MA - Professor Karen Read, 43, charged with murdering police officer boyfriend John O'Keefe by hitting him with car, Canton, 14 Apr 2023 #32 Retrial

Status
Not open for further replies.
  • #961
It's worth noting Judge Cannone already granted the CW broad scope to impeach Lucky's credibility on the blogger threats, alleged receipt of payment/benefits from supporters, evolving testimony after contact with the defence, recanting of statements to the FBI, improvement of times between trials etc etc

The only thing she didn't let Brennan do is present the actual threats in Court, because Lucky said he didn't know about them specifically. So the lack of foundation here is about that narrow point.

Brennan was already allowed to allege that Lucky changed his testimony because of threats and inducements.

This all illustrates how 3rd party justice warriors can damage a case.

MOO
 
  • #962
I'm still catching up from yesterday. Wow, the defense couldn't have had a worse expert witness than Dr. Russell, MO. KR was not looking like her normal confident self listening to Dr. Russell being cross examined. She looked very worried, MO

What was Aleesi doing riding in the car with a witness? Couldn't she get a cab, an uber, her own limo? Alessi was also highlighting her talking points for her. He couldn't just hand her the highlighter? What else inappropriate did the defense do with their expert witness? The studies Dr. Russell picked to reference sure weren't even close to being simular in any way to JO's case, MO.

Then Attorney Alessi has a bit of a meltdown, yelling and banging, demanding a mistrial. Trying very hard to cut their loses because there was no doggie DNA found on the tears in JO's clothes. Oh the CW can't bring THAT up! That's a mistrial? That's a fact, swabbed and tested. MO

Now today, this poor plow guy doesn't know when he was on Fairview, he's been all over the place with his times. He and his brother have been harassed by a rabidly pro-KR blogger, written about online, talked about on podcasts, calling the plow driver's boss...all when the poor man had lost his wife.

He changes his testimony, his times and he stopped being harassed and became embraced by the KR supporters, Mr Loughran answered 'Correct" to that question.

It really is quite unbelievable. Witness coaching, and bias with one witness and then a harrassed witness just wanting the online crazies to leave him be, so it certainly seems like he adjusted his testimony to facilitate that. AJMO

Yeah I agree about Russell and Lucky, both did great with direct and were likable credible and believable. But…then there was Brennan

Is it possible for a person of science to say with 100% accuracy that a wound came from a dog? Not unless it was witnessed.

Is it possible for a person to memorize every action, visual, and time stamp of each day two years in the past? No

So to the thinking juror- Brennan’s tactics will be obvious.
Brennan with his monotone, beginning friendly, making connections but turning tenacious, arguing, nit picking, changing angles and using info given by a witness against them. He is quite skilled at this- as many jerk attorneys are, for me it is unkind to Dr Russell or Lucky.
Some jurors will see the witness as weakened by him, some will see through what he did.
Does Brennan’s actions represent justice for JO- I don’t think so.

I cannot imagine how the O’Keefe family could swallow all the things happening to KR and the witnesses. You would think they could see that what is happening is not Justice in JO’s name.

IMO
 
  • #963
With everything that is known, especially but by no means exclusively, JO's dog attacked right arm, which was apparently never, not by anyone, considered in relation to his MOD; ranging from Proctor, ambulance staff, emergency room staff (ffs), treating doctors (really?) all the way up to the ME herself (and ofcourse the various agents of the DA's office), I find it almost impossible to believe that the CW was ever really interested in real justice for Officer John O'Keefe. The DA's office and the PA are not Proctor's puppets. They decided Proctor's investigation was adequate to push ahead. They had access to all the physical evidence and more besides, and they green lighted the prosecution, not once but twice. Moo it was never about justice.

I don’t see any responsibility in the hands of all the medical staff you’ve listed
The scratches on JOs arm were not life threatening- he had a life threatening head wound and hypothermia-that was their focus.

