MA - Professor Karen Read, 43, charged with murdering police officer boyfriend John O'Keefe by hitting him with car, Canton, 14 Apr 2023 #25 Retrial

Status
Not open for further replies.
  • #61
Presumably like they did Peggy O'Keefe, stand up, pass on your condolences and say no questions. Nothing to gain by cross, except make yourself look bad beating up kids,

“Say no questions” Did Peggy say ‘no questions’? And to who?
 
  • #62
  • #63
  • #64
Hmmm. Please explain to me, where do all the 47 pieces go here? How do they fit because I'm not seeing it.
They would almost be dust size
 
  • #65
“Say no questions” Did Peggy say ‘no questions’? And to who?
No the Defence, could have just said we have no questions to the judge when Peggy was on the stand. Instead they stood up, paid their respects and said we have no further questions for this witness.
 
Last edited:
  • #66
Another story changes today. The defendant changes her story now claiming she saw John O’Keefe go into the house. This contradicts earlier statements made.

Additionally, she really didnt answer the question about whether she deleted the Ring video.

It was a yes or no question. She did not answer with a yes or no.

Just a matter of opinion 🥴

Unbelievable
 
  • #67
  • #68
So let me get this straight here...the CW is not calling the lead investigator ( proctor), his commanding supervisor ( tully ), their own crash re-constructionist, ( paul ), the owner of the house who had a dead body on the front lawn just a couple of yards away from his bedroom ( brian albert), his soon to be ex- wife ( nicole), their adult kids who were having a party in the house that night ( brian jr, and caitlin ), the medical examiner, brian higgins who is a named suspect in JOK's murder and others... but is going to call 2 minors who lost the only father figure they had left in the world and who know absolutely nothing about what happened to their uncle that night on the stand to try to strangle an ounce of sympathy out of a jury who has surely checked out by this point.

How incredibly pathetic, desperate, and morally bankrupt do you have to be to think this is a good strategy and will play to your favor after the pathetic displays all your witnesses have exhibited thus far in this trial? Shame on you hank brennan! Shame on you!!!
Nicole and Brian are divorcing???
 
  • #69
No the Defence, could have just said we no questions to the judge when Peggy was on the stand. Instead they stood up, paid their respects and said we have no further questions for this witness.

“Could have said we no questions”
I’m sorry I still don’t understand.

Is it supposed to be ‘we know questions’?
 
  • #70
Did you watch the trial today? Something was unbelievable all right.
The attempt to equate Michael Proctor with " Honor and Integrity" by YB was unbelievable.
 
  • #71
The "crime" scene.

Tonight while making dinner I listened to Julie Albert's testimony from the 1st. trial.
She left the bar earlier the night before due to a migraine so she didn't go to the Albert's house with everyone else.
Every year on Brian Albert Jr. birthday morning she drops off 6 donuts for him and a card in his car.
She arrived at the Alberts around 8:30 am and told Yannetti that there were no police cars, no fire engines, no crime tape no people walking around etc and when he asked her if she could have run around on the lawn she answered yes, dropped tail light pieces, she said yes.

She had no idea anything was amiss until BA asked her to come in the house which she hadn't planned.
 
Last edited:
  • #72
“Could have said we no questions”
I’m sorry I still don’t understand.

Is it supposed to be ‘we know questions’?
WE have no questions.
 
  • #73
The attempt to equate Michael Proctor with " Honor and Integrity" by YB was unbelievable.
How could he say that with a straight face. Proctor is fired from the State Police, fired, because he had no honor or integrity.
 
  • #74
Nicole and Brian are divorcing???

Got rid of the dog, house, phone and now the wife? I wasn’t aware of the pending divorce.
 
  • #75
The "crime" scene.

Tonight while making dinner I listened to Julie Albert's testimony from the 1st. trial.
She left the bar earlier the night before due to a migraine so she didn't go to the Albert's house with everyone else.
Every year on Brian Albert Jr. birthday morning she drops off 6 donuts for him and a card in his car.
She arrived at the Alberts around 8:30 and told Yannetti that there were no police cars, no fire engines, no crime tape no people walking around etc and when he asked her if she could have run around on the lawn she answered yes, dropped tail light pieces, she said yes.

She had no idea anything was amiss until BA asked her to come in the house which she hadn't planned.
In Gallagher's testimony the other day, he said it was unsecured from 7:50am until early evening 5-5:30pm (approximately, because I can't remember).

Terrible that they didn't secure it at all.

Even after Gallagher's team left that evening, it was left unsecured. Just left to wait for the snow to melt.
 
  • #76
In Gallagher's testimony the other day, he said it was unsecured from 7:50am until early evening 5-5:30pm (approximately, because I can't remember).

Terrible that they didn't secure it at all.

Even after Gallagher's team left that evening, it was left unsecured. Just left to wait for the snow to melt.
I missed that timeline..OMG!

"The Perfect Storm", eh?
NPI
 
  • #77
The unhelpful and at times, anger, attitude, may be a result of all their meetings and coaching with Brennan and his team. Cult followers and they seem to really believe they are very much put upon by the bad guys. No problem with the lies and not acknowledging their previous sworn statements from trial 1. Not recalling. The thing is that it all has a heavy tone of arrogance. IMO
 
  • #78
The unhelpful and at times, anger, attitude, may be a result of all their meetings and coaching with Brennan and his team. Cult followers and they seem to really believe they are very much put upon by the bad guys. No problem with the lies and not acknowledging their previous sworn statements from trial 1. Not recalling. The thing is that it all has a heavy tone of arrogance. IMO
This also has signs of the green light from judge, kindly tone towards JMc and smiles, sympathy. They do not care. Not LE that has been on the stand as well. They may know better, but their answers show only in their own best interests and the people at the Albert house. SO surreal. IMO
 
  • #79
  • #80
The unhelpful and at times, anger, attitude, may be a result of all their meetings and coaching with Brennan and his team. Cult followers and they seem to really believe they are very much put upon by the bad guys. No problem with the lies and not acknowledging their previous sworn statements from trial 1. Not recalling. The thing is that it all has a heavy tone of arrogance. IMO
Why do all these people need coaching, tell lies, keep changing their stories from the Grand Jury to testifing in the 1st trial?
Bottom line is if they were on the up-and up none of this would be necessary.
And JOL supporters who want KR found guilty don't question any of this.
imo
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Guardians Monthly Goal

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
61
Guests online
842
Total visitors
903

Forum statistics

Threads
635,747
Messages
18,683,514
Members
243,382
Latest member
kaoruko
Back
Top