MA - Professor Karen Read, 43, charged with murdering police officer boyfriend John O'Keefe by hitting him with car, Canton, 14 Apr 2023 #32 Retrial

Status
Not open for further replies.
  • #541
It’s what the jurors saw today - I was watching and it played at 3:30:08
And I just provided you proof that the CW has edited it to enhance certain colors. The original video I linked is from September 2022.
 
  • #542
  • #543
IMO, Day 26 was a very good day for Karen Read.

- Dr. Russell, with her unique background, came off very believable and withstood a rough cross. She explained some details about the dog bites to help me understand what I was looking at. Brennan accusing her of having a faulty memory was beyond disgusting.

- Sgt. Barros was a breath of fresh air. I’m wondering if his demeanor on the stand will make some of the jurors think back to other LEOs who were less than forthcoming. I found his testimony to corroborate the Dighton ring video that showed only PART of the taillight missing.

I expect that Brennan will be extra aggressive tomorrow. IMO, the day after the defense has a good day, he gets a bit more aggressive with his cross (or redirect when he was presenting).
 
  • #544
All Hank proved on cross was that he himself was more of a horses behind. Moo
He literally accomplished nothing I watched carefully to see if there wouid be a flaw that made a difference
 
  • #545
Also it was found that JMc listened in on Kerrie's, OF COURSE, that was brought up earlier in this trial 2. 'SHE'S TELLING HIM EVERYTHINGGGG'. Kerrie seemed pretty put out a bit by that. That's what happens when police procedure is not followed Kerrie and just have a buddy (proctor) come 'ovah the house' and have a chat. IMO
Yes Keek and we know both Kerry and JM had to have seen KRs taillight exactly in tact except for the one piece that Barios described. How can they have blatantly lied about that? Bet they both are freaking out now and all the rest if them in this bloody coverup. The very sad thing is that Karen thought they were her friends. They were using her to get close to John . Disgusting! Moo
 
  • #546
Like her or not, Karen Read has had her life turned upside down by crooked cops. She was a wealthy, successful single woman accomplishing everything and has now lost her home, jobs, 401k, etc., all because - why??? Brian Higgins, Brian Albert - you got some 'splaining to do!!
And Proctor should be put in prison for tampering with evidence. Mo
 
  • #547
Yes Keek and we know both Kerry and JM had to have seen KRs taillight exactly in tact except for the one piece that Barios described. How can they have blatantly lied about that? Bet they both are freaking out now and all the rest if them in this bloody coverup. The very sad thing is that Karen thought they were her friends. They were using her to get close to John . Disgusting! Moo
I hope their whole community shuns them. They are exposed as liars - there should be consequences for plotting to put an innocent woman in jail.
 
  • #548
HB keeps asking the same questions over and over.
did not see today's proceeding but I thought that yesterday- wondered why the D's did not object with "asked and answered" but maybe the D's get over-ruled so much, they do not bother.
 
  • #549
Dbm
 
Last edited:
  • #550
That's because that tail light was messed around with in the Sallyport where it was smashed into 47 pieces! Imo
 
  • #551
  • #552
And I just provided you proof that the CW has edited it to enhance certain colors. The original video I linked is from September 2022.
Is there anything shady the CW won't do?

Good grief. Quit trying to polish this waste.
 
  • #553
I have always thought it looked like a reflection that disappeared as she drove off towards the right of the camera, combined with snow caked on the taillights, and swirling snow all around. Living in Northern Vermont on the Canadian border, my taillights had snow caked on them all winter (great ski season up here!).

I can see how some people are convinced it's a broken taillight, but then I remember we're looking at less-than-optimal camera footage that's been overly enhanced, and I think about all the cases on Websleuths where people can't agree on what they see. Delphi murders are a prime example. So I tend to put less credence on unclear video.

Sometimes you just can't figure out what you're looking at. It's easy to be swayed by people who tell you they're certain. Our brains want to fill in that unknown space.

Did I mention I'm certain I have a photo of Sasquatch walking near our stream in the woods? Maybe it's on its way to Canada after getting lost fleeing the West Coast.
 
  • #554
Wow the CW really are cooked now! JMO
 
  • #555
I hope their whole community shuns them. They are exposed as liars - there should be consequences for plotting to put an innocent woman in jail.
I wonder if any of them thought of John’s niece and nephew or their own children when doing whatever they did. John’s niece and nephew have experienced 3 lifetimes worth of loss at their young ages. The McCabe’s kids don’t deserve to be dragged through all of this garbage.
 
  • #556
I’m pretty sure Yanetti has a office.
Mr Jackson Preferred to use the conference room at the hotel he stayed at. The hotel provides that amenity.
 
  • #557
It's ok. Jmo he made nothing up. The tow truck video shown on direct is extremely damning and supports his testimony. But all on his own, he was credible, trustworthy and believable.moo
Yes he was just a good decent regular guy trying to do the right thing/ Is that so hard to fathom ?

Good will always win - it just sometimes take more time than I'd like ( fingers crossed)

I know some people want a Guilty verdict bc she's unlikable and MAYBE she is GUILTY - thats not how the courts or our system works here - at least for now - in America - you need to prove it - there are those ole pesky standards you have to meet.

And if they cannot find her Guilty with all the cheating and lying - well just what does that tell you.

Reasonable doubt is riddled through out this whole case in an enormous fashion

JMO
 
Last edited:
  • #558
I have watched the videos, looked at the pictures from testimony, I don't need anyone to tell me what I can and cannot see, that is my point... what you see and what I see are different.... meaning... the pictures and videos are obviously still up for debate IMO

The CW and defense don't seem to agree on it still, since we are more than half way through the 2nd trial and they are still trying to convince the jury one way or the other too.
I am repeating myself, but I sincerely believe the CW knows they have the wrong person on trial.

Justice is not the point here.
 
  • #559
The video is clearly edited to enhance certain colors. It’s been discussed multiple times on this thread since Brennan initially used it. Here is the original:

Additionally, “the white” spot is a glare that disappears just a frame later. I’ve even included a screenshot from your video that shows a completely red taillight
Yes I've seen that several times - totally agree - I expected someone to point it out in court today
JMO
 
  • #560
I am repeating myself, but I sincerely believe the CW knows they have the wrong person on trial.

Justice is not the point here.
The CW is looking for a win, not for justice for JOK.
That was evident from the day he was found.
No looking for the truth of the matter from the get-go.
It's abhorrent.
IMO.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Staff online

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
145
Guests online
3,107
Total visitors
3,252

Forum statistics

Threads
632,115
Messages
18,622,301
Members
243,026
Latest member
JC_MacLeod
Back
Top