It also has come to mind that a person suffering from hypothermia cannot be pronounced dead until the body rises to normal temps. So- JO was likely not responding and deceased when found, but pronounced hours later.

What hit his head? Cause of death is blunt force to the lower back portion of the head- why was there not investigation to find out what that could have been.
A flag pole has a slab, there was a fire hydrant- slab? an electrical box slab?, and the raised asphalt curbing all are raised solid surfaces nearby.

Did JO walk into the tree line to pee? That could have been determined. He could have dropped his phone in there- had to search for it.

Did Chloe jump the fence? If now, how did attacks on a person and neighbor dog happen if she was let out into a secure back yard? It is not a stretch to imagine her scaling that fence.

Last question- was Chloe trained or partially trained and failed as a police dog?
Did she have a drive to protect, attend to strangers, and when BA called her off- did he yell a word in German? Many German police dogs are trained using German commands.
What was the nature of the attacks made on people and other dogs? I’ve read that two person’s were ‘hospitalized’? Wow! How does a cop end up keeping a dog that attacked and caused two civilians to go to the hospital?
Curious if the Defense looked into more on Chloe and decided not to include? Or dropped it?

IMO
 
Last edited:
  • #964
With everything that is known, especially but by no means exclusively, JO's dog attacked right arm, which was apparently never, not by anyone, considered in relation to his MOD; ranging from Proctor, ambulance staff, emergency room staff (ffs), treating doctors (really?) all the way up to the ME herself (and ofcourse the various agents of the DA's office), I find it almost impossible to believe that the CW was ever really interested in real justice for Officer John O'Keefe. The DA's office and the PA are not Proctor's puppets. They decided Proctor's investigation was adequate to push ahead. They had access to all the physical evidence and more besides, and they green lighted the prosecution, not once but twice. Moo it was never about justice.
Karen never texted or left a message for John saying wtte

'John you knew I was sitting there waiting for you'
'why did you leave me here?'
'why didn't you come back out?'
'what are you doing in there?'
'you were going to come back and get me'

No, she left a message at 12.59am saying 'nobody knows where the f you are'

Hours later she called and told people she left him at Waterfall, he was dead, and he'd been hit by a plow. One of those people was inside the house. She never said to Jen, 'John went in to see you, what happened after that?' 'What time did he leave you?'

She said 'I hit him' to paramedics.

She told officers that day she didn't see him go inside the house.

She's changed her story because she found out they didn't investigate inside the house and when she knew there was no camera footage, IMO. The defence never said those wounds look like a dog attack for a year. They never said he went inside, for the best part of a year. Witnesses said he never went inside. Why would the police investigate a theory of dog wounds when they were never thought to be and didn't look like dog wounds according to any medics? They're not the defendant's mind readers.

The defendant said she hit him, her taillight was damaged, his DNA was on that taillight, and there was evidence of broken taillight in the road, on the lawn and in his clothing. That is an investigation which follows the evidence. They did investigate dog DNA once the defence came up with their theory. Not one set of wounds on his arm can individually be identified to have the characteristics of dog wounds, according to their own expert Dr Marie Russell. Once they alleged tampering the two officers who transported the car and were with the car in the sallyport were excluded from DNA on the taillight.

Not one wound looks like a human assault. No punches to his face or broken facial bones. Just a small cut on his eyelid with no associated bruising. John only had his own DNA under his fingernails.

Now her car data has been retrieved. John's phone data has yielded more information. And it affirms the commonwealth's charges. She drove forwards, shifted gears and reversed at high speed, towards where she last saw John, where she expected him to be, and John's phone never moved again.

I don't see how this is not about justice.

Let's see what ARCCA says.

All my opinion.
 
