alessi in the eye and told him her analysis methods were better than reviewing Apple Source Code directly.
 
  • #666
Can we be done, please?
Goodness!
The jury right now ( IMO ):
Hears Ms Hyde : I had chicken and waffles for lunch. Blah blah blah
 
  • #667
  • #668
I think that was just her personality, her eye movements at first when talking about herself, her credentials. Once that was over she settled into it very well.

The main point is without the supposed deleted calls and deleted search the Jen theory is zeroed out.

This testimony already happened in T1 so nothing new.

It’s worth remembering that all this testimony is only needed because the defence expert Green misrepresented the Cellebrite reports in the first place. It’s always been a silly conspiracy that Jen would go home and google how long it would take John to die.

MOO
 
  • #669
Never would I think that JOK's phone was treated as evidence or treated in a proper, police investigative manner as it should of been. Surprised if it is seriously considered a phone that MAY HAVE been in a Faraday bag!
 
  • #670
Early release for the jury again.

Hope I don't jinx it, but I have been pleasantly surprised at the lack of juror issues so far in this trial. Seems we had several issues last time, so this is refreshing!
 
  • #671
Facepalm.. exactly what does Brennan think these three second clips of Karen will achieve? If I were the jurors, I’d be thinking ‘Gee, I wish they’d show that whole clip!’
 
  • #672
Facepalm.. exactly what does Brennan think these three second clips of Karen will achieve? If I were the jurors, I’d be thinking ‘Gee, I wish they’d show that whole clip!’
Sound is so bad I don't know what she even says.
 
  • #673
  • #674
Thank you! 😊. I just tried it and was able to see every page I visited in the last month, or so, separated by date. I wasn’t able to get any timestamps, though. I’ll keep playing with it!
 
  • #675
The main point is without the supposed deleted calls and deleted search the Jen theory is zeroed out.

This testimony already happened in T1 so nothing new.

It’s worth remembering that all this testimony is only needed because the defence expert Green misrepresented the Cellebrite reports in the first place. It’s always been a silly conspiracy that Jen would go home and google how long it would take John to die.

MOO
Agreed. I also think Ms. Hyde did extremely well on the stand on Direct and Cross. I'm a tad behind in viewing. I also think she schooled Attorney Alessi all along her cross examination.
 
  • #676
I will say one thing - I think this is the first trial I’ve ever watched where the prosecution has waited so long to introduce the meat & potato’s of the case.

10 days with no autopsy photos, no manner of death. In the meanwhile, they’ve heard over a dozen out of context, three-second clips of Karen.

The CW is floundering. MOO.
 
  • #677
Alessi isn't a man to try to match wits with, he will get you. JMOO
I was blown-away with all that Alessi knows about this area of forensics.
Did he have to learn all this on top of everything else in these 2 trials...and remember what it meant and how it works to boot or was it another area of his expertise?
Scream, just the thought.
imo
 
Last edited:
  • #678
Ms Hyde sure is animated. IMO this does not make her look more professional, or unbiased.
 
  • #679
I will say one thing - I think this is the first trial I’ve ever watched where the prosecution has waited so long to introduce the meat & potato’s of the case.

10 days with no autopsy photos, no manner of death. In the meanwhile, they’ve heard over a dozen out of context, three-second clips of Karen.

The CW is floundering. MOO.
These clips without context are designed to affect the jury psychologically. He wants the members of the jury to be affected mentally in their thinking, emotionally in their feelings and behaviorally in their verdict. A form of manipulation.
 
  • #680
Status
Not open for further replies.

Staff online

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
97
Guests online
3,110
Total visitors
3,207

Forum statistics

Threads
633,444
Messages
18,642,228
Members
243,538
Latest member
morestitches
Back
Top