Here is the evidence:
Devers made a statement to the FBI that implicated multiple officers
Devers later testified that her statement was due to a false memory.
Only one of these can be true.
As an impartial observer, which is a more common and likely event:
A police officer covering for another police officer/police department
A police officer having “false memories” that caused her to create a whole imaginary scenario and report it to the fbi.
And if an impartial observer saw that this police officer is not only still on the job, but has been rewarded with a raise, is it more likely she was rewarded even though she can’t differentiate fantasy from reality? Or because she covered up police misconduct?
Jmo.
I see,
It seems she changed jobs, was promoted, and that this may be because she covered up for cops by changing her testimony.
What of this is fact and what of this is people projecting their own speculations as to what happened, I haven’t a clue.
I have not read up on any of that part of this case other than comments I’ve seen here, so I don’t know.
I just watched Dever’s testimony Live and saw the reactions here. She isn’t a breath of sunshine, came across to me as a terrified young woman in a male dominated profession who has a chip on her shoulder.
Many of us have worked with women like that. Pretty ironic as I see them in theoretical mathematics, physics, engineering, and chemistry laboratory stuff behind the scenes.
Not unlike ARCCA, but with less attention.
Some don’t do well as instructors, can be difficult to work, are quite misunderstood.
That was how I saw Devers- until the reactions here.
IMO