  • #965
Karen never texted or left a message for John saying wtte

'John you knew I was sitting there waiting for you'
'why did you leave me here?'
'why didn't you come back out?'
'what are you doing in there?'
'you were going to come back and get me'

No, she left a message at 12.59am saying 'nobody knows where the f you are'

Hours later she called and told people she left him at Waterfall, he was dead, and he'd been hit by a plow. One of those people was inside the house. She never said to Jen, 'John went in to see you, what happened after that?' 'What time did he leave you?'

She said 'I hit him' to paramedics.

She told officers that day she didn't see him go inside the house.

She's changed her story because she found out they didn't investigate inside the house and when she knew there was no camera footage, IMO. The defence never said those wounds look like a dog attack for a year. They never said he went inside, for the best part of a year. Witnesses said he never went inside. Why would the police investigate a theory of dog wounds when they were never thought to be and didn't look like dog wounds according to any medics? They're not the defendant's mind readers.

The defendant said she hit him, her taillight was damaged, his DNA was on that taillight, and there was evidence of broken taillight in the road, on the lawn and in his clothing. That is an investigation which follows the evidence. They did investigate dog DNA once the defence came up with their theory. Not one set of wounds on his arm can individually be identified to have the characteristics of dog wounds, according to their own expert Dr Marie Russell. Once they alleged tampering the two officers who transported the car and were with the car in the sallyport were excluded from DNA on the taillight.

Not one wound looks like a human assault. No punches to his face or broken facial bones. Just a small cut on his eyelid with no associated bruising. John only had his own DNA under his fingernails.

Now her car data has been retrieved. And it affirms the commonwealth's charges. She drove forwards, shifted gears and reversed at high speed, towards where she last saw John, where she expected him to be, and John's phone never moved again.

I don't see how this is not about justice.

Let's see what ARCCA says.

All my opinion.

This is why, if I were a juror, I would need to hear from the defendant.

She drove high speed in reverse - yet that is nowhere in all the interviews.

Yet the one place she did say it, is in her aborted interview with YB. So she knew this long before the data was revealed.

On any view, she has always lied about that high speed reverse IMO. The data is the data and neither the defence nor DOJ have produced any evidence that the 24mph reverse was not accurately logged. If it occurred somehow innocently, she needs to explain it - otherwise it's simply highly inculpatory.

MOO.
 
  • #966
She's changed her story [...] when she knew there was no camera footage, IMO.

RSBM

This explains so much of the original staging IMO.
 
  • #967
I'm still catching up from yesterday. Wow, the defense couldn't have had a worse expert witness than Dr. Russell, MO. KR was not looking like her normal confident self listening to Dr. Russell being cross examined. She looked very worried, MO

What was Aleesi doing riding in the car with a witness? Couldn't she get a cab, an uber, her own limo? Alessi was also highlighting her talking points for her. He couldn't just hand her the highlighter? What else inappropriate did the defense do with their expert witness? The studies Dr. Russell picked to reference sure weren't even close to being simular in any way to JO's case, MO.

Then Attorney Alessi has a bit of a meltdown, yelling and banging, demanding a mistrial. Trying very hard to cut their loses because there was no doggie DNA found on the tears in JO's clothes. Oh the CW can't bring THAT up! That's a mistrial? That's a fact, swabbed and tested. MO

Now today, this poor plow guy doesn't know when he was on Fairview, he's been all over the place with his times. He and his brother have been harassed by a rabidly pro-KR blogger, written about online, talked about on podcasts, calling the plow driver's boss...all when the poor man had lost his wife.

He changes his testimony, his times and he stopped being harassed and became embraced by the KR supporters, Mr Loughran answered 'Correct" to that question.

It really is quite unbelievable. Witness coaching, and bias with one witness and then a harrassed witness just wanting the online crazies to leave him be, so it certainly seems like he adjusted his testimony to facilitate that. AJMO

An attorney helping a witness on how to present themselves in a trial isn‘t wrong.

