Hitting a brick wall, right? Not soft flesh.He said if the vehicle was going more than 8 mph it would likely break the taillight. Under direct.
Hitting a brick wall, right? Not soft flesh.He said if the vehicle was going more than 8 mph it would likely break the taillight. Under direct.
$24,000 on record to date.AARCA's first report was free via FBI.
My understanding is that they are basically using the same report but adding a rebuttal to this Aperture nonsense.
So I am suspecting that the AARCA cost for the project to be much lower than Aperture.
JMO
I couldn't disagree with you more. He's refusing to answer and even changing questions.I would say that this is the first witness that's got the better of the defense lawyer cross examining him.
He's not like the other lame CW witnesses that clearly had an agenda.
I don't see that here. Just a dweeby, anal-retentive type of personality who honestly (in his mind) answers the questions and those answers are not what the defense lawyer is looking for.
Totally disagree.Alessi's lack of criminal trial experience has really cost the defence today.
I always felt it was a questionable decision to give such a key role to an attorney whose experience is all in big litigation. He doesn't have the chops for a jury in a murder case in the way AJ does. Alessi is responsible for the DiSorga mess, and now he's spent all day drawing attention to his client driving 24 mph in reverse.
He ought to have had a hit list of points, come in for an hour or two and hit those points and ended it.
All IMO.
I couldn't disagree with you more. He's refusing to answer and even changing questions.
That is what heard...but I thought " we will believe it when we see it"......I thought Alessi was guaranteed a ‘robust cross’ by Judge Cannone?
Alessi's lack of criminal trial experience has really cost the defence today.
I always felt it was a questionable decision to give such a key role to an attorney whose experience is all in big litigation. He doesn't have the chops for a jury in a murder case in the way AJ does. Alessi is responsible for the DiSorga mess, and now he's spending all day drawing attention to his client driving 24 mph in reverse.
He ought to have had a hit list of points, come in for an hour or two and hit those points and end it.
All IMO.
But no problem with the witness deflecting by bringing up pens and beds so he won't have to answer a question?I also don't care for the way the Alessi deflects or just moves on with no acknowledgement on the two or three instances where the witness had to either correct Alessi or point out that what he just said was false or wrong.
Disappointing cross examination from Alessi IMO, especially after he did so well in discrediting all the other crown witnesses to date.
Not at all. Not trying to mislead like previous defense witnesses.But no problem with the witness deflecting by bringing up pens and beds so he won't have to answer a question?
I honestly can’t believe he said that, I hope the jury understood it that way because I certainly did.so basically he didn't do the testing in case the testing didn't show what they wanted because then he'd have to defend it in court?
Okie dokie then.