MA - Professor Karen Read, 43, charged with murdering police officer boyfriend John O'Keefe by hitting him with car, Canton, 14 Apr 2023 #27 Retrial

Status
Not open for further replies.
"He was able to pinpoint when O’Keefe’s phone recorded the three-point turn using speed, location and directional data. By comparing that to the Lexus data, Burgess said there was between a 21-29 second lag between the SUV's clock and O'Keefe's phone.

Based on that, his analysis shows the three-point turn occurred between 12:23:59 a.m. and 12:24:07 a.m. The back-up maneuver occurred between 12:32:04 a.m. and 12:32:12 a.m. O’Keefe’s iPhone was locked for the last time during that timeframe at 12:32:09 a.m."

MSN Link:
Did you watch the trial. Context matters with this. The witness was totally discredited as far as honesty and integrity and was shown to be shady and a liar. He was demolished
And Alessi has not even gotten to the supposed meat of his testimony.
Have a look if you have not already - it wasn't pretty
JMO
 
He submitted fake resumes. He submitted fake CVs.

And under oath, he sat in a chair, banking on these forgery qualifications and testified. That’s perjury.

It’s a felony. And it undermines every case where he gave “expert” testimony.
M00
Yes a no brainer, he also nicely showed that Brennan is just pushing for anything with anyone. Jury had an eye opening little lesson today. Aperture sunk themselves as reliable and competent business as well. IMO
 
As someone said earlier: While there’s no shame in not having a college degree, lying about one’s educational accomplishments is bad. When a so-called expert lies about their education and uses that lie to testify under oath before a jury, it is absolutely inexcusable, it's fraud.
 
As someone said earlier: While there’s no shame in not having a college degree, lying about one’s educational accomplishments is bad. When a so-called expert lies about their education and uses that lie to testify under oath before a jury, it is absolutely inexcusable, it's fraud.
Some want KR in prison so bad that they just don't care about experts and cops telling lies. JMO
 
Hi there! My name is MzMaryMac and I have a PhD in dead cops laying on lawns hit by cars as well as advanced degrees in mathematics, quantum physics, robot automation and rocket science from MIT. Karen Read is 100% guilty because I said so....

Oh...sorry....just kidding....but I did stay at a Holiday Inn Express last night so....
 
Hi there! My name is MzMaryMac and I have a PhD in dead cops laying on lawns hit by cars as well as advanced degrees in mathematics, quantum physics, robot automation and rocket science from MIT. Karen Read is 100% guilty because I said so....

Oh...sorry....just kidding....but I did stay at a Holiday Inn Express last night so....
omg that was soooo perfect!! We needed that laugh!! 🤣
 
Reminder that even through all this bologna we have yet to see physical evidence that JOK was murdered by a vehicle strike IMO
This is not a murder trial. The CW has shown no proof of a homicide, let alone a murder. This is just a circus.

The CW has really just shown that JOK died and had injuries (that were inconsistent w/ a collision)..
 
He submitted fake resumes. He submitted fake CVs.

And under oath, he sat in a chair, banking on these forgery qualifications and testified. That’s perjury.

It’s a felony. And it undermines every case where he gave “expert” testimony.
M00
Yes @Warwick7 ….. and IMO I was confused by several of his statements on the record today, in court, on just who solicited the ‘supplemental’ report.

In early cross from Alessi IIRC I believe Burgess indicated that despite what the printed report introduction said…… it was basically himself, Burgess, that sought need to update or supplement the report. (The report introduction essentially said words to the effect, ‘per your request Mr. Brennan’…… And Burgess tried to state that it was simply a matter of something in a definitive report having been ‘copied over’ from a prior document. And perhaps not properly vetted or examined? SMH)

And then under further questioning during cross by Alessi I thought I understood Burgess to then claim that it was the CW or Brennan that had solicited re-review or a supplement to the earlier report?

IMO this needs to be further investigated. And perhaps by the court, judge, MA Office of Bar Counsel, and any relevant Office of Disciplinary Counsel. On the record and under oath.

It almost seems there is now an unclear question on the record that needs to be addressed. And whether that might arise to further evidence of perjury or misrepresentations before the court is not yet clear. IANAL. MOO
 
It feels like Brennan is trying to lose this case.
I know lol - I keep thinking can Brennan actually be this incompetent?
I have not seen anything from him that would ever make me consider hiring him - quite the opposite.
Granted he has an uphill battle without truth on his side, but he has not made the best of it or crafted any type of winning strategy as far as I can tell. Even when the judge is in the bag for him - he strikes out every time.
IMO
 
As someone said earlier: While there’s no shame in not having a college degree, lying about one’s educational accomplishments is bad. When a so-called expert lies about their education and uses that lie to testify under oath before a jury, it is absolutely inexcusable, it's fraud.

I read a lot of fiction books and funny enough, a legal drama I was reading last night had a part where the so called medical examiner was testifying in court … except this person had no qualifications. Defense tore the witness apart, of course.
 
Yes @Warwick7 ….. and IMO I was confused by several of his statements on the record today, in court, on just who solicited the ‘supplemental’ report.

In early cross from Alessi IIRC I believe Burgess indicated that despite what the printed report introduction said…… it was basically himself, Burgess, that sought need to update or supplement the report. (The report introduction essentially said words to the effect, ‘per your request Mr. Brennan’…… And Burgess tried to state that it was simply a matter of something in a definitive report having been ‘copied over’ from a prior document. And perhaps not properly vetted or examined? SMH)

And then under further questioning during cross by Alessi I thought I understood Burgess to then claim that it was the CW or Brennan that had solicited re-review or a supplement to the earlier report?

IMO this needs to be further investigated. And perhaps by the court, judge, MA Office of Bar Counsel, and any relevant Office of Disciplinary Counsel. On the record and under oath.

It almost seems there is now an unclear question on the record that needs to be addressed. And whether that might arise to further evidence of perjury or misrepresentations before the court is not yet clear. IANAL. MOO
BBM
Agreed!!!!
 
No he didn't, not under oath, as you stated. He said they were errors in documents he was shown. Yes I watched.
Errors that HE made.
If he can't manage to post a correct CV, how on earth can he be trusted to come up with correct data?
Answer: He can't.
He's not an expert. He's a liar. And it's not just his lying about his CV that is an issue, it's when he prepared reports, and who he spoke to, and lying about that on the stand today.
IMO.
 
He submitted fake resumes. He submitted fake CVs.

And under oath, he sat in a chair, banking on these forgery qualifications and testified. That’s perjury.

It’s a felony. And it undermines every case where he gave “expert” testimony.
M00

It also makes Aperture as a company look dodgy.
17 years to not get a Bach of Science, I got my Bach of Applied Science in 3 years, I'm more qualified in physics and maths than this guy!
 
He said cars contain modules that track different data. The card he found, which also contained information like contact lists, call logs, serial numbers and phone numbers for connected devices, detailed time-stamp data about when the vehicle was powered on and off both before and after O'Keefe's death.

He said when the Lexus is powered on, an internal clock like a stopwatch begins running. When the car performs something like a three-point turn or backing maneuver, a time stamp is created as the clock continues to run.

Using the data pulled from the GPS navigation application Waze from O'Keefe's cell phone and Ring camera surveillance video, Burgess said he was able to verify the accuracy of the time stamps collected from the Lexus. He could also adjust for any slight variances between the times on different devices.

Read’s team tried to poke holes in Burgess’s credibility, accusing the analyst of misleading clients about his academic credentials.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
74
Guests online
450
Total visitors
524

Forum statistics

Threads
626,111
Messages
18,520,640
Members
240,941
Latest member
sesnse
Back
Top