Maybe to some it is a black and white but I think it is pretty gray- the attorney can listen to what they will say, and encourage them to tell their own truth. They can talk about possible traps in cross and tactics to respond- so long as they are telling their own truth.
Everyday people would be unaware of the types of tactics an attorney can use to make them look like liars or idiots or memory disabled. Witness prep should help here- testifying in a murder case would be terrifying as there so much at stake for all involved.

It would be wrong to encourage a witness to change a testimony to something that isn’t true or works better for the attorney’s case.

IMO
 
  • #968
For those that are wondering how a community could possibly pull together to cover up a murder? Please. I grew up in just this kind of community. But think more midwest and more run by the actual mafia. Everyone knew everyone and if you were not in that circle, you were worthless. Need a cop? Good luck. Want to open a business? Gotta grease some palms. Have a complaint? Tell the mayor. Oh...wait...he went to prison.

My conclusion- I noticed that many had never left. Their grandparents met married and lived there, their parents met married and lived there.

Case in point- I went to school with people who hold all of these current offices in my home town- head football coach, pastor of local church, principal of high school, superintendent, sheriff, and mayor.
Many classmates married other classmates- so both are from there, parents there, stayed there.
They are good people- but very tight and still maintain the same class and racial divisions that were present in high school. In 2025!


I can see pros and cons for digging and planting such deep roots.
For many of them, even today, the world and home is 100 square miles.
For me- the world is states, countries, and continents, and home is where I am at present.

IMO
 
Last edited:
  • #969
And it's not just Lucky.

Ricky D'Antuono. Ryan Nagel. Heather Maxon. Brian Higgins. Jen McCabe. Matt McCabe. Sara Levinson. Julie Nagel. Caitlyn Albert. Tristan Morris.

All of these people drove or walked and drove past the front lawn and should have seen a large human on the front lawn. They didn't because he wasn't there.

Or he walked toward the tree line to pee, part of his 36 steps

Then he couldn’t be seen because he had fallen and hit his head and wasn’t laying flat on the ground out in the open, he was up under the trees and maybe propped up against one of those trees.

Body temp when found seems to me still too high-
If he had been exposed many hours
I’d like to hear what an expert says.

IMO
 
Last edited:
  • #970
Yes @LittleSeaTree and @Forest_Wood …. very interesting comments! And I too was puzzled and intrigued by some of Dever’s wordings in response to AJ. It seemed to be something about ‘on the clock’, overtime, or words to that effect? And IIRC the witness was somewhat ‘creative’ with responses about what she knew then and what she knew ow or recalled later? And IIRC the judge even had to admonish her on the stand about that.

And with all the apparent happenings that evening IIRC, would it have been likely someone just might have wanted to stick around to see what all the responses were about?

Add to that the post #900 of @Seattle1 about which police individuals apparently controlled access to those doors! From testimony of another police witness.

Lastly, didn’t Dever then later get a transfer from the CPD? If someone said all of this raises an eyebrow, I would agree. MOO.
 
  • #971
If BH said he say a ‘tall dark haired stranger’ enter the house and that was supposed to be JO. Then it doesn’t make sense. He saw JO at the Waterfall, and he text JO so he had his number somehow.

IMO
The narrative they put together was" just say the guy never went in to the house' ( text Matt Mcacabe).

Higgins is a federal agent. He brought his lawyer to court with him and the lawyer was allowed to advise Higgins during his testimony. He obvi also advised him before court ( first trial)

I think Higgins told his lawyer that John was indeed inside but it incriminates everybody and the lawyer said Well don't name him just say you saw someone enter and desribe them.
So not perjury. And he distances himself from an attack if there was one.

