Now that the CW (EBM) has rested, I would like to provide my two cents.
I have asked on here a couple of times now for anyone to come forward who started watching the trial(s) thinking KR was not guilty, but then changed their minds based on the evidence presented in the trial. Since I have yet to see one person here acknowledge this, I must conclude that the CW has NOT presented a case for a verdict of Guilty BARD.
Seeing as a jury is commanded to begin a trial with an open mind, and assuming the innocence of the defendant, how can one justify any other ruling that NG?
If you disagree or are a person who was convinced of her guilty BARD, starting with the supposition of her being presumed innocent, please let me know. TIA.