I remember clearly this info from first trial. When the retired chief retired, there were photos taken. Higgins was there, Alberts were there, seen in the photo. Public. Looked like all men, yukking it up, this was after JOK found of course and all that followed at that time. They were all bonded for one reason or another. Higgins was with B. Albert then at that dinner retirement party, so still buds, no first trial and all that happened with it. IMO>YB was told to respond to 34 Fairview because Chief Berkowitz called him and told him he 'saw something while driving by' 2/4/22. Wow.
They then did not write a report about that piece of plastic for 18 months.
Is this new information? was it brought out during the 1st trial?YB was told to respond to 34 Fairview because Chief Berkowitz called him and told him he 'saw something while driving by' 2/4/22. Wow.
They then did not write a report about that piece of plastic for 18 months.
thanks.. you just answered my last question lolI remember clearly this info from first trial. When the retired chief retired, there were photos taken. Higgins was there, Alberts were there, seen in the photo. Public. Looked like all men, yukking it up, this was after JOK found of course and all that followed at that time. They were all bonded for one reason or another. Higgins was with B. Albert then at that dinner retirement party, so still buds, no first trial and all that happened with it. IMO>
Because he just happened to be driving by. Forget if he parked, went over and picked them up himself or more of the p story, senseless. IMOAJ pointing out: If CPD recused themselves from interviewing, why was the chief continuing to collect evidence/visit 34 Fairview?
That's all we get today.
"So far" the lack of actual evidence began the minute LE entered the residence and never asked NA & BA if they could search the house.I'd love to be told what the evidence of this is, especially considering the police officer testified today that KR said she didn't see JO go in the house before she left? Is there any evidence so far that places JO inside the Albert's house?
To be clear, that photo was taken at the Chief's retirement party out at a restaurant or party room it looked like. IMOthanks.. you just answered my last question lol
That was a 'slap on the hand' then and he knew it, so no worries today for him. Emboldens the corrupt and ones who are only concerned with self preservation and stops there. IMOThis guy was disciplined because of his behaviour in this case. Instead of acting cocky and defiant, he should be showing humility and embarrassment.
I do not remember it in trial 1! But I'm not entirely sure.Is this new information? was it brought out during the 1st trial?