JMO
 
  • #972
So funny - seems the local buzz is -
What? no trial today bc too hot? Noisy fans?
How about get some air condo for that old building instead of spending all the money on this ridiculous trial

Summer is coming so this ridiculous
JMO
 
  • #973
Watching Court TV, showing clips of Jury Visit to 34 Fairview

It shows KR’s Lexus in front of the house
It also shows a white Ford Edge parked in the driveway

IMO
 
  • #974
Karen never texted or left a message for John saying wtte

'John you knew I was sitting there waiting for you'
'why did you leave me here?'
'why didn't you come back out?'
'what are you doing in there?'
'you were going to come back and get me'

No, she left a message at 12.59am saying 'nobody knows where the f you are'

Hours later she called and told people she left him at Waterfall, he was dead, and he'd been hit by a plow. One of those people was inside the house. She never said to Jen, 'John went in to see you, what happened after that?' 'What time did he leave you?'

She said 'I hit him' to paramedics.

She told officers that day she didn't see him go inside the house.

She's changed her story because she found out they didn't investigate inside the house and when she knew there was no camera footage, IMO. The defence never said those wounds look like a dog attack for a year. They never said he went inside, for the best part of a year. Witnesses said he never went inside. Why would the police investigate a theory of dog wounds when they were never thought to be and didn't look like dog wounds according to any medics? They're not the defendant's mind readers.

The defendant said she hit him, her taillight was damaged, his DNA was on that taillight, and there was evidence of broken taillight in the road, on the lawn and in his clothing. That is an investigation which follows the evidence. They did investigate dog DNA once the defence came up with their theory. Not one set of wounds on his arm can individually be identified to have the characteristics of dog wounds, according to their own expert Dr Marie Russell. Once they alleged tampering the two officers who transported the car and were with the car in the sallyport were excluded from DNA on the taillight.

Not one wound looks like a human assault. No punches to his face or broken facial bones. Just a small cut on his eyelid with no associated bruising. John only had his own DNA under his fingernails.

Now her car data has been retrieved. John's phone data has yielded more information. And it affirms the commonwealth's charges. She drove forwards, shifted gears and reversed at high speed, towards where she last saw John, where she expected him to be, and John's phone never moved again.

I don't see how this is not about justice.

Let's see what ARCCA says.

All my opinion.
JO's wounds are not congruent with being struck by a vehicle and Welcher's testimony failed to debunk ARCCA's independent findings as presented in trial X 1. The rest of your points are not, Imo, evidence JO sustained his injuries from impact with a tail light. Also you presume to know that KR knew where JO was located if or when she reversed. There is no way you can know that. Jmo

I don't agree JO's phone data either confirms or justifies the CW's charges. And I think you may have missed the entire point of my post. Proctor did not investigate the dog angle as he should have, the cw followed suit and here we are today.

Also the reason AJ initially joined KR's defense was because of those wounds. Like many others who have eyes, he saw photos of the arm wounds and his common sense told him an animal/dog was involved. I'm sure this has been reported in msm and will track down a link but the history of AJ's involvement in this case has been discussed in prior threads. Since then, experts have confirmed dog involvement as the most reasonable and likely cause. I found Drs Russel and Sheridan credible last year and I find Dr Russell more than credible and qualified this year. Moo

Yes, we shall see what ARCCA says though I am predicting they will eat Welcher for breakfast. There is too much reasonable doubt already in this case for a jury to convict in the event they are able to put aside their personal biases and apply the faculty of reason to the evidence. I hope the jury takes their duties seriously. Moo
 
  • #975
It's worth noting Judge Cannone already granted the CW broad scope to impeach Lucky's credibility on the blogger threats, alleged receipt of payment/benefits from supporters, evolving testimony after contact with the defence, recanting of statements to the FBI, improvement of times between trials etc etc

The only thing she didn't let Brennan do is present the actual threats in Court, because Lucky said he didn't know about them specifically. So the lack of foundation here is about that narrow point.

Brennan was already allowed to allege that Lucky changed his testimony because of threats and inducements.

This all illustrates how 3rd party justice warriors can damage a case.

MOO

So now the FBI is important but not when they hired a company that said no collision happened. Got it. JMO
 
  • #976
So I’m in line at a drive thru

Was looking for my debit card after ordering. Then looked up and immediately noticed the bronco in front of me has a cracked right taillight. Nothing i was looking for. It just stuck out. No other damage to the vehicle.

I truly believe the eye and mind notice things out of place. The kids/young adults in the vehicle parked behind Karen absolutely would have noticed. At LEAST one of them. & they certainly would have noticed a body on the lawn IMO
Yes! Officer Barros knew what he saw too. A crack, one small piece missing, and no major damage!
 
  • #977
I totally agree, KK humanized Karen. She also said that Karen didn’t seem intoxicated, which was helpful to the defense. IMO, it’s odd that JMc wouldn’t have invited KK and her husband back to 34 Fairview. Why would that be? If you’re all leaving at approximately the same time, why wouldn’t everyone in the group be invited? I’m chewing on that for a bit.

I’m also thinking a lot about Barros’ testimony. If I believe my eyes (and Barros’ testimony) the taillight was not smashed into 47 pieces when she allegedly backed into John so WHEN was it smashed, by WHOM, and HOW did it get to 34 Fairview?

One of my relatives is retired FBI/ATF/HSI and his experience is that a conspiracy with so many people is hard to maintain. That makes complete sense to me, but Barros’ testimony has me wondering if there really is a conspiracy? I’m not sure how else to explain the difference in her taillight from the time it left her custody to the time they took pics in the sally port.
KK and her husband were not "friends", just high school sports parent "friends" so they would not be invited to the circle who normally hang with the McAlbert bunch. These people have run together since high school. JOK and KR were also not the same kind of "friends" JOK was being set up for some reason.

What I wonder is what would have happened if KR had gone into the house with John?? The McAlbert bunch are not of Mensa intelligence. Something happened and they had to move quick but what if KR was there too?.
 
  • #978
Based on what I’ve watched of the trials it appears some of what the Defense is implying isn’t even possible.
The ‘motive’ suggested by Waterfall innuendos seems to be BH jealousy for KR against JO, and a plan to meet at BAs home to settle.

I contest- BH was not ever at 34 Fairview at the same time as KR. Here is why…

BH has a jeep with a plow, described as being parked in front of the mailbox
BH is described as having arrived near the time of BA and NA
KR didn’t mention seeing BH’s jeep
None of BAJrs friends mention seeing BH’s jeep, but saw KR’s car and RNagel truck

No one leaving describes having to ask BH to move his jeep with plow so they could get out.

Seems to me- BH left before KR arrived at 34 Fairview.

Just my
One will never know all the whereabouts BH was because he threw away his phone. So did BA. If one doesn’t see the menance in that, then their mind is definitely not open. Moo
observations
 
  • #979
This was worst murder investigation in the history of the United States of America. Well, at least as far as I know...

From the very minute the first officers arrived on the scene to find JO's barely breathing, bleeding out on the lawn, receiving CPR from citizens body----there was not a single thing done by law enforcement that would be considered standard protocol during a possible homicide investigation. Not one.

● The crime scene was never even determined let alone taped off. This is how much the Canton Police Department respected the murder of a fellow police officer left to die in a blizzard.

● They didnt even retrieve your blood and place them in sterilized, standard receptacles, they’ll just knock on the door of a neighbor and ask for some solo cups and some paper bags from the grocery store. 🙄

● They won’t even bother to ask that same neighbor if they could look at his camera footage pointed directly at the body and the house where body was found. The case could have been solved within an hour of the same time frame in which he eagerly provided the cups and bags.

● Proctor, turns out he and his family are long time family friends with the family where the body was found. Automatic recusal from the case not even up for debate, right? Nope!

● Soooo he stays on the case and that afternoon briefly interviews three people from the house the night before. Labels them witnesses, never even considers them to be possible suspects.

● Allows their version of events to become his theory of the case within four hours of JO's death.

● Proctor, in M00 proceeds to lie about the time of the tow, (didnt know her Daddy had video 😊) takes the car to a department that was friendly rather than closer, he and his fellow criminals break the tail light in order to plant them at the scene in order to frame KR.

● Proctor purposely delays the only professional search team, in M00, waiting all day to search the scene for clues and conduct a proper investigation. They find basically nothing besides the planted evidence.

● Proctor begins discussing the details of this case in personal chain text message groups with other detectives and his bosses while also giving details to high school buddies and his sister.

● During an active murder investigation. Proctor was offered a gift by a family member of the people who were at the house when someone was murdered. He said no give it to my wife. A gift! 🙄

● He takes months and months to interview certain people in the house, you know witnesses. Some of them he took a year or eighteen months to interview.

● He deleted ring cam footage. Per RIchard Green testimony.

● He disrespected the coroner because he didn’t like her findings.

● In M00 he told about 17 provable, fact checked lies on the stand. His bosses were even worse.

● He omitted things on his report. AND He wished the suspect would kill herself.

● The very first rule you learn, separate the witnesses. He not only didn’t do that he allowed them to hear what was being said in the background.🫨

● He conducted the testing on the car with an “expert” that didn’t know what the word physics meant.

● This trooper received his detailed information about body placement from a lieutenant that never even saw the body.

● He conducted all his tests from guessing where the body was lying when discovered.

● Proctor wrote up warrant for the cell phone companies to compel them to give only six hours of cell phone data instead of the 48.

● He did not record any of his interviews,

● Proctor never documented any chain of custody never with any of the evidence, including bloody clothing and the collected blood from the scene.

● Another thing was the reverse image video of the sallyport. The image was reversed but the timestamp was not.

Wow.....then Yuir has the audacity to testify that the investigation was done with honor and integrity.

Maybe we should get him that dictionary so he can look up integrity and honor. 😉
Preach Warwick! You know your right! High 5s.!
 
  • #980
I think it's important for us to recognize that the def this time around is much more focused on showing that KR did NOT do it -- could not have, the evidence says something completely different - while being VERY non-specific as to a particular alternate scenario of what happened.

Re KR - each one of these kills the viability of the cw's case, and ALL have been shown to be true (in some of them, by BOTH the cw and def testimony)
1 Her vehicle could not have caused the injuries to JOK. [Some on this is still to come, compelling ARCCA testimony in T1 and still to be shared in T2]
2 His arm could not have caused the damage to the vehicle. [Some on this is still to come, compelling ARCCA testimony in T1 and still to be shared in T2]
3 His arm injuries were caused by a dog bite and his overall injuries (including arm) were NOT consistent with being from a vehicle.
4 Her taillight damage did not exist before the CW took possession of the vehicle, to allow the pieces that were eventually and gradually collected over WEEKS on the lawn to have been there that night.
5 There's evidence JOK must have gone inside the house.
6 No one saw JOK on the lawn, even though MANY passed by, until he was found the next morning.
7 The 1162 key cycle definitely must have happened much later when KR car was in possession of cw. [Some on this is still to come, compelling ARCCA testimony in T1 and still to be shared in T2]
8 The evidence that was supposedly collected was not (by LE norms) professionally logged, photographed, recorded, or preserved from tampering and contamination.

But if it's not KR, then who did it? We aren't sure. But we showed you the jury a BUNCH of jinky things done by the home owner(s), the lead investigator, others there that night, within the (supposed) evidence itself, and more. Stories keep changing. Evidence pointing in other directions gets buried, not investigated further. Key people in the case that have been cw witnesses including the lead investigator were hidden from you and not called to testify by the cw, and the law says you can draw negative inferences from that (obviously). It's not our job to figure out who killed JOK, but it definitely wasn't KR.
Thanks for this post Steve. It's so well said!🙂
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Staff online

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
130
Guests online
2,978
Total visitors
3,108

Forum statistics

Threads
632,557
Messages
18,628,393
Members
243,195
Latest member
CaseyClosed
Back
Top